Validity of the frame subtraction method in dynamic postural stability

Abstract Background The movement of targeted subjects can be calculated using the frame subtraction method. However, the validity of this evaluation method of dynamic postural stability has not been clarified yet. This study aimed to verify the validity of the evaluation method for jump landing usin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Megumi Ota, Hiroshige Tateuchi, Takaya Hashiguchi, Karen Fujiwara, Ayano Sasaki, Kiseki Okumura, Noriaki Ichihashi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-09-01
Series:BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-022-00570-7
_version_ 1811253683094028288
author Megumi Ota
Hiroshige Tateuchi
Takaya Hashiguchi
Karen Fujiwara
Ayano Sasaki
Kiseki Okumura
Noriaki Ichihashi
author_facet Megumi Ota
Hiroshige Tateuchi
Takaya Hashiguchi
Karen Fujiwara
Ayano Sasaki
Kiseki Okumura
Noriaki Ichihashi
author_sort Megumi Ota
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The movement of targeted subjects can be calculated using the frame subtraction method. However, the validity of this evaluation method of dynamic postural stability has not been clarified yet. This study aimed to verify the validity of the evaluation method for jump landing using the frame subtraction score based on the ground reaction force (GRF). Methods Twenty subjects performed single-leg jump landing, and their dynamic postural stability index (DPSI), medial‒lateral stability index (MLSI), anterior‒posterior stability index, and vertical stability index (VSI) were calculated from the GRF. Simultaneously, motion images were captured using digital video cameras in the sagittal and frontal planes. After the motion images were analyzed using the frame subtraction method, the frame subtraction scores in the frontal, sagittal, and combined planes were calculated. To confirm its validity, the relationship between the frame subtraction scores and GRF parameters was investigated using Pearson's correlation analysis. Results The frame subtraction scores in the frontal and combined planes were significantly correlated with the DPSI, MLSI, and VSI (r = 0.46–0.75, P < 0.05). Conclusions Therefore, the frame subtraction method could be applied to the evaluation of dynamic postural stability. Markerless systems are deemed useful in clinical practice.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T16:54:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6a24a3cdbb8749eabe163cb5fbdc94df
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2052-1847
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T16:54:39Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
spelling doaj.art-6a24a3cdbb8749eabe163cb5fbdc94df2022-12-22T03:24:16ZengBMCBMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation2052-18472022-09-011411810.1186/s13102-022-00570-7Validity of the frame subtraction method in dynamic postural stabilityMegumi Ota0Hiroshige Tateuchi1Takaya Hashiguchi2Karen Fujiwara3Ayano Sasaki4Kiseki Okumura5Noriaki Ichihashi6Department of Preventive Physical Therapy, Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto UniversityDepartment of Physical Therapy, Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto UniversityMixi Incorporated, Shibuya Scramble Square 36FKansai Medical University HospitalDepartment of Physical Therapy, Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto UniversityDepartment of Physical Therapy, Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto UniversityDepartment of Physical Therapy, Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto UniversityAbstract Background The movement of targeted subjects can be calculated using the frame subtraction method. However, the validity of this evaluation method of dynamic postural stability has not been clarified yet. This study aimed to verify the validity of the evaluation method for jump landing using the frame subtraction score based on the ground reaction force (GRF). Methods Twenty subjects performed single-leg jump landing, and their dynamic postural stability index (DPSI), medial‒lateral stability index (MLSI), anterior‒posterior stability index, and vertical stability index (VSI) were calculated from the GRF. Simultaneously, motion images were captured using digital video cameras in the sagittal and frontal planes. After the motion images were analyzed using the frame subtraction method, the frame subtraction scores in the frontal, sagittal, and combined planes were calculated. To confirm its validity, the relationship between the frame subtraction scores and GRF parameters was investigated using Pearson's correlation analysis. Results The frame subtraction scores in the frontal and combined planes were significantly correlated with the DPSI, MLSI, and VSI (r = 0.46–0.75, P < 0.05). Conclusions Therefore, the frame subtraction method could be applied to the evaluation of dynamic postural stability. Markerless systems are deemed useful in clinical practice.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-022-00570-7Frame subtraction methodMotion analysisMarkerless systemDynamic balancePostural stability
spellingShingle Megumi Ota
Hiroshige Tateuchi
Takaya Hashiguchi
Karen Fujiwara
Ayano Sasaki
Kiseki Okumura
Noriaki Ichihashi
Validity of the frame subtraction method in dynamic postural stability
BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
Frame subtraction method
Motion analysis
Markerless system
Dynamic balance
Postural stability
title Validity of the frame subtraction method in dynamic postural stability
title_full Validity of the frame subtraction method in dynamic postural stability
title_fullStr Validity of the frame subtraction method in dynamic postural stability
title_full_unstemmed Validity of the frame subtraction method in dynamic postural stability
title_short Validity of the frame subtraction method in dynamic postural stability
title_sort validity of the frame subtraction method in dynamic postural stability
topic Frame subtraction method
Motion analysis
Markerless system
Dynamic balance
Postural stability
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-022-00570-7
work_keys_str_mv AT megumiota validityoftheframesubtractionmethodindynamicposturalstability
AT hiroshigetateuchi validityoftheframesubtractionmethodindynamicposturalstability
AT takayahashiguchi validityoftheframesubtractionmethodindynamicposturalstability
AT karenfujiwara validityoftheframesubtractionmethodindynamicposturalstability
AT ayanosasaki validityoftheframesubtractionmethodindynamicposturalstability
AT kisekiokumura validityoftheframesubtractionmethodindynamicposturalstability
AT noriakiichihashi validityoftheframesubtractionmethodindynamicposturalstability