Advancing clinical leadership to improve the implementation of evidence-based practice in surgery: a longitudinal mixed-method study protocol

Abstract Background Clinical leadership is fundamental in facilitating service improvements in healthcare. Few studies have attempted to understand or model the different approaches to leadership which are used when promoting the uptake and implementation of evidence-based interventions. This resear...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amy Grove, Aileen Clarke, Graeme Currie, Andy Metcalfe, Catherine Pope, Kate Seers
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-12-01
Series:Implementation Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-01063-2
_version_ 1818429641240608768
author Amy Grove
Aileen Clarke
Graeme Currie
Andy Metcalfe
Catherine Pope
Kate Seers
author_facet Amy Grove
Aileen Clarke
Graeme Currie
Andy Metcalfe
Catherine Pope
Kate Seers
author_sort Amy Grove
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Clinical leadership is fundamental in facilitating service improvements in healthcare. Few studies have attempted to understand or model the different approaches to leadership which are used when promoting the uptake and implementation of evidence-based interventions. This research aims to uncover and explain how distributed clinical leadership can be developed and improved to enhance the use of evidence in practice. In doing so, this study examines implementation leadership in orthopaedic surgery to explain leadership as a collective endeavour which cannot be separated from the organisational context. Methods A mixed-method study consisting of longitudinal and cross-sectional interviews and an embedded social network analysis will be performed in six NHS hospitals. A social network analysis will be undertaken in each hospital to uncover the organisational networks, the focal leadership actors and information flows in each organisation. This will be followed by a series of repeated semi-structured interviews, conducted over 4 years, with orthopaedic surgeons and their professional networks. These longitudinal interviews will be supplemented by cross-sectional interviews with the national established surgical leaders. All qualitative data will be analysed using a constructivist grounded theory approach and integrated with the quantitative data. The participant narratives will enrich the social network to uncover the leadership configurations which exist, and how different configurations of leadership are functioning in practice to influence implementation processes and outcomes. Discussion The study findings will facilitate understanding about how and why different configurations of leadership develop and under what organisational conditions and circumstances they are able to flourish. The study will guide the development of leadership interventions that are grounded in the data and aimed at advancing leadership for service improvement in orthopaedics. The strength of the study lies in the combination of multi-component, multi-site, multi-agent methods to examine leadership processes in surgery. The findings may be limited by the practical challenges of longitudinal qualitative data collection, such as ensuring participant retention, which need to be balanced against the theoretical and empirical insights generated through this comprehensive exploration of leadership across and within a range of healthcare organisations.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T15:20:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-69ed13c0d7f24aaaac52bd2c582e1750
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1748-5908
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T15:20:45Z
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Implementation Science
spelling doaj.art-69ed13c0d7f24aaaac52bd2c582e17502022-12-21T22:56:10ZengBMCImplementation Science1748-59082020-12-0115111010.1186/s13012-020-01063-2Advancing clinical leadership to improve the implementation of evidence-based practice in surgery: a longitudinal mixed-method study protocolAmy Grove0Aileen Clarke1Graeme Currie2Andy Metcalfe3Catherine Pope4Kate Seers5Health Technology Assessment and Implementation Science, Warwick Medical School, University of WarwickPublic Health and Health Services Research, Warwick Medical School, University of WarwickPublic Management, Warwick Business School, University of WarwickTrauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Warwick Medical School, University of WarwickMedical Sociology, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of OxfordHealth Services Research, Warwick Medical School, University of WarwickAbstract Background Clinical leadership is fundamental in facilitating service improvements in healthcare. Few studies have attempted to understand or model the different approaches to leadership which are used when promoting the uptake and implementation of evidence-based interventions. This research aims to uncover and explain how distributed clinical leadership can be developed and improved to enhance the use of evidence in practice. In doing so, this study examines implementation leadership in orthopaedic surgery to explain leadership as a collective endeavour which cannot be separated from the organisational context. Methods A mixed-method study consisting of longitudinal and cross-sectional interviews and an embedded social network analysis will be performed in six NHS hospitals. A social network analysis will be undertaken in each hospital to uncover the organisational networks, the focal leadership actors and information flows in each organisation. This will be followed by a series of repeated semi-structured interviews, conducted over 4 years, with orthopaedic surgeons and their professional networks. These longitudinal interviews will be supplemented by cross-sectional interviews with the national established surgical leaders. All qualitative data will be analysed using a constructivist grounded theory approach and integrated with the quantitative data. The participant narratives will enrich the social network to uncover the leadership configurations which exist, and how different configurations of leadership are functioning in practice to influence implementation processes and outcomes. Discussion The study findings will facilitate understanding about how and why different configurations of leadership develop and under what organisational conditions and circumstances they are able to flourish. The study will guide the development of leadership interventions that are grounded in the data and aimed at advancing leadership for service improvement in orthopaedics. The strength of the study lies in the combination of multi-component, multi-site, multi-agent methods to examine leadership processes in surgery. The findings may be limited by the practical challenges of longitudinal qualitative data collection, such as ensuring participant retention, which need to be balanced against the theoretical and empirical insights generated through this comprehensive exploration of leadership across and within a range of healthcare organisations.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-01063-2OrthopaedicsLeadershipEvidence-based practiceSocial Network Analysis-Longitudinal InterviewsQualitative
spellingShingle Amy Grove
Aileen Clarke
Graeme Currie
Andy Metcalfe
Catherine Pope
Kate Seers
Advancing clinical leadership to improve the implementation of evidence-based practice in surgery: a longitudinal mixed-method study protocol
Implementation Science
Orthopaedics
Leadership
Evidence-based practice
Social Network Analysis-Longitudinal Interviews
Qualitative
title Advancing clinical leadership to improve the implementation of evidence-based practice in surgery: a longitudinal mixed-method study protocol
title_full Advancing clinical leadership to improve the implementation of evidence-based practice in surgery: a longitudinal mixed-method study protocol
title_fullStr Advancing clinical leadership to improve the implementation of evidence-based practice in surgery: a longitudinal mixed-method study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Advancing clinical leadership to improve the implementation of evidence-based practice in surgery: a longitudinal mixed-method study protocol
title_short Advancing clinical leadership to improve the implementation of evidence-based practice in surgery: a longitudinal mixed-method study protocol
title_sort advancing clinical leadership to improve the implementation of evidence based practice in surgery a longitudinal mixed method study protocol
topic Orthopaedics
Leadership
Evidence-based practice
Social Network Analysis-Longitudinal Interviews
Qualitative
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-01063-2
work_keys_str_mv AT amygrove advancingclinicalleadershiptoimprovetheimplementationofevidencebasedpracticeinsurgeryalongitudinalmixedmethodstudyprotocol
AT aileenclarke advancingclinicalleadershiptoimprovetheimplementationofevidencebasedpracticeinsurgeryalongitudinalmixedmethodstudyprotocol
AT graemecurrie advancingclinicalleadershiptoimprovetheimplementationofevidencebasedpracticeinsurgeryalongitudinalmixedmethodstudyprotocol
AT andymetcalfe advancingclinicalleadershiptoimprovetheimplementationofevidencebasedpracticeinsurgeryalongitudinalmixedmethodstudyprotocol
AT catherinepope advancingclinicalleadershiptoimprovetheimplementationofevidencebasedpracticeinsurgeryalongitudinalmixedmethodstudyprotocol
AT kateseers advancingclinicalleadershiptoimprovetheimplementationofevidencebasedpracticeinsurgeryalongitudinalmixedmethodstudyprotocol