History of development and comparative evaluation of modern stents for coronary arteries

Operations of myocardial revascularization include aorta-coronary or mammarocoronary bypassing and stenting of coronary arteries. Currently, coronary stenting is the most common method of revascularization, but during the operation of this method, the incidence of late complications, such as resteno...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: K. A. Smirnov, A. V. Biryukov, R. D. Ivanchenko, D. V. Ovcharenko, A. A. Voronkov, I. S. Trusov, E. M. Nifontov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Meshalkin National Medical Research Center 2019-05-01
Series:Патология кровообращения и кардиохирургия
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journalmeshalkin.ru/index.php/heartjournal/article/view/646
_version_ 1797725739631509504
author K. A. Smirnov
A. V. Biryukov
R. D. Ivanchenko
D. V. Ovcharenko
A. A. Voronkov
I. S. Trusov
E. M. Nifontov
author_facet K. A. Smirnov
A. V. Biryukov
R. D. Ivanchenko
D. V. Ovcharenko
A. A. Voronkov
I. S. Trusov
E. M. Nifontov
author_sort K. A. Smirnov
collection DOAJ
description Operations of myocardial revascularization include aorta-coronary or mammarocoronary bypassing and stenting of coronary arteries. Currently, coronary stenting is the most common method of revascularization, but during the operation of this method, the incidence of late complications, such as restenoses and late coronary thrombosis, has increased. The causes of these complications depend on a number of factors, including the type of stent. While vessel wall injury correlated with restenosis in the bare metal stents (BMS) era, its impact has been minimised by the use of drug eluting stents (DES), which is likely related to the use of powerful antiproliferatives with prolonged release kinetics which profoundly inhibit the reparative response to arterial injury. However, at the same time, vessel injury secondary to drug toxicity or inflammation caused by polymer is observed following DES implantation. In the clinical practice, there is a huge variety of types and models of stents, which have different indications and contraindications for use. An important factor influencing the risk of developing late complications is neointimal vascular healing, which can be assessed using various methods of intravascular imaging, such as optical coherent tomography. The purpose of this literature review, describing the evolution of coronary stents, is to systematize the main research results on the use of various stents platforms. In addition, the review presents the modern methods of evaluating the proliferation neontimy, and introduces the concept of healing index (healing score), reflects the process of vascular healing and influencing the characteristics and duration of dual antiplatelet therapy
first_indexed 2024-03-12T10:35:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-69bc9e276aa44be8b2be600ed01d262a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1681-3472
2500-3119
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T10:35:36Z
publishDate 2019-05-01
publisher Meshalkin National Medical Research Center
record_format Article
series Патология кровообращения и кардиохирургия
spelling doaj.art-69bc9e276aa44be8b2be600ed01d262a2023-09-02T08:46:41ZengMeshalkin National Medical Research CenterПатология кровообращения и кардиохирургия1681-34722500-31192019-05-01231S10.21688/1681-3472-2019-1S-S9-S171232History of development and comparative evaluation of modern stents for coronary arteriesK. A. Smirnov0A. V. Biryukov1R. D. Ivanchenko2D. V. Ovcharenko3A. A. Voronkov4I. S. Trusov5E. M. Nifontov6ФГБОУ ВО «Первый Санкт-Петербургский государственный медицинский университет имени академика И.П. Павлова» Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации, Санкт-Петербург, Российская ФедерацияФГБОУ ВО «Первый Санкт-Петербургский государственный медицинский университет имени академика И.П. Павлова» Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации, Санкт-Петербург, Российская ФедерацияФГБОУ ВО «Первый Санкт-Петербургский государственный медицинский университет имени академика И.П. Павлова» Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации, Санкт-Петербург, Российская ФедерацияФГБОУ ВО «Первый Санкт-Петербургский государственный медицинский университет имени академика И.П. Павлова» Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации, Санкт-Петербург, Российская ФедерацияФГБОУ ВО «Первый Санкт-Петербургский государственный медицинский университет имени академика И.