Clinical audits – A quality improvement tool in transfusion medicine

A clinical audit is a quality improvement process that seeks to improve services and outcomes through a systematic review of care against explicit criteria. It is now a recognized tool for improving clinical quality of care. However, in transfusion medicine, they have been utilized in a limited mann...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Monica Gupta, Mustafa F Ranapurwala
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2022-01-01
Series:Global Journal of Transfusion Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.gjtmonline.com/article.asp?issn=2468-8398;year=2022;volume=7;issue=2;spage=115;epage=122;aulast=Gupta
_version_ 1811220857374113792
author Monica Gupta
Mustafa F Ranapurwala
author_facet Monica Gupta
Mustafa F Ranapurwala
author_sort Monica Gupta
collection DOAJ
description A clinical audit is a quality improvement process that seeks to improve services and outcomes through a systematic review of care against explicit criteria. It is now a recognized tool for improving clinical quality of care. However, in transfusion medicine, they have been utilized in a limited manner. This review intends to discuss the methodology of carrying out a clinical audit systematically. Clinical audit is not research and focuses on the improvement of ordinary and routine practices. Various methodologies for selecting and prioritizing a good audit topic can be employed. Based on the Donabedian model, process-based audits from donor selection to the actual bedside transfusion could be audited to bring in improvement. Likewise, transfusion processes can be audited based on the dimensions of quality in the context of timeliness, effectiveness, and appropriateness. Prioritization of a topic can be done through a quality impact assessment. The objectives help quantify the aim of the audit, while the standards include criteria that are quantified against targets, based on the current evidence for the best possible care. A snapshot sample (20–50 cases) is sufficient to carry out a clinical audit. Where targets are not met, root-cause analysis and quality improvement tools guide the implementation of changes in transfusion practices. To ensure that change is implemented and internalized, it is necessary to have the entire team and the management on board; communication with all stakeholders is key. Re-audit, after the change has been internalized, is an essential part of all clinical audits. Meticulously planning and proper implementation ensure improvement of the care that transfused patients receive.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T07:50:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-69b979fd453b42e890d9d1585e91eb98
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2468-8398
2455-8893
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T07:50:01Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Global Journal of Transfusion Medicine
spelling doaj.art-69b979fd453b42e890d9d1585e91eb982022-12-22T03:41:37ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsGlobal Journal of Transfusion Medicine2468-83982455-88932022-01-017211512210.4103/gjtm.gjtm_54_22Clinical audits – A quality improvement tool in transfusion medicineMonica GuptaMustafa F RanapurwalaA clinical audit is a quality improvement process that seeks to improve services and outcomes through a systematic review of care against explicit criteria. It is now a recognized tool for improving clinical quality of care. However, in transfusion medicine, they have been utilized in a limited manner. This review intends to discuss the methodology of carrying out a clinical audit systematically. Clinical audit is not research and focuses on the improvement of ordinary and routine practices. Various methodologies for selecting and prioritizing a good audit topic can be employed. Based on the Donabedian model, process-based audits from donor selection to the actual bedside transfusion could be audited to bring in improvement. Likewise, transfusion processes can be audited based on the dimensions of quality in the context of timeliness, effectiveness, and appropriateness. Prioritization of a topic can be done through a quality impact assessment. The objectives help quantify the aim of the audit, while the standards include criteria that are quantified against targets, based on the current evidence for the best possible care. A snapshot sample (20–50 cases) is sufficient to carry out a clinical audit. Where targets are not met, root-cause analysis and quality improvement tools guide the implementation of changes in transfusion practices. To ensure that change is implemented and internalized, it is necessary to have the entire team and the management on board; communication with all stakeholders is key. Re-audit, after the change has been internalized, is an essential part of all clinical audits. Meticulously planning and proper implementation ensure improvement of the care that transfused patients receive.http://www.gjtmonline.com/article.asp?issn=2468-8398;year=2022;volume=7;issue=2;spage=115;epage=122;aulast=Guptaclinical auditquality improvementstandards-criterion-target-evidencetransfusion medicine
spellingShingle Monica Gupta
Mustafa F Ranapurwala
Clinical audits – A quality improvement tool in transfusion medicine
Global Journal of Transfusion Medicine
clinical audit
quality improvement
standards-criterion-target-evidence
transfusion medicine
title Clinical audits – A quality improvement tool in transfusion medicine
title_full Clinical audits – A quality improvement tool in transfusion medicine
title_fullStr Clinical audits – A quality improvement tool in transfusion medicine
title_full_unstemmed Clinical audits – A quality improvement tool in transfusion medicine
title_short Clinical audits – A quality improvement tool in transfusion medicine
title_sort clinical audits a quality improvement tool in transfusion medicine
topic clinical audit
quality improvement
standards-criterion-target-evidence
transfusion medicine
url http://www.gjtmonline.com/article.asp?issn=2468-8398;year=2022;volume=7;issue=2;spage=115;epage=122;aulast=Gupta
work_keys_str_mv AT monicagupta clinicalauditsaqualityimprovementtoolintransfusionmedicine
AT mustafafranapurwala clinicalauditsaqualityimprovementtoolintransfusionmedicine