Pulmonary response to intratracheal instillation of ultrafine versus fine titanium dioxide: role of particle surface area

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The production and use of nanoparticles is growing rapidly due to the unique physical and chemical properties associated with their nano size and large surface area. Since nanoparticles have unique physicochemical properties, their b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kommineni C, Sager Tina M, Castranova Vincent
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2008-12-01
Series:Particle and Fibre Toxicology
Online Access:http://www.particleandfibretoxicology.com/content/5/1/17
_version_ 1818029217715060736
author Kommineni C
Sager Tina M
Castranova Vincent
author_facet Kommineni C
Sager Tina M
Castranova Vincent
author_sort Kommineni C
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The production and use of nanoparticles is growing rapidly due to the unique physical and chemical properties associated with their nano size and large surface area. Since nanoparticles have unique physicochemical properties, their bioactivity upon exposure to workers or consumers is of interest. In this study, the issue of what dose metric (mass dose versus surface area dose) is appropriate for toxicological studies has been addressed. Rats were exposed by intratracheal instillation to various doses of ultrafine or fine TiO<sub>2</sub>. At 1, 7, or 42 days post-exposure, inflammatory and cytotoxic potential of each particle type was compared on both a mass dosage (mg/rat) as well as an equal surface area dosage (cm<sup>2 </sup>of particles per cm<sup>2 </sup>of alveolar epithelium) basis.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The findings of the study show that on a mass basis the ultrafine particles caused significantly more inflammation and were significantly more cytotoxic than the fine sized particles. However, when doses were equalized based on surface area of particles delivered, the ultrafine particles were only slightly more inflammogenic and cytotoxic when compared to the fine sized particles. Lung burden data indicate that ultrafine TiO<sub>2 </sub>appears to migrate to the interstitium to a much greater extent than fine TiO<sub>2</sub>.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>This study suggests that surface area of particles may be a more appropriate dose metric for pulmonary toxicity studies than mass of particles.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-10T05:16:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-69f6394ec82645579fa62595a4c580e8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1743-8977
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T05:16:11Z
publishDate 2008-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Particle and Fibre Toxicology
spelling doaj.art-69f6394ec82645579fa62595a4c580e82022-12-22T02:00:57ZengBMCParticle and Fibre Toxicology1743-89772008-12-01511710.1186/1743-8977-5-17Pulmonary response to intratracheal instillation of ultrafine versus fine titanium dioxide: role of particle surface areaKommineni CSager Tina MCastranova Vincent<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The production and use of nanoparticles is growing rapidly due to the unique physical and chemical properties associated with their nano size and large surface area. Since nanoparticles have unique physicochemical properties, their bioactivity upon exposure to workers or consumers is of interest. In this study, the issue of what dose metric (mass dose versus surface area dose) is appropriate for toxicological studies has been addressed. Rats were exposed by intratracheal instillation to various doses of ultrafine or fine TiO<sub>2</sub>. At 1, 7, or 42 days post-exposure, inflammatory and cytotoxic potential of each particle type was compared on both a mass dosage (mg/rat) as well as an equal surface area dosage (cm<sup>2 </sup>of particles per cm<sup>2 </sup>of alveolar epithelium) basis.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The findings of the study show that on a mass basis the ultrafine particles caused significantly more inflammation and were significantly more cytotoxic than the fine sized particles. However, when doses were equalized based on surface area of particles delivered, the ultrafine particles were only slightly more inflammogenic and cytotoxic when compared to the fine sized particles. Lung burden data indicate that ultrafine TiO<sub>2 </sub>appears to migrate to the interstitium to a much greater extent than fine TiO<sub>2</sub>.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>This study suggests that surface area of particles may be a more appropriate dose metric for pulmonary toxicity studies than mass of particles.</p>http://www.particleandfibretoxicology.com/content/5/1/17
spellingShingle Kommineni C
Sager Tina M
Castranova Vincent
Pulmonary response to intratracheal instillation of ultrafine versus fine titanium dioxide: role of particle surface area
Particle and Fibre Toxicology
title Pulmonary response to intratracheal instillation of ultrafine versus fine titanium dioxide: role of particle surface area
title_full Pulmonary response to intratracheal instillation of ultrafine versus fine titanium dioxide: role of particle surface area
title_fullStr Pulmonary response to intratracheal instillation of ultrafine versus fine titanium dioxide: role of particle surface area
title_full_unstemmed Pulmonary response to intratracheal instillation of ultrafine versus fine titanium dioxide: role of particle surface area
title_short Pulmonary response to intratracheal instillation of ultrafine versus fine titanium dioxide: role of particle surface area
title_sort pulmonary response to intratracheal instillation of ultrafine versus fine titanium dioxide role of particle surface area
url http://www.particleandfibretoxicology.com/content/5/1/17
work_keys_str_mv AT komminenic pulmonaryresponsetointratrachealinstillationofultrafineversusfinetitaniumdioxideroleofparticlesurfacearea
AT sagertinam pulmonaryresponsetointratrachealinstillationofultrafineversusfinetitaniumdioxideroleofparticlesurfacearea
AT castranovavincent pulmonaryresponsetointratrachealinstillationofultrafineversusfinetitaniumdioxideroleofparticlesurfacearea