Using the Ages & Stages Questionnaire to assess later effects of an infant intervention promoting language in primary care

Abstract Background Positive relational experiences during infancy have a profound impact on child development and are critical for future health and school readiness. We have been evaluating a simple finger puppet intervention that takes one minute and costs $1USD to deliver in the primary care set...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gretchen J. Domek, Lori Silveira, Helene Kuffel, Lauren Heller Szafran, Andrea Jimenez-Zambrano, Bonnie W. Camp
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-04-01
Series:BMC Pediatrics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-03953-y
_version_ 1797849835314872320
author Gretchen J. Domek
Lori Silveira
Helene Kuffel
Lauren Heller Szafran
Andrea Jimenez-Zambrano
Bonnie W. Camp
author_facet Gretchen J. Domek
Lori Silveira
Helene Kuffel
Lauren Heller Szafran
Andrea Jimenez-Zambrano
Bonnie W. Camp
author_sort Gretchen J. Domek
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Positive relational experiences during infancy have a profound impact on child development and are critical for future health and school readiness. We have been evaluating a simple finger puppet intervention that takes one minute and costs $1USD to deliver in the primary care setting to promote caregiver-infant interactions. We explored using developmental trajectories to determine later outcomes of our early intervention program by comparing trajectories to age 36 months to assess optimal intervention timing when delivered in early versus late infancy. Methods Three cohorts were enrolled and given a puppet at 2 months (early intervention) and 6 or 12 months (late intervention). Child development was assessed using the Ages & Stages Questionnaires (ASQ-3), which were independently collected during well visits. Scanned ASQ-3 forms from 2 to 36 months were obtained retrospectively through the electronic medical record. To compare longitudinal scores at different ages, all raw scores were first converted to z-scores. Longitudinal mixed effects models examined the trajectories of participant ASQ-3 scores over time by comparing the average intercepts and slopes. Results Of 180 children enrolled, 172 (96%) completed 2 or more ASQ-3 questionnaires and were included in the analysis, with a mean of 4.9 and a total of 843 questionnaires. Most children (85%) were on government-sponsored insurance. There were no statistical differences comparing cohort intercepts, while early intervention had a significant difference in slope compared to late intervention for the Personal-Social domain (0.12, p=0.018), resulting in higher predicted scores at 36 months. Early compared to late intervention had a difference in slope approaching significance for Communication (0.14, p=0.056) and the combined non-motor score (0.33, p=0.052). There were no significant differences in slope for Problem Solving (0.05, p=0.48), Gross Motor (-0.009, p=0.84), Fine Motor (0.06, p=0.22), and total ASQ-3 (0.32, p=0.17) scores. Conclusions Finger puppets may provide a simple and scalable way to encourage responsive caregiver-infant interactions promoting language and social-emotional development, especially when provided in early versus late infancy. Our trajectory analysis also demonstrates a useful and potentially cost-effective approach to evaluating long-term developmental outcomes of an early intervention.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T18:51:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-697ced3ca0c24e82bc6cdd0943ddd1dc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2431
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T18:51:40Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Pediatrics
spelling doaj.art-697ced3ca0c24e82bc6cdd0943ddd1dc2023-04-09T11:27:03ZengBMCBMC Pediatrics1471-24312023-04-0123111010.1186/s12887-023-03953-yUsing the Ages & Stages Questionnaire to assess later effects of an infant intervention promoting language in primary careGretchen J. Domek0Lori Silveira1Helene Kuffel2Lauren Heller Szafran3Andrea Jimenez-Zambrano4Bonnie W. Camp5Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical CampusDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical CampusUniversity of Colorado School of MedicineCenter for Global Health, Colorado School of Public HealthCenter for Global Health, Colorado School of Public HealthDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical CampusAbstract Background Positive relational experiences during infancy have a profound impact