Comparative Evaluation of Conventional and OnyxCeph™ Dental Software Measurements on Cephalometric Radiography

Objective:Cephalometry can be measured with traditionally conventional analysing methods (hand tracing), as well as using computers. Many dental softwares have been developed for this purpose. The reliability of these programs are often compared with the conventional method. The aim of the present s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elif İzgi, Filiz Namdar Pekiner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Galenos Yayinevi 2019-06-01
Series:Turkish Journal of Orthodontics
Subjects:
Online Access: http://www.turkjorthod.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/comparative-evaluation-of-conventional-and-onyxcep/53431
_version_ 1797767461954650112
author Elif İzgi
Filiz Namdar Pekiner
author_facet Elif İzgi
Filiz Namdar Pekiner
author_sort Elif İzgi
collection DOAJ
description Objective:Cephalometry can be measured with traditionally conventional analysing methods (hand tracing), as well as using computers. Many dental softwares have been developed for this purpose. The reliability of these programs are often compared with the conventional method. The aim of the present study was to compare the conventional method of manual cephalometric analysis with a computerized one, OnyxCeph ™ (Image Instruments, Chemnitz, Germany) dental software.Methods:Lateral cephalometric radiographs of 150 patients (75 males and 75 females) age range 12-34 were traced by two methods. Conventional method and computerized (OnyxCeph) cephalometric analysis method. 2 maxillar, 3 mandibular, 2 maxillo-mandibular, 3 vertical, 7 dental and 1 soft tissue parameters; 10 angular, 8 linear totally 18 cephalometric parameters were measured. Intra-class correlation coefficients were performed for both methods to assess the reliability of the measurements.Results:The results 9 of 18 parameters were found statistically significant. They were Cd-A distance, Cd-Gn distance, Go-Me distance, GoGnSN angle, ANS-Me distance, upper incisor-NA distance, lower incisor-NB distance, lower incisor-NB angle, overbite distance.Conclusion:Despite some discrepancies in measured values between hand-tracing cephalometric analysis method and the OnyxCeph cephalometric analysis method, statistical differences were minimal and only Cd-A, Cd-Gn, Go-Me, ANS-Me, GoGnSN° were clinically important for cephalometric analysis OnyxCeph was evaluated as an efficient method to replace conventional method.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T20:39:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-697bf2966d1f4880a06643da67dbbfab
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2528-9659
2148-9505
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T20:39:47Z
publishDate 2019-06-01
publisher Galenos Yayinevi
record_format Article
series Turkish Journal of Orthodontics
spelling doaj.art-697bf2966d1f4880a06643da67dbbfab2023-08-01T11:03:40ZengGalenos YayineviTurkish Journal of Orthodontics2528-96592148-95052019-06-01322879510.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.1803813049054Comparative Evaluation of Conventional and OnyxCeph™ Dental Software Measurements on Cephalometric RadiographyElif İzgi0Filiz Namdar Pekiner1 Department of Oral Diagnosis and Radiology, Marmara University School of Dentistry, İstanbul, Turkey Department of Oral Diagnosis and Radiology, Medipol University School of Dentistry, İstanbul, Turkey Objective:Cephalometry can be measured with traditionally conventional analysing methods (hand tracing), as well as using computers. Many dental softwares have been developed for this purpose. The reliability of these programs are often compared with the conventional method. The aim of the present study was to compare the conventional method of manual cephalometric analysis with a computerized one, OnyxCeph ™ (Image Instruments, Chemnitz, Germany) dental software.Methods:Lateral cephalometric radiographs of 150 patients (75 males and 75 females) age range 12-34 were traced by two methods. Conventional method and computerized (OnyxCeph) cephalometric analysis method. 2 maxillar, 3 mandibular, 2 maxillo-mandibular, 3 vertical, 7 dental and 1 soft tissue parameters; 10 angular, 8 linear totally 18 cephalometric parameters were measured. Intra-class correlation coefficients were performed for both methods to assess the reliability of the measurements.Results:The results 9 of 18 parameters were found statistically significant. They were Cd-A distance, Cd-Gn distance, Go-Me distance, GoGnSN angle, ANS-Me distance, upper incisor-NA distance, lower incisor-NB distance, lower incisor-NB angle, overbite distance.Conclusion:Despite some discrepancies in measured values between hand-tracing cephalometric analysis method and the OnyxCeph cephalometric analysis method, statistical differences were minimal and only Cd-A, Cd-Gn, Go-Me, ANS-Me, GoGnSN° were clinically important for cephalometric analysis OnyxCeph was evaluated as an efficient method to replace conventional method. http://www.turkjorthod.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/comparative-evaluation-of-conventional-and-onyxcep/53431 cephalometricsmanual tracingonyxcephcomputerized cephalometric programreliability
spellingShingle Elif İzgi
Filiz Namdar Pekiner
Comparative Evaluation of Conventional and OnyxCeph™ Dental Software Measurements on Cephalometric Radiography
Turkish Journal of Orthodontics
cephalometrics
manual tracing
onyxceph
computerized cephalometric program
reliability
title Comparative Evaluation of Conventional and OnyxCeph™ Dental Software Measurements on Cephalometric Radiography
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Conventional and OnyxCeph™ Dental Software Measurements on Cephalometric Radiography
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Conventional and OnyxCeph™ Dental Software Measurements on Cephalometric Radiography
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Conventional and OnyxCeph™ Dental Software Measurements on Cephalometric Radiography
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Conventional and OnyxCeph™ Dental Software Measurements on Cephalometric Radiography
title_sort comparative evaluation of conventional and onyxceph™ dental software measurements on cephalometric radiography
topic cephalometrics
manual tracing
onyxceph
computerized cephalometric program
reliability
url http://www.turkjorthod.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/comparative-evaluation-of-conventional-and-onyxcep/53431
work_keys_str_mv AT elifizgi comparativeevaluationofconventionalandonyxcephdentalsoftwaremeasurementsoncephalometricradiography
AT filiznamdarpekiner comparativeevaluationofconventionalandonyxcephdentalsoftwaremeasurementsoncephalometricradiography