Do community-based active case-finding interventions have indirect impacts on wider TB case detection and determinants of subsequent TB testing behaviour? A systematic review.

Community-based active case-finding (ACF) may have important impacts on routine TB case-detection and subsequent patient-initiated diagnosis pathways, contributing "indirectly" to infectious diseases prevention and care. We investigated the impact of ACF beyond directly diagnosed patients...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Helena R A Feasey, Rachael M Burke, Marriott Nliwasa, Lelia H Chaisson, Jonathan E Golub, Fahd Naufal, Adrienne E Shapiro, Maria Ruperez, Lily Telisinghe, Helen Ayles, Cecily Miller, Helen E D Burchett, Peter MacPherson, Elizabeth L Corbett
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLOS Global Public Health
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000088
_version_ 1797694180173021184
author Helena R A Feasey
Rachael M Burke
Marriott Nliwasa
Lelia H Chaisson
Jonathan E Golub
Fahd Naufal
Adrienne E Shapiro
Maria Ruperez
Lily Telisinghe
Helen Ayles
Cecily Miller
Helen E D Burchett
Peter MacPherson
Elizabeth L Corbett
author_facet Helena R A Feasey
Rachael M Burke
Marriott Nliwasa
Lelia H Chaisson
Jonathan E Golub
Fahd Naufal
Adrienne E Shapiro
Maria Ruperez
Lily Telisinghe
Helen Ayles
Cecily Miller
Helen E D Burchett
Peter MacPherson
Elizabeth L Corbett
author_sort Helena R A Feasey
collection DOAJ
description Community-based active case-finding (ACF) may have important impacts on routine TB case-detection and subsequent patient-initiated diagnosis pathways, contributing "indirectly" to infectious diseases prevention and care. We investigated the impact of ACF beyond directly diagnosed patients for TB, using routine case-notification rate (CNR) ratios as a measure of indirect effect. We systematically searched for publications 01-Jan-1980 to 13-Apr-2020 reporting on community-based ACF interventions compared to a comparison group, together with review of linked manuscripts reporting knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) outcomes or qualitative data on TB testing behaviour. We calculated CNR ratios of routine case-notifications (i.e. excluding cases identified directly through ACF) and compared proxy behavioural outcomes for both ACF and comparator communities. Full text manuscripts from 988 of 23,883 abstracts were screened for inclusion; 36 were eligible. Of these, 12 reported routine notification rates separately from ACF intervention-attributed rates, and one reported any proxy behavioural outcomes. Two further studies were identified from screening 1121 abstracts for linked KAP/qualitative manuscripts. 8/12 case-notification studies were considered at critical or serious risk of bias. 8/11 non-randomised studies reported bacteriologically-confirmed CNR ratios between 0.47 (95% CI:0.41-0.53) and 0.96 (95% CI:0.94-0.97), with 7/11 reporting all-form CNR ratios between 0.96 (95% CI:0.88-1.05) and 1.09 (95% CI:1.02-1.16). One high-quality randomised-controlled trial reported a ratio of 1.14 (95% CI 0.91-1.43). KAP/qualitative manuscripts provided insufficient evidence to establish the impact of ACF on subsequent TB testing behaviour. ACF interventions with routine CNR ratios >1 suggest an indirect effect on wider TB case-detection, potentially due to impact on subsequent TB testing behaviour through follow-up after a negative ACF test or increased TB knowledge. However, data on this type of impact are rarely collected. Evaluation of routine case-notification, testing and proxy behavioural outcomes in intervention and comparator communities should be included as standard methodology in future ACF campaign study designs.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T02:54:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-69853c1d5eb94dbeb59c2c5e09f2717b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2767-3375
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T02:54:11Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLOS Global Public Health
spelling doaj.art-69853c1d5eb94dbeb59c2c5e09f2717b2023-09-03T15:25:43ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLOS Global Public Health2767-33752021-01-01112e000008810.1371/journal.pgph.0000088Do community-based active case-finding interventions have indirect impacts on wider TB case detection and determinants of subsequent TB testing behaviour? A systematic review.Helena R A FeaseyRachael M BurkeMarriott NliwasaLelia H ChaissonJonathan E GolubFahd NaufalAdrienne E ShapiroMaria RuperezLily TelisingheHelen AylesCecily MillerHelen E D BurchettPeter MacPhersonElizabeth L CorbettCommunity-based active case-finding (ACF) may have important impacts on routine TB case-detection and subsequent patient-initiated diagnosis pathways, contributing "indirectly" to infectious diseases prevention and care. We investigated the impact of ACF beyond directly diagnosed patients for TB, using routine case-notification rate (CNR) ratios as a measure of indirect effect. We systematically searched for publications 01-Jan-1980 to 13-Apr-2020 reporting on community-based ACF interventions compared to a comparison group, together with review of linked manuscripts reporting knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) outcomes or qualitative data on TB testing behaviour. We calculated CNR ratios of routine case-notifications (i.e. excluding cases identified directly through ACF) and compared proxy behavioural outcomes for both ACF and comparator communities. Full text manuscripts from 988 of 23,883 abstracts were screened for inclusion; 36 were eligible. Of these, 12 reported routine notification rates separately from ACF intervention-attributed rates, and one reported any proxy behavioural outcomes. Two further studies were identified from screening 1121 abstracts for linked KAP/qualitative manuscripts. 