П. Павлова» Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации, Санкт-Петербург, Российская ФедерацияФГБОУ ВО «Первый Санкт-Петербургский государственный медицинский университет имени академика И.П. Павлова» Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации, Санкт-Петербург, Российская ФедерацияФГБОУ ВО «Первый Санкт-Петербургский государственный медицинский университет имени академика И.П. Павлова» Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации, Санкт-Петербург, Российская ФедерацияOperations of myocardial revascularization include aorta-coronary or mammarocoronary bypassing and stenting of coronary arteries. Currently, coronary stenting is the most common method of revascularization, but during the operation of this method, the incidence of late complications, such as restenoses and late coronary thrombosis, has increased. The causes of these complications depend on a number of factors, including the type of stent. While vessel wall injury correlated with restenosis in the bare metal stents (BMS) era, its impact has been minimised by the use of drug eluting stents (DES), which is likely related to the use of powerful antiproliferatives with prolonged release kinetics which profoundly inhibit the reparative response to arterial injury. However, at the same time, vessel injury secondary to drug toxicity or inflammation caused by polymer is observed following DES implantation. In the clinical practice, there is a huge variety of types and models of stents, which have different indications and contraindications for use. An important factor influencing the risk of developing late complications is neointimal vascular healing, which can be assessed using various methods of intravascular imaging, such as optical coherent tomography. The purpose of this literature review, describing the evolution of coronary stents, is to systematize the main research results on the use of various stents platforms. In addition, the review presents the modern methods of evaluating the proliferation neontimy, and introduces the concept of healing index (healing score), reflects the process of vascular healing and influencing the characteristics and duration of dual antiplatelet therapyhttps://journalmeshalkin.ru/index.php/heartjournal/article/view/646голометаллический стентиндекс сосудистого заживленияоптическая когерентная томографиястент с лекарственным покрытиемстентированиесосудистое заживлениесосудистый каркас
spellingShingle K. A. Smirnov
A. V. Biryukov
R. D. Ivanchenko
D. V. Ovcharenko
A. A. Voronkov
I. S. Trusov
E. M. Nifontov
History of development and comparative evaluation of modern stents for coronary arteries
Патология кровообращения и кардиохирургия
голометаллический стент
индекс сосудистого заживления
оптическая когерентная томография
стент с лекарственным покрытием
стентирование
сосудистое заживление
сосудистый каркас
title History of development and comparative evaluation of modern stents for coronary arteries
title_full History of development and comparative evaluation of modern stents for coronary arteries
title_fullStr History of development and comparative evaluation of modern stents for coronary arteries
title_full_unstemmed History of development and comparative evaluation of modern stents for coronary arteries
title_short History of development and comparative evaluation of modern stents for coronary arteries
title_sort history of development and comparative evaluation of modern stents for coronary arteries
topic голометаллический стент
индекс сосудистого заживления
оптическая когерентная томография
стент с лекарственным покрытием
стентирование
сосудистое заживление
сосудистый каркас
url https://journalmeshalkin.ru/index.php/heartjournal/article/view/646
work_keys_str_mv AT kasmirnov historyofdevelopmentandcomparativeevaluationofmodernstentsforcoronaryarteries
AT avbiryukov historyofdevelopmentandcomparativeevaluationofmodernstentsforcoronaryarteries
AT rdivanchenko historyofdevelopmentandcomparativeevaluationofmodernstentsforcoronaryarteries
AT dvovcharenko historyofdevelopmentandcomparativeevaluationofmodernstentsforcoronaryarteries
AT aavoronkov historyofdevelopmentandcomparativeevaluationofmodernstentsforcoronaryarteries
AT istrusov historyofdevelopmentandcomparativeevaluationofmodernstentsforcoronaryarteries
AT emnifontov historyofdevelopmentandcomparativeevaluationofmodernstentsforcoronaryarteries