Human dimensions of grizzly bear conservation: The social factors underlying satisfaction and coexistence beliefs in Montana, USA

Abstract Coexistence between large carnivores and humans is a global conservation concern. Montana (USA) is home to recovering grizzly bear (Ursus arctos) populations and increasing human–grizzly interactions. In 2019, we administered a survey of Montanans to investigate factors influencing normativ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Holly K. Nesbitt, Alexander L. Metcalf, Elizabeth Covelli Metcalf, Cecily M. Costello, Lori L. Roberts, Mike S. Lewis, Justin A. Gude
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-03-01
Series:Conservation Science and Practice
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12885
_version_ 1811161136908730368
author Holly K. Nesbitt
Alexander L. Metcalf
Elizabeth Covelli Metcalf
Cecily M. Costello
Lori L. Roberts
Mike S. Lewis
Justin A. Gude
author_facet Holly K. Nesbitt
Alexander L. Metcalf
Elizabeth Covelli Metcalf
Cecily M. Costello
Lori L. Roberts
Mike S. Lewis
Justin A. Gude
author_sort Holly K. Nesbitt
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Coexistence between large carnivores and humans is a global conservation concern. Montana (USA) is home to recovering grizzly bear (Ursus arctos) populations and increasing human–grizzly interactions. In 2019, we administered a survey of Montanans to investigate factors influencing normative beliefs about grizzly bear population sizes and quantify the relationship between these beliefs and satisfaction with grizzly management in the state. Using a linear regression (r2 = .61), we found that residents with positive attitudes and emotional dispositions toward grizzlies or who trusted the agency were more likely to believe grizzly populations were too low. Residents who believed hunting should be used to manage conflict, were themselves hunters, had vicarious wildlife experience with property damage, believed grizzly populations were expanding, or were older were more likely to believe populations were too high. We found a negative quadratic relationship between normative grizzly bear population size beliefs and satisfaction with management, suggesting an optimal “Goldilocks” zone where coexistence is most possible. In practice, if observed Goldilocks zones are incompatible with population numbers required to meet conservation goals, considering factors influencing these beliefs may help bolster acceptance of larger population sizes.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T06:10:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-69ab1b09a2bd4e758102d2b487463af1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2578-4854
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T06:10:39Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Conservation Science and Practice
spelling doaj.art-69ab1b09a2bd4e758102d2b487463af12023-03-02T18:50:02ZengWileyConservation Science and Practice2578-48542023-03-0153n/an/a10.1111/csp2.12885Human dimensions of grizzly bear conservation: The social factors underlying satisfaction and coexistence beliefs in Montana, USAHolly K. Nesbitt0Alexander L. Metcalf1Elizabeth Covelli Metcalf2Cecily M. Costello3Lori L. Roberts4Mike S. Lewis5Justin A. Gude6Department of Society & Conservation, WA Franke College of Forestry & Conservation University of Montana Montana USADepartment of Society & Conservation, WA Franke College of Forestry & Conservation University of Montana Montana USADepartment of Society & Conservation, WA Franke College of Forestry & Conservation University of Montana Montana USAMontana Department of Fish, Wildlife, & Parks Helena Montana USAMontana Department of Fish, Wildlife, & Parks Helena Montana USAMontana Department of Fish, Wildlife, & Parks Helena Montana USAMontana Department of Fish, Wildlife, & Parks Helena Montana USAAbstract Coexistence between large carnivores and humans is a global conservation concern. Montana (USA) is home to recovering grizzly bear (Ursus arctos) populations and increasing human–grizzly interactions. In 2019, we administered a survey of Montanans to investigate factors influencing normative beliefs about grizzly bear population sizes and quantify the relationship between these beliefs and satisfaction with grizzly management in the state. Using a linear regression (r2 = .61), we found that residents with positive attitudes and emotional dispositions toward grizzlies or who trusted the agency were more likely to believe grizzly populations were too low. Residents who believed hunting should be used to manage conflict, were themselves hunters, had vicarious wildlife experience with property damage, believed grizzly populations were expanding, or were older were more likely to believe populations were too high. We found a negative quadratic relationship between normative grizzly bear population size beliefs and satisfaction with management, suggesting an optimal “Goldilocks” zone where coexistence is most possible. In practice, if observed Goldilocks zones are incompatible with population numbers required to meet conservation goals, considering factors influencing these beliefs may help bolster acceptance of larger population sizes.https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12885acceptancecoexistenceconflictgrizzly bearhuntinglarge carnivores
spellingShingle Holly K. Nesbitt
Alexander L. Metcalf
Elizabeth Covelli Metcalf
Cecily M. Costello
Lori L. Roberts
Mike S. Lewis
Justin A. Gude
Human dimensions of grizzly bear conservation: The social factors underlying satisfaction and coexistence beliefs in Montana, USA
Conservation Science and Practice
acceptance
coexistence
conflict
grizzly bear
hunting
large carnivores
title Human dimensions of grizzly bear conservation: The social factors underlying satisfaction and coexistence beliefs in Montana, USA
title_full Human dimensions of grizzly bear conservation: The social factors underlying satisfaction and coexistence beliefs in Montana, USA
title_fullStr Human dimensions of grizzly bear conservation: The social factors underlying satisfaction and coexistence beliefs in Montana, USA
title_full_unstemmed Human dimensions of grizzly bear conservation: The social factors underlying satisfaction and coexistence beliefs in Montana, USA
title_short Human dimensions of grizzly bear conservation: The social factors underlying satisfaction and coexistence beliefs in Montana, USA
title_sort human dimensions of grizzly bear conservation the social factors underlying satisfaction and coexistence beliefs in montana usa
topic acceptance
coexistence
conflict
grizzly bear
hunting
large carnivores
url https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12885
work_keys_str_mv AT hollyknesbitt humandimensionsofgrizzlybearconservationthesocialfactorsunderlyingsatisfactionandcoexistencebeliefsinmontanausa
AT alexanderlmetcalf humandimensionsofgrizzlybearconservationthesocialfactorsunderlyingsatisfactionandcoexistencebeliefsinmontanausa
AT elizabethcovellimetcalf humandimensionsofgrizzlybearconservationthesocialfactorsunderlyingsatisfactionandcoexistencebeliefsinmontanausa
AT cecilymcostello humandimensionsofgrizzlybearconservationthesocialfactorsunderlyingsatisfactionandcoexistencebeliefsinmontanausa
AT lorilroberts humandimensionsofgrizzlybearconservationthesocialfactorsunderlyingsatisfactionandcoexistencebeliefsinmontanausa
AT mikeslewis humandimensionsofgrizzlybearconservationthesocialfactorsunderlyingsatisfactionandcoexistencebeliefsinmontanausa
AT justinagude humandimensionsofgrizzlybearconservationthesocialfactorsunderlyingsatisfactionandcoexistencebeliefsinmontanausa