Electrical neurostimulation in glaucoma with progressive vision loss
Abstract Background The retrospective study provides real-world evidence for long-term clinical efficacy of electrical optic nerve stimulation (ONS) in glaucoma with progressive vision loss. Methods Seventy glaucoma patients (45 to 86 y) with progressive vision loss despite therapeutic reduction of...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2022-03-01
|
Series: | Bioelectronic Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s42234-022-00089-9 |
_version_ | 1819025977407176704 |
---|---|
author | Carl Erb Sophie Eckert Pia Gindorf Martin Köhler Thomas Köhler Lukas Neuhann Thomas Neuhann Nadja Salzmann Stefanie Schmickler Jens Ellrich |
author_facet | Carl Erb Sophie Eckert Pia Gindorf Martin Köhler Thomas Köhler Lukas Neuhann Thomas Neuhann Nadja Salzmann Stefanie Schmickler Jens Ellrich |
author_sort | Carl Erb |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background The retrospective study provides real-world evidence for long-term clinical efficacy of electrical optic nerve stimulation (ONS) in glaucoma with progressive vision loss. Methods Seventy glaucoma patients (45 to 86 y) with progressive vision loss despite therapeutic reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) underwent electrical ONS. Closed eyes were separately stimulated by bipolar rectangular pulses with stimulus intensities up to 1.2 mA sufficient to provoke phosphenes. Ten daily stimulation sessions within 2 weeks lasted about 80 min each. Right before ONS at baseline (PRE), vision loss was documented by static threshold perimetry and compared to the same assessment approximately 1 year afterwards (POST). Mean defect (MD) was defined as primary outcome parameter. Perimetries with a reliability factor (RF) of max. 20% were considered. Results Perimetry follow-up of 101 eyes in 70 patients fulfilled the criterion of a max. 20% RF. Follow-up was performed on average 362.2 days after ONS. MD significantly decreased from PRE 14.0 dB (median) to POST 13.4 dB (p < 0.01). 64 eyes in 49 patients showed constant or reduced MD as compared to baseline (PRE 13.4 dB vs. POST 11.2 dB). In 37 eyes of 30 patients, MD increased from PRE 14.9 dB to POST 15.6 dB. Conclusions Innovative treatments that preserve visual function through mechanisms other than lowering IOP are required for glaucoma with progressive vision loss. The present long-term data document progression halt in more than 63% of affected eyes after ONS and, thus, extend existing evidence from clinical trials. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-21T05:19:15Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-69e163a67e7547eda461137d1912d51d |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2332-8886 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-21T05:19:15Z |
publishDate | 2022-03-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | Bioelectronic Medicine |
spelling | doaj.art-69e163a67e7547eda461137d1912d51d2022-12-21T19:14:51ZengBMCBioelectronic Medicine2332-88862022-03-018111110.1186/s42234-022-00089-9Electrical neurostimulation in glaucoma with progressive vision lossCarl Erb0Sophie Eckert1Pia Gindorf2Martin Köhler3Thomas Köhler4Lukas Neuhann5Thomas Neuhann6Nadja Salzmann7Stefanie Schmickler8Jens Ellrich9Augenklinik WittenbergplatzMedizentrum EckertAugenklinik WittenbergplatzGemeinschaftspraxis Salzmann/KöhlerGemeinschaftspraxis Salzmann/KöhlerMVZ Prof. Neuhann GmbHMVZ Prof. Neuhann GmbHGemeinschaftspraxis Salzmann/KöhlerAugen-Zentrum-NordwestMedical Faculty, Friedrich-Alexander-UniversityAbstract Background The retrospective study provides real-world evidence for long-term clinical efficacy of electrical optic nerve stimulation (ONS) in glaucoma with progressive vision loss. Methods Seventy glaucoma patients (45 to 86 y) with progressive vision loss despite therapeutic reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) underwent electrical ONS. Closed eyes were separately stimulated by bipolar rectangular pulses with stimulus intensities up to 1.2 mA sufficient to provoke phosphenes. Ten daily stimulation sessions within 2 weeks lasted about 80 min each. Right before ONS at baseline (PRE), vision loss was documented by static threshold perimetry and compared to the same assessment approximately 1 year afterwards (POST). Mean defect (MD) was defined as primary outcome parameter. Perimetries with a reliability factor (RF) of max. 20% were considered. Results Perimetry follow-up of 101 eyes in 70 patients fulfilled the criterion of a max. 20% RF. Follow-up was performed on average 362.2 days after ONS. MD significantly decreased from PRE 14.0 dB (median) to POST 13.4 dB (p < 0.01). 64 eyes in 49 patients showed constant or reduced MD as compared to baseline (PRE 13.4 dB vs. POST 11.2 dB). In 37 eyes of 30 patients, MD increased from PRE 14.9 dB to POST 15.6 dB. Conclusions Innovative treatments that preserve visual function through mechanisms other than lowering IOP are required for glaucoma with progressive vision loss. The present long-term data document progression halt in more than 63% of affected eyes after ONS and, thus, extend existing evidence from clinical trials.https://doi.org/10.1186/s42234-022-00089-9NeuromodulationNeuroprotectionOptic nervePerimetryRestoration |
spellingShingle | Carl Erb Sophie Eckert Pia Gindorf Martin Köhler Thomas Köhler Lukas Neuhann Thomas Neuhann Nadja Salzmann Stefanie Schmickler Jens Ellrich Electrical neurostimulation in glaucoma with progressive vision loss Bioelectronic Medicine Neuromodulation Neuroprotection Optic nerve Perimetry Restoration |
title | Electrical neurostimulation in glaucoma with progressive vision loss |
title_full | Electrical neurostimulation in glaucoma with progressive vision loss |
title_fullStr | Electrical neurostimulation in glaucoma with progressive vision loss |
title_full_unstemmed | Electrical neurostimulation in glaucoma with progressive vision loss |
title_short | Electrical neurostimulation in glaucoma with progressive vision loss |
title_sort | electrical neurostimulation in glaucoma with progressive vision loss |
topic | Neuromodulation Neuroprotection Optic nerve Perimetry Restoration |
url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s42234-022-00089-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carlerb electricalneurostimulationinglaucomawithprogressivevisionloss AT sophieeckert electricalneurostimulationinglaucomawithprogressivevisionloss AT piagindorf electricalneurostimulationinglaucomawithprogressivevisionloss AT martinkohler electricalneurostimulationinglaucomawithprogressivevisionloss AT thomaskohler electricalneurostimulationinglaucomawithprogressivevisionloss AT lukasneuhann electricalneurostimulationinglaucomawithprogressivevisionloss AT thomasneuhann electricalneurostimulationinglaucomawithprogressivevisionloss AT nadjasalzmann electricalneurostimulationinglaucomawithprogressivevisionloss AT stefanieschmickler electricalneurostimulationinglaucomawithprogressivevisionloss AT jensellrich electricalneurostimulationinglaucomawithprogressivevisionloss |