A review of Chinese ethnology in the past hundred years and its summary in the new era
Abstract Ethnology has been introduced into China in the early twentieth century. Its hundred-year evolution can be divided into three phases: ethnology in the “Old China”; ethnology in the “New China”, and ethnology in the “New Era” (1978–2008). In the phase of “Old China”, relying on introducing t...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SpringerOpen
2017-12-01
|
| Series: | International Journal of Anthropology and Ethnology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41257-017-0002-y |
| _version_ | 1818514723662987264 |
|---|---|
| author | Shengmin Yang |
| author_facet | Shengmin Yang |
| author_sort | Shengmin Yang |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Ethnology has been introduced into China in the early twentieth century. Its hundred-year evolution can be divided into three phases: ethnology in the “Old China”; ethnology in the “New China”, and ethnology in the “New Era” (1978–2008). In the phase of “Old China”, relying on introducing the western approaches both in theory and methodology, the Chinese ethnological community offered courses of ethnology and anthropology in dozens of universities. In the 1950s, the early years of “New China”, Chinese ethnology became a branch of the Soviet school and made great contributions to ethnic identification, as well as studies on the society and history of ethnic minorities, providing the basis and reference for the “New China” government to formulate ethnic policies. During the “New Period”, after 30 years of isolation from the outside world, Chinese ethnology entered again into Western academia and became a member of the international ethnological society. Now, Chinese ethnology has been constructed as an open academic domain and lifted out of the stereotype based on a certain school or ideology. Moreover, it has established its own school with localized characteristic, that is, a historically functional school directed by Marxism. Before the “New Period”, ethnology was revoked due to its characteristic as a “bourgeois” and “revisionist” discipline, but Chinese ethnology has embarked on a most fruitful period of rapid growth since 1978. The past three decades also can be divided into three periods: a decade of restoration and reconstruction in the 1980s, a decade of early development and expansion of research scope in the 1990s, and the decade of golden development after the year 2000. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-11T00:19:43Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-6a000aca61134d71b03748d1f0223650 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2366-1003 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-11T00:19:43Z |
| publishDate | 2017-12-01 |
| publisher | SpringerOpen |
| record_format | Article |
| series | International Journal of Anthropology and Ethnology |
| spelling | doaj.art-6a000aca61134d71b03748d1f02236502022-12-22T01:27:48ZengSpringerOpenInternational Journal of Anthropology and Ethnology2366-10032017-12-011112810.1186/s41257-017-0002-yA review of Chinese ethnology in the past hundred years and its summary in the new eraShengmin Yang0Minzu University of ChinaAbstract Ethnology has been introduced into China in the early twentieth century. Its hundred-year evolution can be divided into three phases: ethnology in the “Old China”; ethnology in the “New China”, and ethnology in the “New Era” (1978–2008). In the phase of “Old China”, relying on introducing the western approaches both in theory and methodology, the Chinese ethnological community offered courses of ethnology and anthropology in dozens of universities. In the 1950s, the early years of “New China”, Chinese ethnology became a branch of the Soviet school and made great contributions to ethnic identification, as well as studies on the society and history of ethnic minorities, providing the basis and reference for the “New China” government to formulate ethnic policies. During the “New Period”, after 30 years of isolation from the outside world, Chinese ethnology entered again into Western academia and became a member of the international ethnological society. Now, Chinese ethnology has been constructed as an open academic domain and lifted out of the stereotype based on a certain school or ideology. Moreover, it has established its own school with localized characteristic, that is, a historically functional school directed by Marxism. Before the “New Period”, ethnology was revoked due to its characteristic as a “bourgeois” and “revisionist” discipline, but Chinese ethnology has embarked on a most fruitful period of rapid growth since 1978. The past three decades also can be divided into three periods: a decade of restoration and reconstruction in the 1980s, a decade of early development and expansion of research scope in the 1990s, and the decade of golden development after the year 2000.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41257-017-0002-yEthnologyAnthropologyReconstruction |
| spellingShingle | Shengmin Yang A review of Chinese ethnology in the past hundred years and its summary in the new era International Journal of Anthropology and Ethnology Ethnology Anthropology Reconstruction |
| title | A review of Chinese ethnology in the past hundred years and its summary in the new era |
| title_full | A review of Chinese ethnology in the past hundred years and its summary in the new era |
| title_fullStr | A review of Chinese ethnology in the past hundred years and its summary in the new era |
| title_full_unstemmed | A review of Chinese ethnology in the past hundred years and its summary in the new era |
| title_short | A review of Chinese ethnology in the past hundred years and its summary in the new era |
| title_sort | review of chinese ethnology in the past hundred years and its summary in the new era |
| topic | Ethnology Anthropology Reconstruction |
| url | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41257-017-0002-y |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT shengminyang areviewofchineseethnologyinthepasthundredyearsanditssummaryinthenewera AT shengminyang reviewofchineseethnologyinthepasthundredyearsanditssummaryinthenewera |