Characteristics of joint physical custody families in Flanders

BACKGROUND Research conducted in the 1990s showed that children who live alternately with their mother and father after divorce (joint physical custody) have closer relationships with both parents and better emotional outcomes. In 1995 and 2006, joint legal custody and joint physical custody became...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: An Katrien Sodermans, Koen Matthijs, Gray Swicegood
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research 2013-04-01
Series:Demographic Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol28/29/
_version_ 1819036373349302272
author An Katrien Sodermans
Koen Matthijs
Gray Swicegood
author_facet An Katrien Sodermans
Koen Matthijs
Gray Swicegood
author_sort An Katrien Sodermans
collection DOAJ
description BACKGROUND Research conducted in the 1990s showed that children who live alternately with their mother and father after divorce (joint physical custody) have closer relationships with both parents and better emotional outcomes. In 1995 and 2006, joint legal custody and joint physical custody became the default judicial recommendations in Belgium. These defaults served to increase the incidence of joint custody arrangements. However, parents with joint physical custody arrangements who divorced before 2006 may have had higher socio-economic standing and lower conflict relationships than couples that divorced afterwards. Thus earlier research on the impact of joint physical custody arrangements on child outcomes may be too optimistic when considering children of recently divorced parents. OBJECTIVE This study examines the characteristics of four different physical custody arrangements (sole mother, sole father, joint physical, and flexible custody) in Flanders, Belgium, and whether these characteristics have changed over time. The legal changes in 1995 and 2006 are used to distinguish three divorce cohorts. METHODS We use data on 2,207 couples that legally divorced between 1971 and 2010 from the Divorce in Flanders project, a large-scale representative multi-actor survey. Multinomial logistic regression models provide estimates of the likelihoods of different physical custody arrangements. RESULTS The incidence of sole mother custody has decreased over the last decades and children increasingly alternate between the households of the mother and the father after divorce. The incidence of sole father custody has remained low. Higher educated parents are more likely to have joint physical custody arrangements than parents from lower social classes. Also, within couples, relative educational levels are important because the higher educated spouse is more likely to have physical custody of the child. We also find that the associations between socio-demographic variables and custody outcomes have changed over time. Prior to the legal changes low-conflict couples were overrepresented in joint physical custody arrangements, but this pattern has now disappeared. CONCLUSIONS Flanders has clearly followed the road towards more gender-neutral parenting. Hand in hand with changing legislation, joint physical custody has become more prevalent, and the socio-demographic profile of joint-custody families has become more heterogeneous. The increased likelihood that higher-conflict couples enter joint physical custody arrangements may have important consequences for the children involved.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T08:04:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6a0196b2fdfd4f55bcad6dbc326d8dc2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1435-9871
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T08:04:29Z
publishDate 2013-04-01
publisher Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research
record_format Article
series Demographic Research
spelling doaj.art-6a0196b2fdfd4f55bcad6dbc326d8dc22022-12-21T19:10:50ZengMax Planck Institute for Demographic ResearchDemographic Research1435-98712013-04-012829Characteristics of joint physical custody families in FlandersAn Katrien SodermansKoen MatthijsGray SwicegoodBACKGROUND Research conducted in the 1990s showed that children who live alternately with their mother and father after divorce (joint physical custody) have closer relationships with both parents and better emotional outcomes. In 1995 and 2006, joint legal custody and joint physical custody became the default judicial recommendations in Belgium. These defaults served to increase the incidence of joint custody arrangements. However, parents with joint physical custody arrangements who divorced before 2006 may have had higher socio-economic standing and lower conflict relationships than couples that divorced afterwards. Thus earlier research on the impact of joint physical custody arrangements on child outcomes may be too optimistic when considering children of recently divorced parents. OBJECTIVE This study examines the characteristics of four different physical custody arrangements (sole mother, sole father, joint physical, and flexible custody) in Flanders, Belgium, and whether these characteristics have changed over time. The legal changes in 1995 and 2006 are used to distinguish three divorce cohorts. METHODS We use data on 2,207 couples that legally divorced between 1971 and 2010 from the Divorce in Flanders project, a large-scale representative multi-actor survey. Multinomial logistic regression models provide estimates of the likelihoods of different physical custody arrangements. RESULTS The incidence of sole mother custody has decreased over the last decades and children increasingly alternate between the households of the mother and the father after divorce. The incidence of sole father custody has remained low. Higher educated parents are more likely to have joint physical custody arrangements than parents from lower social classes. Also, within couples, relative educational levels are important because the higher educated spouse is more likely to have physical custody of the child. We also find that the associations between socio-demographic variables and custody outcomes have changed over time. Prior to the legal changes low-conflict couples were overrepresented in joint physical custody arrangements, but this pattern has now disappeared. CONCLUSIONS Flanders has clearly followed the road towards more gender-neutral parenting. Hand in hand with changing legislation, joint physical custody has become more prevalent, and the socio-demographic profile of joint-custody families has become more heterogeneous. The increased likelihood that higher-conflict couples enter joint physical custody arrangements may have important consequences for the children involved.http://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol28/29/custody legislationeducational levelfather sole custodyjoint custodyparental conflict
spellingShingle An Katrien Sodermans
Koen Matthijs
Gray Swicegood
Characteristics of joint physical custody families in Flanders
Demographic Research
custody legislation
educational level
father sole custody
joint custody
parental conflict
title Characteristics of joint physical custody families in Flanders
title_full Characteristics of joint physical custody families in Flanders
title_fullStr Characteristics of joint physical custody families in Flanders
title_full_unstemmed Characteristics of joint physical custody families in Flanders
title_short Characteristics of joint physical custody families in Flanders
title_sort characteristics of joint physical custody families in flanders
topic custody legislation
educational level
father sole custody
joint custody
parental conflict
url http://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol28/29/
work_keys_str_mv AT ankatriensodermans characteristicsofjointphysicalcustodyfamiliesinflanders
AT koenmatthijs characteristicsofjointphysicalcustodyfamiliesinflanders
AT grayswicegood characteristicsofjointphysicalcustodyfamiliesinflanders