Pooling, Gaining or Losing Sovereignty? Conflicting Definitions of Irish Sovereignty in the Political Discourse on European Integration

This article aims at using the multi-faceted dimensions of the concept of sovereignty as a theoretical framework to better understand the Irish political discourse on European integration and to clarify the changing positions of various actors on the issue, notably in relation to the 2008 financial...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Charlotte Rault
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: European Federation of Associations and Centres of Irish Studies 2020-03-01
Series:Review of Irish Studies in Europe
Online Access:http://risejournal.eu/index.php/rise/article/view/2407/1900
_version_ 1818024500595261440
author Charlotte Rault
author_facet Charlotte Rault
author_sort Charlotte Rault
collection DOAJ
description This article aims at using the multi-faceted dimensions of the concept of sovereignty as a theoretical framework to better understand the Irish political discourse on European integration and to clarify the changing positions of various actors on the issue, notably in relation to the 2008 financial crisis. First, the article reminds the reader of the various definitions of sovereignty and how the old Westphalian definition has been recently challenged by international law and international relations scholars who consider the impact of globalisation and interdependence on state relations and who therefore question the mere existence of absolute sovereignty in today’s world. In a second part, the study analyses and categorises the arguments used during the referendum campaigns between 1972 and the financial crisis, in order to show how the concept of sovereignty contributed to fostering both pro- and anti-EU treaty positions. The third part will address the consequences of the financial crisis on the positioning of political actors. The debate on Ireland’s sovereignty was reinvigorated by the developments relating to the country’s economic situation and the EU/IMF bail-out package which considerably limited the ability of the government to determine its own economic policies. We will show that the ‘loss of sovereignty’ arguments gained ground among the traditionally pro-integration parties and groups. It reassessed the role of the citizen in legitimizing the decision-making process.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T04:01:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-69810902037b418ca9c38f76e5d69306
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2398-7685
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T04:01:12Z
publishDate 2020-03-01
publisher European Federation of Associations and Centres of Irish Studies
record_format Article
series Review of Irish Studies in Europe
spelling doaj.art-69810902037b418ca9c38f76e5d693062022-12-22T02:02:58ZengEuropean Federation of Associations and Centres of Irish StudiesReview of Irish Studies in Europe2398-76852020-03-0132108125https://doi.org/10.32803/rise.v3i2.2407Pooling, Gaining or Losing Sovereignty? Conflicting Definitions of Irish Sovereignty in the Political Discourse on European IntegrationCharlotte Rault 0Toulouse 1-Capitole UniversityThis article aims at using the multi-faceted dimensions of the concept of sovereignty as a theoretical framework to better understand the Irish political discourse on European integration and to clarify the changing positions of various actors on the issue, notably in relation to the 2008 financial crisis. First, the article reminds the reader of the various definitions of sovereignty and how the old Westphalian definition has been recently challenged by international law and international relations scholars who consider the impact of globalisation and interdependence on state relations and who therefore question the mere existence of absolute sovereignty in today’s world. In a second part, the study analyses and categorises the arguments used during the referendum campaigns between 1972 and the financial crisis, in order to show how the concept of sovereignty contributed to fostering both pro- and anti-EU treaty positions. The third part will address the consequences of the financial crisis on the positioning of political actors. The debate on Ireland’s sovereignty was reinvigorated by the developments relating to the country’s economic situation and the EU/IMF bail-out package which considerably limited the ability of the government to determine its own economic policies. We will show that the ‘loss of sovereignty’ arguments gained ground among the traditionally pro-integration parties and groups. It reassessed the role of the citizen in legitimizing the decision-making process.http://risejournal.eu/index.php/rise/article/view/2407/1900
spellingShingle Charlotte Rault
Pooling, Gaining or Losing Sovereignty? Conflicting Definitions of Irish Sovereignty in the Political Discourse on European Integration
Review of Irish Studies in Europe
title Pooling, Gaining or Losing Sovereignty? Conflicting Definitions of Irish Sovereignty in the Political Discourse on European Integration
title_full Pooling, Gaining or Losing Sovereignty? Conflicting Definitions of Irish Sovereignty in the Political Discourse on European Integration
title_fullStr Pooling, Gaining or Losing Sovereignty? Conflicting Definitions of Irish Sovereignty in the Political Discourse on European Integration
title_full_unstemmed Pooling, Gaining or Losing Sovereignty? Conflicting Definitions of Irish Sovereignty in the Political Discourse on European Integration
title_short Pooling, Gaining or Losing Sovereignty? Conflicting Definitions of Irish Sovereignty in the Political Discourse on European Integration
title_sort pooling gaining or losing sovereignty conflicting definitions of irish sovereignty in the political discourse on european integration
url http://risejournal.eu/index.php/rise/article/view/2407/1900
work_keys_str_mv AT charlotterault poolinggainingorlosingsovereigntyconflictingdefinitionsofirishsovereigntyinthepoliticaldiscourseoneuropeanintegration