338 Diffusion Basis Spectrum Imaging (DBSI) Prognosticates Outcomes for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy after Surgery
OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Diffusion basis spectrum imaging (DBSI) allows for detailed evaluation of white matter microstructural changes present in cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Our goal is to utilize multidimensional clinical and quantitative imaging data to characterize disease severity and predi...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2022-04-01
|
Series: | Journal of Clinical and Translational Science |
Online Access: | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866122001911/type/journal_article |
_version_ | 1811155222389587968 |
---|---|
author | Justin Zhang Saad Javeed Jacob K. Greenberg Dinal Jayasekera Christopher F. Dibble Jacob Blum Rachel Jakes Peng Sun Sheng-Kwei Song Wilson Z. Ray |
author_facet | Justin Zhang Saad Javeed Jacob K. Greenberg Dinal Jayasekera Christopher F. Dibble Jacob Blum Rachel Jakes Peng Sun Sheng-Kwei Song Wilson Z. Ray |
author_sort | Justin Zhang |
collection | DOAJ |
description | OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Diffusion basis spectrum imaging (DBSI) allows for detailed evaluation of white matter microstructural changes present in cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Our goal is to utilize multidimensional clinical and quantitative imaging data to characterize disease severity and predict long-term outcomes in CSM patients undergoing surgery. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: A single-center prospective cohort study enrolled fifty CSM patients who underwent surgical decompression and twenty healthy controls from 2018-2021. All patients underwent diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), DBSI, and complete clinical evaluations at baseline and 2-years follow-up. Primary outcome measures were the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score (mild [mJOA 15-17], moderate [mJOA 12-14], severe [mJOA 0-11]) and SF-36 Physical and Mental Component Summaries (PCS and MCS). At 2-years follow-up, improvement was assessed via established MCID thresholds. A supervised machine learning classification model was used to predict treatment outcomes. The highest-performing algorithm was a linear support vector machine. Leave-one-out cross-validation was utilized to test model performance. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: A total of 70 patients – 20 controls, 25 mild, and 25 moderate/severe CSM patients – were enrolled. Baseline clinical and DTI/DBSI measures were significantly different between groups. DBSI Axial and Radial Diffusivity were significantly correlated with baseline mJOA and mJOA recovery, respectively (r=-0.33, p<0.01; r=-0.36, p=0.02). When predicting baseline disease severity (mJOA classification), DTI metrics alone performed with 38.7% accuracy (AUC: 72.2), compared to 95.2% accuracy (AUC: 98.9) with DBSI metrics alone. When predicting improvement after surgery (change in mJOA), clinical variables alone performed with 33.3% accuracy (AUC: 0.40). When combining DTI or DBSI parameters with key clinical covariates, model accuracy improved to 66.7% (AUC: 0.65) and 88.1% (AUC: 0.95) accuracy, respectively. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: DBSI metrics correlate with baseline disease severity and outcome measures at 2-years follow-up. Our results suggest that DBSI may serve as a valid non-invasive imaging biomarker for CSM disease severity and potential for postoperative improvement. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-10T04:30:33Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-6a27975198c747ca9aba75ed2ab0be65 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2059-8661 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-10T04:30:33Z |
publishDate | 2022-04-01 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Clinical and Translational Science |
spelling | doaj.art-6a27975198c747ca9aba75ed2ab0be652023-03-10T07:53:49ZengCambridge University PressJournal of Clinical and Translational Science2059-86612022-04-016626210.1017/cts.2022.191338 Diffusion Basis Spectrum Imaging (DBSI) Prognosticates Outcomes for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy after SurgeryJustin Zhang0Saad Javeed1Jacob K. Greenberg2Dinal Jayasekera3Christopher F. Dibble4Jacob Blum5Rachel Jakes6Peng Sun7Sheng-Kwei Song8Wilson Z. Ray9Washington University School of MedicineWashington University School of MedicineWashington University School of MedicineWashington University School of MedicineWashington University School of MedicineWashington University School of MedicineWashington University School of MedicineWashington University School of MedicineWashington University School of MedicineWashington University School of MedicineOBJECTIVES/GOALS: Diffusion basis spectrum imaging (DBSI) allows for detailed evaluation of white matter microstructural changes present in cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Our goal is to utilize multidimensional clinical and quantitative imaging data to characterize disease severity and predict long-term outcomes in CSM patients undergoing surgery. