Identifying transferable lessons from cholera epidemic responses by Médecins Sans Frontières in Mozambique, Malawi and the Democratic Republic of Congo, 2015–2018: a scoping review

Abstract Background Cholera epidemics occur frequently in low-income countries affected by concurrent humanitarian crises. Evaluations of these epidemic response remains largely unpublished and there is a need to generate evidence on response efforts to inform future programmes. This review of MSF c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lauren D’Mello-Guyett, Oliver Cumming, Elliot Rogers, Rob D’hondt, Estifanos Mengitsu, Maria Mashako, Rafael Van den Bergh, Placide Okitayemba Welo, Peter Maes, Francesco Checchi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-03-01
Series:Conflict and Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-022-00445-1
_version_ 1811272028356870144
author Lauren D’Mello-Guyett
Oliver Cumming
Elliot Rogers
Rob D’hondt
Estifanos Mengitsu
Maria Mashako
Rafael Van den Bergh
Placide Okitayemba Welo
Peter Maes
Francesco Checchi
author_facet Lauren D’Mello-Guyett
Oliver Cumming
Elliot Rogers
Rob D’hondt
Estifanos Mengitsu
Maria Mashako
Rafael Van den Bergh
Placide Okitayemba Welo
Peter Maes
Francesco Checchi
author_sort Lauren D’Mello-Guyett
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Cholera epidemics occur frequently in low-income countries affected by concurrent humanitarian crises. Evaluations of these epidemic response remains largely unpublished and there is a need to generate evidence on response efforts to inform future programmes. This review of MSF cholera epidemic responses aimed to describe the main characteristics of the cholera epidemics and related responses in these three countries, to identify challenges to different intervention strategies based on available data; and to make recommendations for epidemic prevention and control practice and policy. Methods Case studies from the Democratic Republic of Congo, Malawi and Mozambique were purposively selected by MSF for this review due to the documented burden of cholera in each country, frequency of cholera outbreaks, and risk of humanitarian crises. Data were extracted on the characteristics of the epidemics; time between alert and response; and, the delivery of health and water, sanitation and hygiene interventions. A Theory of Change for cholera response programmes was built to assess factors that affected implementation of the responses. Results and conclusions 20 epidemic response reports were identified, 15 in DRC, one in Malawi and four in Mozambique. All contexts experienced concurrent humanitarian crises, either armed conflict or natural disasters. Across the settings, median time between the date of alert and date of the start of the response by MSF was 23 days (IQR 14–41). Almost all responses targeted interventions community-wide, and all responses implemented in-patient treatment of suspected cholera cases in either established health care facilities (HCFs) or temporary cholera treatment units (CTUs). In three responses, interventions were delivered as case-area targeted interventions (CATI) and four responses targeted households of admitted suspected cholera cases. CATI or delivery of interventions to households of admitted suspected cases occurred from 2017 onwards only. Overall, 74 factors affecting implementation were identified including delayed supplies of materials, insufficient quantities of materials and limited or lack of coordination with local government or other agencies. Based on this review, the following recommendations are made to improve cholera prevention and control efforts: explore improved models for epidemic preparedness, including rapid mobilisation of supplies and deployment of trained staff; invest in and strengthen partnerships with national and local government and other agencies; and to standardise reporting templates that allow for rigorous and structured evaluations within and across countries to provide consistent and accessible data.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T22:32:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6a5267cda66c4b39a6ef35c2bb0da055
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1752-1505
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T22:32:50Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Conflict and Health
spelling doaj.art-6a5267cda66c4b39a6ef35c2bb0da0552022-12-22T03:13:56ZengBMCConflict and Health1752-15052022-03-0116111310.1186/s13031-022-00445-1Identifying transferable lessons from cholera epidemic responses by Médecins Sans Frontières in Mozambique, Malawi and the Democratic Republic of Congo, 2015–2018: a scoping reviewLauren D’Mello-Guyett0Oliver Cumming1Elliot Rogers2Rob D’hondt3Estifanos Mengitsu4Maria Mashako5Rafael Van den Bergh6Placide Okitayemba Welo7Peter Maes8Francesco Checchi9Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineDepartment of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineDepartment of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineEnvironmental Health Unit, Médecins Sans FrontièresEnvironmental Health Unit, Médecins Sans FrontièresMédecins Sans FrontièresLuxOR, Luxembourg Operational Research Unit, Médecins Sans FrontièresProgramme National d’Elimination du Choléra et de lutte contre les autres Maladies DiarrhéiquesWASH Section, UNICEFDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineAbstract Background Cholera epidemics occur frequently in low-income countries affected by concurrent humanitarian crises. Evaluations of these epidemic response remains largely unpublished and there is a need to generate evidence on response efforts to inform future programmes. This review of MSF cholera epidemic responses aimed to describe the main characteristics of the cholera epidemics and related responses in these three