Prevalence and prognostic role of mismatch repair gene defect in endometrial cancer patients

The study was to evaluate the prevalence of mismatch repair gene defect among Thai patients with endometrial cancer and its association with clinico-pathological features and survivals. The formalin fixed paraffin-embedded blocks of EMC tissue from hysterectomy specimens of patients having surgery i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Siriwan Tangjitgamol, Thannaporn Kittisiam, Sujitra Tanvanich
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOS Press 2017-09-01
Series:Tumor Biology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1010428317725834
_version_ 1818727838400905216
author Siriwan Tangjitgamol
Thannaporn Kittisiam
Sujitra Tanvanich
author_facet Siriwan Tangjitgamol
Thannaporn Kittisiam
Sujitra Tanvanich
author_sort Siriwan Tangjitgamol
collection DOAJ
description The study was to evaluate the prevalence of mismatch repair gene defect among Thai patients with endometrial cancer and its association with clinico-pathological features and survivals. The formalin fixed paraffin-embedded blocks of EMC tissue from hysterectomy specimens of patients having surgery in our institution between 1 Jan 1995 and 31 December 2016 were assessed for the immunohistochemical expression of 4 mismatch repair proteins (MLH1, PMS, MSH2, MSH 6). Mismatch repair gene defect was determined by a negative expression of at least 1 protein. Among 385 EMC patients included in the study, mean age was 57.3 ± 10.8 years with 62.3% aged ⩽ 60 years. The most frequent mismatch repair gene defect was MSH6 (38.7%), followed by PMS2 (34.3%), MLH1 (33.2%), and MSH2 (16.4%). Overall, 55.1% showed negative expression of at least one protein. We found significantly higher mismatch repair gene defect in patients aged ⩽ 60 years, with early stage disease, and negative lymph node status than the other comparative groups: 59.2% vs 48.3% for age (p = 0.037), 58.2% vs 45.2% (p = 0.027) for stage, and 58.1% vs 44.6% (p = 0.048) for nodal status. The 5-year progression-free survival, overall survival, and endometrial cancer-specific survival of patients with mismatch repair gene defect was higher than those without gene defect. The differences were statistically significant for only progression-free survival and endometrial cancer-specific survival: 87.7% (95% confidence interval = 83.0%–92.4%) vs 81.5% (95% confidence interval = 75.4%–87.6%) (p = 0.049) for progression-free survival and 91.0% (95% confidence interval = 86.9%–95.1%) vs 85.5% (95% confidence interval = 80.0%–91.0%) (p = 0.044) for endometrial cancer-specific survival, respectively. In conclusion, more than half of Thai endometrial cancer patients had mismatch repair gene defect. The patients with mismatch repair gene defect had significantly younger age (⩽ 60 years) and better prognosis in terms of early stage, negative nodal status, and longer survivals.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T22:20:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6a374470880844ba953bcf85fccc6117
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1423-0380
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T22:20:27Z
publishDate 2017-09-01
publisher IOS Press
record_format Article
series Tumor Biology
spelling doaj.art-6a374470880844ba953bcf85fccc61172022-12-21T21:30:29ZengIOS PressTumor Biology1423-03802017-09-013910.1177/1010428317725834Prevalence and prognostic role of mismatch repair gene defect in endometrial cancer patientsSiriwan Tangjitgamol0Thannaporn Kittisiam1Sujitra Tanvanich2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok, ThailandDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok, ThailandDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok, ThailandThe study was to evaluate the prevalence of mismatch repair gene defect among Thai patients with endometrial cancer and its association with clinico-pathological features and survivals. The formalin fixed paraffin-embedded blocks of EMC tissue from hysterectomy specimens of patients having surgery in our institution between 1 Jan 1995 and 31 December 2016 were assessed for the immunohistochemical expression of 4 mismatch repair proteins (MLH1, PMS, MSH2, MSH 6). Mismatch repair gene defect was determined by a negative expression of at least 1 protein. Among 385 EMC patients included in the study, mean age was 57.3 ± 10.8 years with 62.3% aged ⩽ 60 years. The most frequent mismatch repair gene defect was MSH6 (38.7%), followed by PMS2 (34.3%), MLH1 (33.2%), and MSH2 (16.4%). Overall, 55.1% showed negative expression of at least one protein. We found significantly higher mismatch repair gene defect in patients aged ⩽ 60 years, with early stage disease, and negative lymph node status than the other comparative groups: 59.2% vs 48.3% for age (p = 0.037), 58.2% vs 45.2% (p = 0.027) for stage, and 58.1% vs 44.6% (p = 0.048) for nodal status. The 5-year progression-free survival, overall survival, and endometrial cancer-specific survival of patients with mismatch repair gene defect was higher than those without gene defect. The differences were statistically significant for only progression-free survival and endometrial cancer-specific survival: 87.7% (95% confidence interval = 83.0%–92.4%) vs 81.5% (95% confidence interval = 75.4%–87.6%) (p = 0.049) for progression-free survival and 91.0% (95% confidence interval = 86.9%–95.1%) vs 85.5% (95% confidence interval = 80.0%–91.0%) (p = 0.044) for endometrial cancer-specific survival, respectively. In conclusion, more than half of Thai endometrial cancer patients had mismatch repair gene defect. The patients with mismatch repair gene defect had significantly younger age (⩽ 60 years) and better prognosis in terms of early stage, negative nodal status, and longer survivals.https://doi.org/10.1177/1010428317725834
spellingShingle Siriwan Tangjitgamol
Thannaporn Kittisiam
Sujitra Tanvanich
Prevalence and prognostic role of mismatch repair gene defect in endometrial cancer patients
Tumor Biology
title Prevalence and prognostic role of mismatch repair gene defect in endometrial cancer patients
title_full Prevalence and prognostic role of mismatch repair gene defect in endometrial cancer patients
title_fullStr Prevalence and prognostic role of mismatch repair gene defect in endometrial cancer patients
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence and prognostic role of mismatch repair gene defect in endometrial cancer patients
title_short Prevalence and prognostic role of mismatch repair gene defect in endometrial cancer patients
title_sort prevalence and prognostic role of mismatch repair gene defect in endometrial cancer patients
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1010428317725834
work_keys_str_mv AT siriwantangjitgamol prevalenceandprognosticroleofmismatchrepairgenedefectinendometrialcancerpatients
AT thannapornkittisiam prevalenceandprognosticroleofmismatchrepairgenedefectinendometrialcancerpatients
AT sujitratanvanich prevalenceandprognosticroleofmismatchrepairgenedefectinendometrialcancerpatients