8/12 case-notification studies were considered at critical or serious risk of bias. 8/11 non-randomised studies reported bacteriologically-confirmed CNR ratios between 0.47 (95% CI:0.41-0.53) and 0.96 (95% CI:0.94-0.97), with 7/11 reporting all-form CNR ratios between 0.96 (95% CI:0.88-1.05) and 1.09 (95% CI:1.02-1.16). One high-quality randomised-controlled trial reported a ratio of 1.14 (95% CI 0.91-1.43). KAP/qualitative manuscripts provided insufficient evidence to establish the impact of ACF on subsequent TB testing behaviour. ACF interventions with routine CNR ratios >1 suggest an indirect effect on wider TB case-detection, potentially due to impact on subsequent TB testing behaviour through follow-up after a negative ACF test or increased TB knowledge. However, data on this type of impact are rarely collected. Evaluation of routine case-notification, testing and proxy behavioural outcomes in intervention and comparator communities should be included as standard methodology in future ACF campaign study designs.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000088
spellingShingle Helena R A Feasey
Rachael M Burke
Marriott Nliwasa
Lelia H Chaisson
Jonathan E Golub
Fahd Naufal
Adrienne E Shapiro
Maria Ruperez
Lily Telisinghe
Helen Ayles
Cecily Miller
Helen E D Burchett
Peter MacPherson
Elizabeth L Corbett
Do community-based active case-finding interventions have indirect impacts on wider TB case detection and determinants of subsequent TB testing behaviour? A systematic review.
PLOS Global Public Health
title Do community-based active case-finding interventions have indirect impacts on wider TB case detection and determinants of subsequent TB testing behaviour? A systematic review.
title_full Do community-based active case-finding interventions have indirect impacts on wider TB case detection and determinants of subsequent TB testing behaviour? A systematic review.
title_fullStr Do community-based active case-finding interventions have indirect impacts on wider TB case detection and determinants of subsequent TB testing behaviour? A systematic review.
title_full_unstemmed Do community-based active case-finding interventions have indirect impacts on wider TB case detection and determinants of subsequent TB testing behaviour? A systematic review.
title_short Do community-based active case-finding interventions have indirect impacts on wider TB case detection and determinants of subsequent TB testing behaviour? A systematic review.
title_sort do community based active case finding interventions have indirect impacts on wider tb case detection and determinants of subsequent tb testing behaviour a systematic review
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000088
work_keys_str_mv AT helenarafeasey docommunitybasedactivecasefindinginterventionshaveindirectimpactsonwidertbcasedetectionanddeterminantsofsubsequenttbtestingbehaviourasystematicreview
AT rachaelmburke docommunitybasedactivecasefindinginterventionshaveindirectimpactsonwidertbcasedetectionanddeterminantsofsubsequenttbtestingbehaviourasystematicreview
AT marriottnliwasa docommunitybasedactivecasefindinginterventionshaveindirectimpactsonwidertbcasedetectionanddeterminantsofsubsequenttbtestingbehaviourasystematicreview
AT leliahchaisson docommunitybasedactivecasefindinginterventionshaveindirectimpactsonwidertbcasedetectionanddeterminantsofsubsequenttbtestingbehaviourasystematicreview
AT jonathanegolub docommunitybasedactivecasefindinginterventionshaveindirectimpactsonwidertbcasedetectionanddeterminantsofsubsequenttbtestingbehaviourasystematicreview
AT fahdnaufal docommunitybasedactivecasefindinginterventionshaveindirectimpactsonwidertbcasedetectionanddeterminantsofsubsequenttbtestingbehaviourasystematicreview
AT adrienneeshapiro docommunitybasedactivecasefindinginterventionshaveindirectimpactsonwidertbcasedetectionanddeterminantsofsubsequenttbtestingbehaviourasystematicreview
AT mariaruperez docommunitybasedactivecasefindinginterventionshaveindirectimpactsonwidertbcasedetectionanddeterminantsofsubsequenttbtestingbehaviourasystematicreview
AT lilytelisinghe docommunitybasedactivecasefindinginterventionshaveindirectimpactsonwidertbcasedetectionanddeterminantsofsubsequenttbtestingbehaviourasystematicreview
AT helenayles docommunitybasedactivecasefindinginterventionshaveindirectimpactsonwidertbcasedetectionanddeterminantsofsubsequenttbtestingbehaviourasystematicreview
AT cecilymiller docommunitybasedactivecasefindinginterventionshaveindirectimpactsonwidertbcasedetectionanddeterminantsofsubsequenttbtestingbehaviourasystematicreview
AT helenedburchett docommunitybasedactivecasefindinginterventionshaveindirectimpactsonwidertbcasedetectionanddeterminantsofsubsequenttbtestingbehaviourasystematicreview
AT petermacpherson docommunitybasedactivecasefindinginterventionshaveindirectimpactsonwidertbcasedetectionanddeterminantsofsubsequenttbtestingbehaviourasystematicreview
AT elizabethlcorbett docommunitybasedactivecasefindinginterventionshaveindirectimpactsonwidertbcasedetectionanddeterminantsofsubsequenttbtestingbehaviourasystematicreview