countries, to identify challenges to different intervention strategies based on available data; and to make recommendations for epidemic prevention and control practice and policy. Methods Case studies from the Democratic Republic of Congo, Malawi and Mozambique were purposively selected by MSF for this review due to the documented burden of cholera in each country, frequency of cholera outbreaks, and risk of humanitarian crises. Data were extracted on the characteristics of the epidemics; time between alert and response; and, the delivery of health and water, sanitation and hygiene interventions. A Theory of Change for cholera response programmes was built to assess factors that affected implementation of the responses. Results and conclusions 20 epidemic response reports were identified, 15 in DRC, one in Malawi and four in Mozambique. All contexts experienced concurrent humanitarian crises, either armed conflict or natural disasters. Across the settings, median time between the date of alert and date of the start of the response by MSF was 23 days (IQR 14–41). Almost all responses targeted interventions community-wide, and all responses implemented in-patient treatment of suspected cholera cases in either established health care facilities (HCFs) or temporary cholera treatment units (CTUs). In three responses, interventions were delivered as case-area targeted interventions (CATI) and four responses targeted households of admitted suspected cholera cases. CATI or delivery of interventions to households of admitted suspected cases occurred from 2017 onwards only. Overall, 74 factors affecting implementation were identified including delayed supplies of materials, insufficient quantities of materials and limited or lack of coordination with local government or other agencies. Based on this review, the following recommendations are made to improve cholera prevention and control efforts: explore improved models for epidemic preparedness, including rapid mobilisation of supplies and deployment of trained staff; invest in and strengthen partnerships with national and local government and other agencies; and to standardise reporting templates that allow for rigorous and structured evaluations within and across countries to provide consistent and accessible data.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-022-00445-1CholeraOutbreaksEmergencyWaterSanitationHygiene
spellingShingle Lauren D’Mello-Guyett
Oliver Cumming
Elliot Rogers
Rob D’hondt
Estifanos Mengitsu
Maria Mashako
Rafael Van den Bergh
Placide Okitayemba Welo
Peter Maes
Francesco Checchi
Identifying transferable lessons from cholera epidemic responses by Médecins Sans Frontières in Mozambique, Malawi and the Democratic Republic of Congo, 2015–2018: a scoping review
Conflict and Health
Cholera
Outbreaks
Emergency
Water
Sanitation
Hygiene
title Identifying transferable lessons from cholera epidemic responses by Médecins Sans Frontières in Mozambique, Malawi and the Democratic Republic of Congo, 2015–2018: a scoping review
title_full Identifying transferable lessons from cholera epidemic responses by Médecins Sans Frontières in Mozambique, Malawi and the Democratic Republic of Congo, 2015–2018: a scoping review
title_fullStr Identifying transferable lessons from cholera epidemic responses by Médecins Sans Frontières in Mozambique, Malawi and the Democratic Republic of Congo, 2015–2018: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Identifying transferable lessons from cholera epidemic responses by Médecins Sans Frontières in Mozambique, Malawi and the Democratic Republic of Congo, 2015–2018: a scoping review
title_short Identifying transferable lessons from cholera epidemic responses by Médecins Sans Frontières in Mozambique, Malawi and the Democratic Republic of Congo, 2015–2018: a scoping review
title_sort identifying transferable lessons from cholera epidemic responses by medecins sans frontieres in mozambique malawi and the democratic republic of congo 2015 2018 a scoping review
topic Cholera
Outbreaks
Emergency
Water
Sanitation
Hygiene
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-022-00445-1
work_keys_str_mv AT laurendmelloguyett identifyingtransferablelessonsfromcholeraepidemicresponsesbymedecinssansfrontieresinmozambiquemalawiandthedemocraticrepublicofcongo20152018ascopingreview
AT olivercumming identifyingtransferablelessonsfromcholeraepidemicresponsesbymedecinssansfrontieresinmozambiquemalawiandthedemocraticrepublicofcongo20152018ascopingreview
AT elliotrogers identifyingtransferablelessonsfromcholeraepidemicresponsesbymedecinssansfrontieresinmozambiquemalawiandthedemocraticrepublicofcongo20152018ascopingreview
AT robdhondt identifyingtransferablelessonsfromcholeraepidemicresponsesbymedecinssansfrontieresinmozambiquemalawiandthedemocraticrepublicofcongo20152018ascopingreview
AT estifanosmengitsu identifyingtransferablelessonsfromcholeraepidemicresponsesbymedecinssansfrontieresinmozambiquemalawiandthedemocraticrepublicofcongo20152018ascopingreview
AT mariamashako identifyingtransferablelessonsfromcholeraepidemicresponsesbymedecinssansfrontieresinmozambiquemalawiandthedemocraticrepublicofcongo20152018ascopingreview
AT rafaelvandenbergh identifyingtransferablelessonsfromcholeraepidemicresponsesbymedecinssansfrontieresinmozambiquemalawiandthedemocraticrepublicofcongo20152018ascopingreview
AT placideokitayembawelo identifyingtransferablelessonsfromcholeraepidemicresponsesbymedecinssansfrontieresinmozambiquemalawiandthedemocraticrepublicofcongo20152018ascopingreview
AT petermaes identifyingtransferablelessonsfromcholeraepidemicresponsesbymedecinssansfrontieresinmozambiquemalawiandthedemocraticrepublicofcongo20152018ascopingreview
AT francescochecchi identifyingtransferablelessonsfromcholeraepidemicresponsesbymedecinssansfrontieresinmozambiquemalawiandthedemocraticrepublicofcongo20152018ascopingreview