Meta-Analysis of Effectiveness and Safety of Botulinum Toxin in the Treatment of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome

Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is characterized by pain, limited range of motion, swelling, skin changes, vasomotor instability, and patchy bone demineralization. Conservative management strategies for CRPS include physical and occupational therapy, psychosocial and behavioral therapy, and ph...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yu-Chi Su, Pei-Chun Hsieh, Yao-Hong Guo, Yu-Ching Lin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-12-01
Series:Life
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/12/12/2037
_version_ 1827638035896860672
author Yu-Chi Su
Pei-Chun Hsieh
Yao-Hong Guo
Yu-Ching Lin
author_facet Yu-Chi Su
Pei-Chun Hsieh
Yao-Hong Guo
Yu-Ching Lin
author_sort Yu-Chi Su
collection DOAJ
description Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is characterized by pain, limited range of motion, swelling, skin changes, vasomotor instability, and patchy bone demineralization. Conservative management strategies for CRPS include physical and occupational therapy, psychosocial and behavioral therapy, and pharmacotherapy. However, some patients still experience CRPS symptoms after receiving conventional treatments. Therefore, botulinum toxin (BoNT) has been applied to patients with CRPS in several trials considering its analgesic effect in musculoskeletal and neuropathic pain; however, the results were controversial. We conducted the study to explore the effectiveness and safety of BoNT in patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). A search was performed using the following electronic databases up to 19 October 2022: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. We included both randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized controlled studies involving patients with complex regional pain syndrome managed with botulinum toxin. Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist were used for quality assessment for randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies. Only randomized controlled trials entered the meta-analysis. The primary outcome was the visual analogue scale of pain presented as a weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The secondary outcome was the risk of adverse events presented as an odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI. We analyzed eight articles with 176 patients, including three randomized controlled trials with 62 participants. The age of the patients ranged from 23.8 to 51 years old. The duration of the disease ranged from 2.2 to 11.8 years. The proportion of females ranged from 16.6% to 100%. The route of administration of BoNT included: (1) lumbar sympathetic block (LSB), (2) intramuscular injection, (3) subcutaneous or intradermal injection (SC/ID). Improvement in pain was revealed in six studies, and adverse events were all self-limited and temporary. Meta-analysis revealed a significant reduction in pain at the first follow-up between 3 weeks to 1 month after intervention (WMD, −1.036, 95% CI, −1.673 to −0.400) but not at the second follow-up between 2 to 3 months after treatment (WMD, −0.895, 95% CI, −2.249 to 0.458). Subgroup analyses between LSB and SC/ID were nonsignificant at both follow-up periods (<i>p</i> = 0.422, 0.139). The risk of adverse events was similar between the BoNT and control group (OR, 0.698, 95% CI, 0.136 to 3.581). In conclusion, BoNT may be effective and safe for alleviating pain in patients with CRPS. However, we could not draw definite conclusions due to small sample size and high between-study heterogeneity. The limited number of participants may conceal the possibility of serious adverse events. Further large-scale randomized controlled trials are warranted to delineate the role of BoNT in CRPS.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T16:10:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-699258394b974d8f99bc07984edd3e38
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-1729
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T16:10:59Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Life
spelling doaj.art-699258394b974d8f99bc07984edd3e382023-11-24T16:12:29ZengMDPI AGLife2075-17292022-12-011212203710.3390/life12122037Meta-Analysis of Effectiveness and Safety of Botulinum Toxin in the Treatment of Complex Regional Pain SyndromeYu-Chi Su0Pei-Chun Hsieh1Yao-Hong Guo2Yu-Ching Lin3Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101, TaiwanDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101, TaiwanDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101, TaiwanDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101, TaiwanComplex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is characterized by pain, limited range of motion, swelling, skin changes, vasomotor instability, and patchy bone demineralization. Conservative management strategies for CRPS include physical and occupational therapy, psychosocial and behavioral therapy, and pharmacotherapy. However, some patients still experience CRPS symptoms after receiving conventional treatments. Therefore, botulinum toxin (BoNT) has been applied to patients with CRPS in several trials considering its analgesic effect in musculoskeletal and neuropathic pain; however, the results were controversial. We conducted the study to explore the effectiveness and safety of BoNT in patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). A search was performed using the following electronic databases up to 19 October 2022: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. We included both randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized controlled studies involving patients with complex regional pain syndrome managed with botulinum toxin. Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist were used for quality assessment for randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies. Only randomized controlled trials entered the meta-analysis. The primary outcome was the visual analogue scale of pain presented as a weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The secondary outcome was the risk of adverse events presented as an odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI. We analyzed eight articles with 176 patients, including three randomized controlled trials with 62 participants. The age of the patients ranged from 23.8 to 51 years old. The duration of the disease ranged from 2.2 to 11.8 years. The proportion of females ranged from 16.6% to 100%. The route of administration of BoNT included: (1) lumbar sympathetic block (LSB), (2) intramuscular injection, (3) subcutaneous or intradermal injection (SC/ID). Improvement in pain was revealed in six studies, and adverse events were all self-limited and temporary. Meta-analysis revealed a significant reduction in pain at the first follow-up between 3 weeks to 1 month after intervention (WMD, −1.036, 95% CI, −1.673 to −0.400) but not at the second follow-up between 2 to 3 months after treatment (WMD, −0.895, 95% CI, −2.249 to 0.458). Subgroup analyses between LSB and SC/ID were nonsignificant at both follow-up periods (<i>p</i> = 0.422, 0.139). The risk of adverse events was similar between the BoNT and control group (OR, 0.698, 95% CI, 0.136 to 3.581). In conclusion, BoNT may be effective and safe for alleviating pain in patients with CRPS. However, we could not draw definite conclusions due to small sample size and high between-study heterogeneity. The limited number of participants may conceal the possibility of serious adverse events. Further large-scale randomized controlled trials are warranted to delineate the role of BoNT in CRPS.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/12/12/2037complex regional pain syndromebotulinum toxinmeta-analysislumbar sympathetic block
spellingShingle Yu-Chi Su
Pei-Chun Hsieh
Yao-Hong Guo
Yu-Ching Lin
Meta-Analysis of Effectiveness and Safety of Botulinum Toxin in the Treatment of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
Life
complex regional pain syndrome
botulinum toxin
meta-analysis
lumbar sympathetic block
title Meta-Analysis of Effectiveness and Safety of Botulinum Toxin in the Treatment of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
title_full Meta-Analysis of Effectiveness and Safety of Botulinum Toxin in the Treatment of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
title_fullStr Meta-Analysis of Effectiveness and Safety of Botulinum Toxin in the Treatment of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Meta-Analysis of Effectiveness and Safety of Botulinum Toxin in the Treatment of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
title_short Meta-Analysis of Effectiveness and Safety of Botulinum Toxin in the Treatment of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
title_sort meta analysis of effectiveness and safety of botulinum toxin in the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome
topic complex regional pain syndrome
botulinum toxin
meta-analysis
lumbar sympathetic block
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/12/12/2037
work_keys_str_mv AT yuchisu metaanalysisofeffectivenessandsafetyofbotulinumtoxininthetreatmentofcomplexregionalpainsyndrome
AT peichunhsieh metaanalysisofeffectivenessandsafetyofbotulinumtoxininthetreatmentofcomplexregionalpainsyndrome
AT yaohongguo metaanalysisofeffectivenessandsafetyofbotulinumtoxininthetreatmentofcomplexregionalpainsyndrome
AT yuchinglin metaanalysisofeffectivenessandsafetyofbotulinumtoxininthetreatmentofcomplexregionalpainsyndrome