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: A single-center prospective cohort study enrolled fifty CSM patients who underwent surgical decompression and twenty healthy controls from 2018-2021. All patients underwent diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), DBSI, and complete clinical evaluations at baseline and 2-years follow-up. Primary outcome measures were the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score (mild [mJOA 15-17], moderate [mJOA 12-14], severe [mJOA 0-11]) and SF-36 Physical and Mental Component Summaries (PCS and MCS). At 2-years follow-up, improvement was assessed via established MCID thresholds. A supervised machine learning classification model was used to predict treatment outcomes. The highest-performing algorithm was a linear support vector machine. Leave-one-out cross-validation was utilized to test model performance. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: A total of 70 patients – 20 controls, 25 mild, and 25 moderate/severe CSM patients – were enrolled. Baseline clinical and DTI/DBSI measures were significantly different between groups. DBSI Axial and Radial Diffusivity were significantly correlated with baseline mJOA and mJOA recovery, respectively (r=-0.33, p<0.01; r=-0.36, p=0.02). When predicting baseline disease severity (mJOA classification), DTI metrics alone performed with 38.7% accuracy (AUC: 72.2), compared to 95.2% accuracy (AUC: 98.9) with DBSI metrics alone. When predicting improvement after surgery (change in mJOA), clinical variables alone performed with 33.3% accuracy (AUC: 0.40). When combining DTI or DBSI parameters with key clinical covariates, model accuracy improved to 66.7% (AUC: 0.65) and 88.1% (AUC: 0.95) accuracy, respectively. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: DBSI metrics correlate with baseline disease severity and outcome measures at 2-years follow-up. Our results suggest that DBSI may serve as a valid non-invasive imaging biomarker for CSM disease severity and potential for postoperative improvement.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866122001911/type/journal_article |
spellingShingle | Justin Zhang Saad Javeed Jacob K. Greenberg Dinal Jayasekera Christopher F. Dibble Jacob Blum Rachel Jakes Peng Sun Sheng-Kwei Song Wilson Z. Ray 338 Diffusion Basis Spectrum Imaging (DBSI) Prognosticates Outcomes for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy after Surgery Journal of Clinical and Translational Science |
title | 338 Diffusion Basis Spectrum Imaging (DBSI) Prognosticates Outcomes for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy after Surgery |
title_full | 338 Diffusion Basis Spectrum Imaging (DBSI) Prognosticates Outcomes for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy after Surgery |
title_fullStr | 338 Diffusion Basis Spectrum Imaging (DBSI) Prognosticates Outcomes for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy after Surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | 338 Diffusion Basis Spectrum Imaging (DBSI) Prognosticates Outcomes for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy after Surgery |
title_short | 338 Diffusion Basis Spectrum Imaging (DBSI) Prognosticates Outcomes for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy after Surgery |
title_sort | 338 diffusion basis spectrum imaging dbsi prognosticates outcomes for cervical spondylotic myelopathy after surgery |
url | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866122001911/type/journal_article |
work_keys_str_mv | AT justinzhang 338diffusionbasisspectrumimagingdbsiprognosticatesoutcomesforcervicalspondyloticmyelopathyaftersurgery AT saadjaveed 338diffusionbasisspectrumimagingdbsiprognosticatesoutcomesforcervicalspondyloticmyelopathyaftersurgery AT jacobkgreenberg 338diffusionbasisspectrumimagingdbsiprognosticatesoutcomesforcervicalspondyloticmyelopathyaftersurgery AT dinaljayasekera 338diffusionbasisspectrumimagingdbsiprognosticatesoutcomesforcervicalspondyloticmyelopathyaftersurgery AT christopherfdibble 338diffusionbasisspectrumimagingdbsiprognosticatesoutcomesforcervicalspondyloticmyelopathyaftersurgery AT jacobblum 338diffusionbasisspectrumimagingdbsiprognosticatesoutcomesforcervicalspondyloticmyelopathyaftersurgery AT racheljakes 338diffusionbasisspectrumimagingdbsiprognosticatesoutcomesforcervicalspondyloticmyelopathyaftersurgery AT pengsun 338diffusionbasisspectrumimagingdbsiprognosticatesoutcomesforcervicalspondyloticmyelopathyaftersurgery AT shengkweisong 338diffusionbasisspectrumimagingdbsiprognosticatesoutcomesforcervicalspondyloticmyelopathyaftersurgery AT wilsonzray 338diffusionbasisspectrumimagingdbsiprognosticatesoutcomesforcervicalspondyloticmyelopathyaftersurgery |