Comparison of intradialytic plasma volume change between online hemodiafiltration and standard hemodialysis

Abstract Background Intradialytic plasma volume change (IPVC) owing to ultrafiltration is a dominant cause of intradialytic hypotension (IDH). Lower occurrence of IDH in hemodiafiltration (HDF) than in standard hemodialysis (std-HD) indicates that HDF has preventive effect on IPVC. This study examin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Masayuki Tanemoto, Yu Ishimoto, Yukio Kosako, Yukio Okazaki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-11-01
Series:Renal Replacement Therapy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41100-018-0188-1
_version_ 1818843050109042688
author Masayuki Tanemoto
Yu Ishimoto
Yukio Kosako
Yukio Okazaki
author_facet Masayuki Tanemoto
Yu Ishimoto
Yukio Kosako
Yukio Okazaki
author_sort Masayuki Tanemoto
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Intradialytic plasma volume change (IPVC) owing to ultrafiltration is a dominant cause of intradialytic hypotension (IDH). Lower occurrence of IDH in hemodiafiltration (HDF) than in standard hemodialysis (std-HD) indicates that HDF has preventive effect on IPVC. This study examined whether online HDF (ol-HDF) prevented IPVC compared with std-HD. Methods In 115 std-HD, 59 push-pull ol-HDF (pp-ol-HDF), 39 pre-dilution ol-HDF (pre-ol-HDF), and 33 post-dilution ol-HDF (post-ol-HDF) sessions, we calculated IPVC using intradialytic change of hemoglobin (IPVCHb) and also using the change of hematocrit (IPVCHt), and compared them in association with intradialytic body weight loss (IBWL) between the dialysis modes. Results Both IPVCHb and IPVCHt were not different between the modes; in std-HD, pp-ol-HDF, pre-ol-HDF, and post-ol-HDF, IPVCHb were 0.10 ± 0.06, 0.11 ± 0.07, 0.10 ± 0.05, and 0.10 ± 0.06, respectively, and IPVCHt were 0.10 ± 0.07, 0.11 ± 0.07, 0.10 ± 0.06, and 0.10 ± 0.06, respectively. IPVCs divided by relative IBWL to DW (IBWL/DW) were also not different between the modes; in std-HD, pp-ol-HDF, pre-ol-HDF, and post-ol-HDF, IPVCHb/IBWL/DW were 1.9 ± 2.0, 1.7 ± 4.6, 2.1 ± 0.9, and 2.1 ± 1.8, respectively, and IPVCHt/IBWL/DW were 1.9 ± 2.2, 1.9 ± 3.7, 2.1 ± 1.1, and 2.1 ± 2.0, respectively. Conclusion Irrespective of the modes, ol-HDF has the same level of IPVC as std-HD.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T04:51:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-698d75a4702a47b29cec6fd812cc4368
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2059-1381
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T04:51:42Z
publishDate 2018-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Renal Replacement Therapy
spelling doaj.art-698d75a4702a47b29cec6fd812cc43682022-12-21T20:35:21ZengBMCRenal Replacement Therapy2059-13812018-11-01411610.1186/s41100-018-0188-1Comparison of intradialytic plasma volume change between online hemodiafiltration and standard hemodialysisMasayuki Tanemoto0Yu Ishimoto1Yukio Kosako2Yukio Okazaki3Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal MedicineDialysis Unit, Shin-Kuki General HospitalDialysis Unit, Shin-Kuki General HospitalDialysis Unit, Shin-Kuki General HospitalAbstract Background Intradialytic plasma volume change (IPVC) owing to ultrafiltration is a dominant cause of intradialytic hypotension (IDH). Lower occurrence of IDH in hemodiafiltration (HDF) than in standard hemodialysis (std-HD) indicates that HDF has preventive effect on IPVC. This study examined whether online HDF (ol-HDF) prevented IPVC compared with std-HD. Methods In 115 std-HD, 59 push-pull ol-HDF (pp-ol-HDF), 39 pre-dilution ol-HDF (pre-ol-HDF), and 33 post-dilution ol-HDF (post-ol-HDF) sessions, we calculated IPVC using intradialytic change of hemoglobin (IPVCHb) and also using the change of hematocrit (IPVCHt), and compared them in association with intradialytic body weight loss (IBWL) between the dialysis modes. Results Both IPVCHb and IPVCHt were not different between the modes; in std-HD, pp-ol-HDF, pre-ol-HDF, and post-ol-HDF, IPVCHb were 0.10 ± 0.06, 0.11 ± 0.07, 0.10 ± 0.05, and 0.10 ± 0.06, respectively, and IPVCHt were 0.10 ± 0.07, 0.11 ± 0.07, 0.10 ± 0.06, and 0.10 ± 0.06, respectively. IPVCs divided by relative IBWL to DW (IBWL/DW) were also not different between the modes; in std-HD, pp-ol-HDF, pre-ol-HDF, and post-ol-HDF, IPVCHb/IBWL/DW were 1.9 ± 2.0, 1.7 ± 4.6, 2.1 ± 0.9, and 2.1 ± 1.8, respectively, and IPVCHt/IBWL/DW were 1.9 ± 2.2, 1.9 ± 3.7, 2.1 ± 1.1, and 2.1 ± 2.0, respectively. Conclusion Irrespective of the modes, ol-HDF has the same level of IPVC as std-HD.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41100-018-0188-1HemodiafiltrationHemodialysisHypotensionPlasma volumeUltrafiltration
spellingShingle Masayuki Tanemoto
Yu Ishimoto
Yukio Kosako
Yukio Okazaki
Comparison of intradialytic plasma volume change between online hemodiafiltration and standard hemodialysis
Renal Replacement Therapy
Hemodiafiltration
Hemodialysis
Hypotension
Plasma volume
Ultrafiltration
title Comparison of intradialytic plasma volume change between online hemodiafiltration and standard hemodialysis
title_full Comparison of intradialytic plasma volume change between online hemodiafiltration and standard hemodialysis
title_fullStr Comparison of intradialytic plasma volume change between online hemodiafiltration and standard hemodialysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of intradialytic plasma volume change between online hemodiafiltration and standard hemodialysis
title_short Comparison of intradialytic plasma volume change between online hemodiafiltration and standard hemodialysis
title_sort comparison of intradialytic plasma volume change between online hemodiafiltration and standard hemodialysis
topic Hemodiafiltration
Hemodialysis
Hypotension
Plasma volume
Ultrafiltration
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41100-018-0188-1
work_keys_str_mv AT masayukitanemoto comparisonofintradialyticplasmavolumechangebetweenonlinehemodiafiltrationandstandardhemodialysis
AT yuishimoto comparisonofintradialyticplasmavolumechangebetweenonlinehemodiafiltrationandstandardhemodialysis
AT yukiokosako comparisonofintradialyticplasmavolumechangebetweenonlinehemodiafiltrationandstandardhemodialysis
AT yukiookazaki comparisonofintradialyticplasmavolumechangebetweenonlinehemodiafiltrationandstandardhemodialysis