Comparison of original and alternative incremental sit-to-stand exercise protocol for anaerobic threshold assessment

Anaerobic threshold (AT) is an established parameter of aerobic fitness. The incremental sit-to-stand exercise (ISTS), using one of the activities of daily living, is used to assess physical capacity in patients who are unable to safely pedal or walk. However, the effect of an alternative ISTS proto...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Keisuke Nakamura, Yuya Nagasawa, Shoji Sawaki, Yoshihiko Yokokawa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Japanese Society of Physical Fitness and Sports Medicine 2020-03-01
Series:Journal of Physical Fitness and Sports Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jpfsm/9/2/9_83/_pdf/-char/en
_version_ 1819136157741481984
author Keisuke Nakamura
Yuya Nagasawa
Shoji Sawaki
Yoshihiko Yokokawa
author_facet Keisuke Nakamura
Yuya Nagasawa
Shoji Sawaki
Yoshihiko Yokokawa
author_sort Keisuke Nakamura
collection DOAJ
description Anaerobic threshold (AT) is an established parameter of aerobic fitness. The incremental sit-to-stand exercise (ISTS), using one of the activities of daily living, is used to assess physical capacity in patients who are unable to safely pedal or walk. However, the effect of an alternative ISTS protocol on AT remains unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of the original ISTS protocol with an alternative shortened ISTS protocol on AT values in healthy young adults, and to assess the difference in AT values obtained during the ISTS protocols and the cycle ergometer test. Twelve healthy young adults (mean [range] age: 26.8 [22–33] years, 6 men and 6 women) performed the shortened version of the ISTS (S-ISTS), the original version of ISTS (O-ISTS), and cycle ergometer (CE) tests in a randomized order. The AT values of participants were measured during each of the three tests. No significant difference in AT values was observed among the three tests. AT obtained by individuals in the S-ISTS was significantly correlated with that obtained during the O-ISTS and CE tests with r values of 0.96 and 0.81, respectively (p < 0.05). Similar to the O-ISTS and CE test, the S-ISTS test may be used as an exercise test for the assessment of AT in a clinical setting.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T10:30:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-69c5ad828ae04a27b8afa8a5a61bc10a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2186-8131
2186-8123
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T10:30:31Z
publishDate 2020-03-01
publisher Japanese Society of Physical Fitness and Sports Medicine
record_format Article
series Journal of Physical Fitness and Sports Medicine
spelling doaj.art-69c5ad828ae04a27b8afa8a5a61bc10a2022-12-21T18:29:20ZengJapanese Society of Physical Fitness and Sports MedicineJournal of Physical Fitness and Sports Medicine2186-81312186-81232020-03-0192838810.7600/jpfsm.9.83jpfsmComparison of original and alternative incremental sit-to-stand exercise protocol for anaerobic threshold assessmentKeisuke Nakamura0Yuya Nagasawa1Shoji Sawaki2Yoshihiko Yokokawa3Department of Rehabilitation, Matsumoto City HospitalDepartment of Rehabilitation, Matsumoto City HospitalDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Matsumoto City HospitalDepartment of Physical Therapy, Shinshu UniversityAnaerobic threshold (AT) is an established parameter of aerobic fitness. The incremental sit-to-stand exercise (ISTS), using one of the activities of daily living, is used to assess physical capacity in patients who are unable to safely pedal or walk. However, the effect of an alternative ISTS protocol on AT remains unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of the original ISTS protocol with an alternative shortened ISTS protocol on AT values in healthy young adults, and to assess the difference in AT values obtained during the ISTS protocols and the cycle ergometer test. Twelve healthy young adults (mean [range] age: 26.8 [22–33] years, 6 men and 6 women) performed the shortened version of the ISTS (S-ISTS), the original version of ISTS (O-ISTS), and cycle ergometer (CE) tests in a randomized order. The AT values of participants were measured during each of the three tests. No significant difference in AT values was observed among the three tests. AT obtained by individuals in the S-ISTS was significantly correlated with that obtained during the O-ISTS and CE tests with r values of 0.96 and 0.81, respectively (p < 0.05). Similar to the O-ISTS and CE test, the S-ISTS test may be used as an exercise test for the assessment of AT in a clinical setting.https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jpfsm/9/2/9_83/_pdf/-char/enshortened incremental sit-to-stand testanaerobic thresholdfitness assessment
spellingShingle Keisuke Nakamura
Yuya Nagasawa
Shoji Sawaki
Yoshihiko Yokokawa
Comparison of original and alternative incremental sit-to-stand exercise protocol for anaerobic threshold assessment
Journal of Physical Fitness and Sports Medicine
shortened incremental sit-to-stand test
anaerobic threshold
fitness assessment
title Comparison of original and alternative incremental sit-to-stand exercise protocol for anaerobic threshold assessment
title_full Comparison of original and alternative incremental sit-to-stand exercise protocol for anaerobic threshold assessment
title_fullStr Comparison of original and alternative incremental sit-to-stand exercise protocol for anaerobic threshold assessment
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of original and alternative incremental sit-to-stand exercise protocol for anaerobic threshold assessment
title_short Comparison of original and alternative incremental sit-to-stand exercise protocol for anaerobic threshold assessment
title_sort comparison of original and alternative incremental sit to stand exercise protocol for anaerobic threshold assessment
topic shortened incremental sit-to-stand test
anaerobic threshold
fitness assessment
url https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jpfsm/9/2/9_83/_pdf/-char/en
work_keys_str_mv AT keisukenakamura comparisonoforiginalandalternativeincrementalsittostandexerciseprotocolforanaerobicthresholdassessment
AT yuyanagasawa comparisonoforiginalandalternativeincrementalsittostandexerciseprotocolforanaerobicthresholdassessment
AT shojisawaki comparisonoforiginalandalternativeincrementalsittostandexerciseprotocolforanaerobicthresholdassessment
AT yoshihikoyokokawa comparisonoforiginalandalternativeincrementalsittostandexerciseprotocolforanaerobicthresholdassessment