Validity of the frame subtraction method in dynamic postural stability
Abstract Background The movement of targeted subjects can be calculated using the frame subtraction method. However, the validity of this evaluation method of dynamic postural stability has not been clarified yet. This study aimed to verify the validity of the evaluation method for jump landing usin...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2022-09-01
|
Series: | BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-022-00570-7 |
_version_ | 1811253683094028288 |
---|---|
author | Megumi Ota Hiroshige Tateuchi Takaya Hashiguchi Karen Fujiwara Ayano Sasaki Kiseki Okumura Noriaki Ichihashi |
author_facet | Megumi Ota Hiroshige Tateuchi Takaya Hashiguchi Karen Fujiwara Ayano Sasaki Kiseki Okumura Noriaki Ichihashi |
author_sort | Megumi Ota |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background The movement of targeted subjects can be calculated using the frame subtraction method. However, the validity of this evaluation method of dynamic postural stability has not been clarified yet. This study aimed to verify the validity of the evaluation method for jump landing using the frame subtraction score based on the ground reaction force (GRF). Methods Twenty subjects performed single-leg jump landing, and their dynamic postural stability index (DPSI), medial‒lateral stability index (MLSI), anterior‒posterior stability index, and vertical stability index (VSI) were calculated from the GRF. Simultaneously, motion images were captured using digital video cameras in the sagittal and frontal planes. After the motion images were analyzed using the frame subtraction method, the frame subtraction scores in the frontal, sagittal, and combined planes were calculated. To confirm its validity, the relationship between the frame subtraction scores and GRF parameters was investigated using Pearson's correlation analysis. Results The frame subtraction scores in the frontal and combined planes were significantly correlated with the DPSI, MLSI, and VSI (r = 0.46–0.75, P < 0.05). Conclusions Therefore, the frame subtraction method could be applied to the evaluation of dynamic postural stability. Markerless systems are deemed useful in clinical practice. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-12T16:54:39Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-6a24a3cdbb8749eabe163cb5fbdc94df |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2052-1847 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-12T16:54:39Z |
publishDate | 2022-09-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation |
spelling | doaj.art-6a24a3cdbb8749eabe163cb5fbdc94df2022-12-22T03:24:16ZengBMCBMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation2052-18472022-09-011411810.1186/s13102-022-00570-7Validity of the frame subtraction method in dynamic postural stabilityMegumi Ota0Hiroshige Tateuchi1Takaya Hashiguchi2Karen Fujiwara3Ayano Sasaki4Kiseki Okumura5Noriaki Ichihashi6Department of Preventive Physical Therapy, Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto UniversityDepartment of Physical Therapy, Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto UniversityMixi Incorporated, Shibuya Scramble Square 36FKansai Medical University HospitalDepartment of Physical Therapy, Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto UniversityDepartment of Physical Therapy, Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto UniversityDepartment of Physical Therapy, Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto UniversityAbstract Background The movement of targeted subjects can be calculated using the frame subtraction method. However, the validity of this evaluation method of dynamic postural stability has not been clarified yet. This study aimed to verify the validity of the evaluation method for jump landing using the frame subtraction score based on the ground reaction force (GRF). Methods Twenty subjects performed single-leg jump landing, and their dynamic postural stability index (DPSI), medial‒lateral stability index (MLSI), anterior‒posterior stability index, and vertical stability index (VSI) were calculated from the GRF. Simultaneously, motion images were captured using digital video cameras in the sagittal and frontal planes. After the motion images were analyzed using the frame subtraction method, the frame subtraction scores in the frontal, sagittal, and combined planes were calculated. To confirm its validity, the relationship between the frame subtraction scores and GRF parameters was investigated using Pearson's correlation analysis. Results The frame subtraction scores in the frontal and combined planes were significantly correlated with the DPSI, MLSI, and VSI (r = 0.46–0.75, P < 0.05). Conclusions Therefore, the frame subtraction method could be applied to the evaluation of dynamic postural stability. Markerless systems are deemed useful in clinical practice.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-022-00570-7Frame subtraction methodMotion analysisMarkerless systemDynamic balancePostural stability |
spellingShingle | Megumi Ota Hiroshige Tateuchi Takaya Hashiguchi Karen Fujiwara Ayano Sasaki Kiseki Okumura Noriaki Ichihashi Validity of the frame subtraction method in dynamic postural stability BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation Frame subtraction method Motion analysis Markerless system Dynamic balance Postural stability |
title | Validity of the frame subtraction method in dynamic postural stability |
title_full | Validity of the frame subtraction method in dynamic postural stability |
title_fullStr | Validity of the frame subtraction method in dynamic postural stability |
title_full_unstemmed | Validity of the frame subtraction method in dynamic postural stability |
title_short | Validity of the frame subtraction method in dynamic postural stability |
title_sort | validity of the frame subtraction method in dynamic postural stability |
topic | Frame subtraction method Motion analysis Markerless system Dynamic balance Postural stability |
url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-022-00570-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT megumiota validityoftheframesubtractionmethodindynamicposturalstability AT hiroshigetateuchi validityoftheframesubtractionmethodindynamicposturalstability AT takayahashiguchi validityoftheframesubtractionmethodindynamicposturalstability AT karenfujiwara validityoftheframesubtractionmethodindynamicposturalstability AT ayanosasaki validityoftheframesubtractionmethodindynamicposturalstability AT kisekiokumura validityoftheframesubtractionmethodindynamicposturalstability AT noriakiichihashi validityoftheframesubtractionmethodindynamicposturalstability |