Comparison of terrain corrections based on the point source and line source DC methods

In the direct current (DC) exploration method, topographic relief distorts the apparent resistivity curve. To eliminate effects of terrain fluctuations, two undulating terrains comprising valleys and ridges were investigated in the present study. An unstructured triangular mesh method in which the w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Haijun Xie, Lu Li, Zhiqiang Li, Jingrui Li, Gang Li, Wanlu Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Earth Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2022.1004442/full
_version_ 1811265565631709184
author Haijun Xie
Haijun Xie
Lu Li
Zhiqiang Li
Jingrui Li
Gang Li
Wanlu Li
author_facet Haijun Xie
Haijun Xie
Lu Li
Zhiqiang Li
Jingrui Li
Gang Li
Wanlu Li
author_sort Haijun Xie
collection DOAJ
description In the direct current (DC) exploration method, topographic relief distorts the apparent resistivity curve. To eliminate effects of terrain fluctuations, two undulating terrains comprising valleys and ridges were investigated in the present study. An unstructured triangular mesh method in which the wave number k and its coefficient g were obtained using the integral method and the point and line source surveys were conducted using comsol multiphysics. Current sources were evaluated using two-dimensional (2-D) finite element forward modeling, whereas terrain correction was performed using both the comparison and conformal transformation methods. The results reveal comparable theoretical curves for the line and point sources, but quantitative characteristics of the curves differ. The comparison method is suitable for both curves, whereas the conformal transformation method is only applicable to the line source. Even though electric fields associated with the line and point sources differ, the comparison method that is based on the electrical cross-section curve of the line source and the electric profile curve of the point source remains effective.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T20:25:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-698673bfa78a487d9abd8f53530d2f46
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-6463
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T20:25:53Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Earth Science
spelling doaj.art-698673bfa78a487d9abd8f53530d2f462022-12-22T03:17:52ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Earth Science2296-64632022-09-011010.3389/feart.2022.10044421004442Comparison of terrain corrections based on the point source and line source DC methodsHaijun Xie0Haijun Xie1Lu Li2Zhiqiang Li3Jingrui Li4Gang Li5Wanlu Li6College of Geology and Environment, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an, ChinaCoal Resources Exploration and Comprehensive Utilization, Xi’an, ChinaCollege of Geology and Environment, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an, ChinaXi’an Research Institute China Coal Technology & Engineering Group Corp, Xi’an, ChinaShaanxi Coal Chemical Industry Technology Research Institute Co., Ltd, Xi’an, ChinaCollege of Geology and Environment, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an, ChinaCollege of Geology and Environment, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an, ChinaIn the direct current (DC) exploration method, topographic relief distorts the apparent resistivity curve. To eliminate effects of terrain fluctuations, two undulating terrains comprising valleys and ridges were investigated in the present study. An unstructured triangular mesh method in which the wave number k and its coefficient g were obtained using the integral method and the point and line source surveys were conducted using comsol multiphysics. Current sources were evaluated using two-dimensional (2-D) finite element forward modeling, whereas terrain correction was performed using both the comparison and conformal transformation methods. The results reveal comparable theoretical curves for the line and point sources, but quantitative characteristics of the curves differ. The comparison method is suitable for both curves, whereas the conformal transformation method is only applicable to the line source. Even though electric fields associated with the line and point sources differ, the comparison method that is based on the electrical cross-section curve of the line source and the electric profile curve of the point source remains effective.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2022.1004442/fullDC methodfinite elementcomparison methodconformal transformationterrain correction
spellingShingle Haijun Xie
Haijun Xie
Lu Li
Zhiqiang Li
Jingrui Li
Gang Li
Wanlu Li
Comparison of terrain corrections based on the point source and line source DC methods
Frontiers in Earth Science
DC method
finite element
comparison method
conformal transformation
terrain correction
title Comparison of terrain corrections based on the point source and line source DC methods
title_full Comparison of terrain corrections based on the point source and line source DC methods
title_fullStr Comparison of terrain corrections based on the point source and line source DC methods
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of terrain corrections based on the point source and line source DC methods
title_short Comparison of terrain corrections based on the point source and line source DC methods
title_sort comparison of terrain corrections based on the point source and line source dc methods
topic DC method
finite element
comparison method
conformal transformation
terrain correction
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2022.1004442/full
work_keys_str_mv AT haijunxie comparisonofterraincorrectionsbasedonthepointsourceandlinesourcedcmethods
AT haijunxie comparisonofterraincorrectionsbasedonthepointsourceandlinesourcedcmethods
AT luli comparisonofterraincorrectionsbasedonthepointsourceandlinesourcedcmethods
AT zhiqiangli comparisonofterraincorrectionsbasedonthepointsourceandlinesourcedcmethods
AT jingruili comparisonofterraincorrectionsbasedonthepointsourceandlinesourcedcmethods
AT gangli comparisonofterraincorrectionsbasedonthepointsourceandlinesourcedcmethods
AT wanluli comparisonofterraincorrectionsbasedonthepointsourceandlinesourcedcmethods