Isotopic niche overlap between sympatric Australian snubfin and humpback dolphins

Abstract Ecological niche theory predicts the coexistence of closely related species is promoted by resource partitioning in space and time. Australian snubfin (Orcaella heinsohni) and humpback (Sousa sahulensis) dolphins live in sympatry throughout most of their range in northern Australian waters....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Guido J. Parra, Zachary Wojtkowiak, Katharina J. Peters, Daniele Cagnazzi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-05-01
Series:Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8937
_version_ 1817986343010041856
author Guido J. Parra
Zachary Wojtkowiak
Katharina J. Peters
Daniele Cagnazzi
author_facet Guido J. Parra
Zachary Wojtkowiak
Katharina J. Peters
Daniele Cagnazzi
author_sort Guido J. Parra
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Ecological niche theory predicts the coexistence of closely related species is promoted by resource partitioning in space and time. Australian snubfin (Orcaella heinsohni) and humpback (Sousa sahulensis) dolphins live in sympatry throughout most of their range in northern Australian waters. We compared stable isotope ratios of carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen (δ15N) in their skin to investigate resource partitioning between these ecologically similar species. Skin samples were collected from live Australian snubfin (n = 31) and humpback dolphins (n = 23) along the east coast of Queensland in 2014–2015. Both species had similar δ13C and δ15N values and high (>50%) isotopic niche space overlap, suggesting that they feed at similar trophic levels, have substantial dietary overlap, and rely on similar basal food resources. Despite similarities, snubfin dolphins were more likely to have a larger δ15N value than humpback dolphins, indicating they may forage on a wider diversity of prey. Humpback dolphins were more likely to have a larger δ13C range suggesting they may forage on a wider range of habitats. Overall, results suggest that subtle differences in habitat use and prey selection are likely the principal resource partitioning mechanisms enabling the coexistence of Australian snubfin and humpback dolphins.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T00:08:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-69e75247a72d46fea93b91e885671c4a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-7758
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T00:08:44Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Ecology and Evolution
spelling doaj.art-69e75247a72d46fea93b91e885671c4a2022-12-22T02:23:26ZengWileyEcology and Evolution2045-77582022-05-01125n/an/a10.1002/ece3.8937Isotopic niche overlap between sympatric Australian snubfin and humpback dolphinsGuido J. Parra0Zachary Wojtkowiak1Katharina J. Peters2Daniele Cagnazzi3Cetacean Ecology, Behavior and Evolution Lab College of Science and Engineering Flinders University Adelaide South Australia AustraliaCetacean Ecology, Behavior and Evolution Lab College of Science and Engineering Flinders University Adelaide South Australia AustraliaEvolutionary Genetics Group Department of Anthropology University of Zurich Zurich SwitzerlandMarine Ecology Research Centre Faculty of Science and Engineering Southern Cross University Lismore New South Wales AustraliaAbstract Ecological niche theory predicts the coexistence of closely related species is promoted by resource partitioning in space and time. Australian snubfin (Orcaella heinsohni) and humpback (Sousa sahulensis) dolphins live in sympatry throughout most of their range in northern Australian waters. We compared stable isotope ratios of carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen (δ15N) in their skin to investigate resource partitioning between these ecologically similar species. Skin samples were collected from live Australian snubfin (n = 31) and humpback dolphins (n = 23) along the east coast of Queensland in 2014–2015. Both species had similar δ13C and δ15N values and high (>50%) isotopic niche space overlap, suggesting that they feed at similar trophic levels, have substantial dietary overlap, and rely on similar basal food resources. Despite similarities, snubfin dolphins were more likely to have a larger δ15N value than humpback dolphins, indicating they may forage on a wider diversity of prey. Humpback dolphins were more likely to have a larger δ13C range suggesting they may forage on a wider range of habitats. Overall, results suggest that subtle differences in habitat use and prey selection are likely the principal resource partitioning mechanisms enabling the coexistence of Australian snubfin and humpback dolphins.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8937cetaceansecological nichefeeding ecologyOrcaella heinsohniresource partitioningSIBER
spellingShingle Guido J. Parra
Zachary Wojtkowiak
Katharina J. Peters
Daniele Cagnazzi
Isotopic niche overlap between sympatric Australian snubfin and humpback dolphins
Ecology and Evolution
cetaceans
ecological niche
feeding ecology
Orcaella heinsohni
resource partitioning
SIBER
title Isotopic niche overlap between sympatric Australian snubfin and humpback dolphins
title_full Isotopic niche overlap between sympatric Australian snubfin and humpback dolphins
title_fullStr Isotopic niche overlap between sympatric Australian snubfin and humpback dolphins
title_full_unstemmed Isotopic niche overlap between sympatric Australian snubfin and humpback dolphins
title_short Isotopic niche overlap between sympatric Australian snubfin and humpback dolphins
title_sort isotopic niche overlap between sympatric australian snubfin and humpback dolphins
topic cetaceans
ecological niche
feeding ecology
Orcaella heinsohni
resource partitioning
SIBER
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8937
work_keys_str_mv AT guidojparra isotopicnicheoverlapbetweensympatricaustraliansnubfinandhumpbackdolphins
AT zacharywojtkowiak isotopicnicheoverlapbetweensympatricaustraliansnubfinandhumpbackdolphins
AT katharinajpeters isotopicnicheoverlapbetweensympatricaustraliansnubfinandhumpbackdolphins
AT danielecagnazzi isotopicnicheoverlapbetweensympatricaustraliansnubfinandhumpbackdolphins