on child development and are critical for future health and school readiness. We have been evaluating a simple finger puppet intervention that takes one minute and costs $1USD to deliver in the primary care setting to promote caregiver-infant interactions. We explored using developmental trajectories to determine later outcomes of our early intervention program by comparing trajectories to age 36 months to assess optimal intervention timing when delivered in early versus late infancy. Methods Three cohorts were enrolled and given a puppet at 2 months (early intervention) and 6 or 12 months (late intervention). Child development was assessed using the Ages & Stages Questionnaires (ASQ-3), which were independently collected during well visits. Scanned ASQ-3 forms from 2 to 36 months were obtained retrospectively through the electronic medical record. To compare longitudinal scores at different ages, all raw scores were first converted to z-scores. Longitudinal mixed effects models examined the trajectories of participant ASQ-3 scores over time by comparing the average intercepts and slopes. Results Of 180 children enrolled, 172 (96%) completed 2 or more ASQ-3 questionnaires and were included in the analysis, with a mean of 4.9 and a total of 843 questionnaires. Most children (85%) were on government-sponsored insurance. There were no statistical differences comparing cohort intercepts, while early intervention had a significant difference in slope compared to late intervention for the Personal-Social domain (0.12, p=0.018), resulting in higher predicted scores at 36 months. Early compared to late intervention had a difference in slope approaching significance for Communication (0.14, p=0.056) and the combined non-motor score (0.33, p=0.052). There were no significant differences in slope for Problem Solving (0.05, p=0.48), Gross Motor (-0.009, p=0.84), Fine Motor (0.06, p=0.22), and total ASQ-3 (0.32, p=0.17) scores. Conclusions Finger puppets may provide a simple and scalable way to encourage responsive caregiver-infant interactions promoting language and social-emotional development, especially when provided in early versus late infancy. Our trajectory analysis also demonstrates a useful and potentially cost-effective approach to evaluating long-term developmental outcomes of an early intervention.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-03953-yInfant developmentLanguage developmentSocial-emotional developmentParent-child interactionPrimary health care
spellingShingle Gretchen J. Domek
Lori Silveira
Helene Kuffel
Lauren Heller Szafran
Andrea Jimenez-Zambrano
Bonnie W. Camp
Using the Ages & Stages Questionnaire to assess later effects of an infant intervention promoting language in primary care
BMC Pediatrics
Infant development
Language development
Social-emotional development
Parent-child interaction
Primary health care
title Using the Ages & Stages Questionnaire to assess later effects of an infant intervention promoting language in primary care
title_full Using the Ages & Stages Questionnaire to assess later effects of an infant intervention promoting language in primary care
title_fullStr Using the Ages & Stages Questionnaire to assess later effects of an infant intervention promoting language in primary care
title_full_unstemmed Using the Ages & Stages Questionnaire to assess later effects of an infant intervention promoting language in primary care
title_short Using the Ages & Stages Questionnaire to assess later effects of an infant intervention promoting language in primary care
title_sort using the ages stages questionnaire to assess later effects of an infant intervention promoting language in primary care
topic Infant development
Language development
Social-emotional development
Parent-child interaction
Primary health care
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-03953-y
work_keys_str_mv AT gretchenjdomek usingtheagesstagesquestionnairetoassesslatereffectsofaninfantinterventionpromotinglanguageinprimarycare
AT lorisilveira usingtheagesstagesquestionnairetoassesslatereffectsofaninfantinterventionpromotinglanguageinprimarycare
AT helenekuffel usingtheagesstagesquestionnairetoassesslatereffectsofaninfantinterventionpromotinglanguageinprimarycare
AT laurenhellerszafran usingtheagesstagesquestionnairetoassesslatereffectsofaninfantinterventionpromotinglanguageinprimarycare
AT andreajimenezzambrano usingtheagesstagesquestionnairetoassesslatereffectsofaninfantinterventionpromotinglanguageinprimarycare
AT bonniewcamp usingtheagesstagesquestionnairetoassesslatereffectsofaninfantinterventionpromotinglanguageinprimarycare