Identifying transferable lessons from cholera epidemic responses by Médecins Sans Frontières in Mozambique, Malawi and the Democratic Republic of Congo, 2015–2018: a scoping review
Abstract Background Cholera epidemics occur frequently in low-income countries affected by concurrent humanitarian crises. Evaluations of these epidemic response remains largely unpublished and there is a need to generate evidence on response efforts to inform future programmes. This review of MSF c...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2022-03-01
|
Series: | Conflict and Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-022-00445-1 |
_version_ | 1811272028356870144 |
---|---|
author | Lauren D’Mello-Guyett Oliver Cumming Elliot Rogers Rob D’hondt Estifanos Mengitsu Maria Mashako Rafael Van den Bergh Placide Okitayemba Welo Peter Maes Francesco Checchi |
author_facet | Lauren D’Mello-Guyett Oliver Cumming Elliot Rogers Rob D’hondt Estifanos Mengitsu Maria Mashako Rafael Van den Bergh Placide Okitayemba Welo Peter Maes Francesco Checchi |
author_sort | Lauren D’Mello-Guyett |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background Cholera epidemics occur frequently in low-income countries affected by concurrent humanitarian crises. Evaluations of these epidemic response remains largely unpublished and there is a need to generate evidence on response efforts to inform future programmes. This review of MSF cholera epidemic responses aimed to describe the main characteristics of the cholera epidemics and related responses in these three countries, to identify challenges to different intervention strategies based on available data; and to make recommendations for epidemic prevention and control practice and policy. Methods Case studies from the Democratic Republic of Congo, Malawi and Mozambique were purposively selected by MSF for this review due to the documented burden of cholera in each country, frequency of cholera outbreaks, and risk of humanitarian crises. Data were extracted on the characteristics of the epidemics; time between alert and response; and, the delivery of health and water, sanitation and hygiene interventions. A Theory of Change for cholera response programmes was built to assess factors that affected implementation of the responses. Results and conclusions 20 epidemic response reports were identified, 15 in DRC, one in Malawi and four in Mozambique. All contexts experienced concurrent humanitarian crises, either armed conflict or natural disasters. Across the settings, median time between the date of alert and date of the start of the response by MSF was 23 days (IQR 14–41). Almost all responses targeted interventions community-wide, and all responses implemented in-patient treatment of suspected cholera cases in either established health care facilities (HCFs) or temporary cholera treatment units (CTUs). In three responses, interventions were delivered as case-area targeted interventions (CATI) and four responses targeted households of admitted suspected cholera cases. CATI or delivery of interventions to households of admitted suspected cases occurred from 2017 onwards only. Overall, 74 factors affecting implementation were identified including delayed supplies of materials, insufficient quantities of materials and limited or lack of coordination with local government or other agencies. Based on this review, the following recommendations are made to improve cholera prevention and control efforts: explore improved models for epidemic preparedness, including rapid mobilisation of supplies and deployment of trained staff; invest in and strengthen partnerships with national and local government and other agencies; and to standardise reporting templates that allow for rigorous and structured evaluations within and across countries to provide consistent and accessible data. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-12T22:32:50Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-6a5267cda66c4b39a6ef35c2bb0da055 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1752-1505 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-12T22:32:50Z |
publishDate | 2022-03-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | Conflict and Health |
spelling | doaj.art-6a5267cda66c4b39a6ef35c2bb0da0552022-12-22T03:13:56ZengBMCConflict and Health1752-15052022-03-0116111310.1186/s13031-022-00445-1Identifying transferable lessons from cholera epidemic responses by Médecins Sans Frontières in Mozambique, Malawi and the Democratic Republic of Congo, 2015–2018: a scoping reviewLauren D’Mello-Guyett0Oliver Cumming1Elliot Rogers2Rob D’hondt3Estifanos Mengitsu4Maria Mashako5Rafael Van den Bergh6Placide Okitayemba Welo7Peter Maes8Francesco Checchi9Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineDepartment of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineDepartment of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineEnvironmental Health Unit, Médecins Sans FrontièresEnvironmental Health Unit, Médecins Sans FrontièresMédecins Sans FrontièresLuxOR, Luxembourg Operational Research Unit, Médecins Sans FrontièresProgramme National d’Elimination du Choléra et de lutte contre les autres Maladies DiarrhéiquesWASH Section, UNICEFDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineAbstract Background Cholera epidemics occur frequently in low-income countries affected by concurrent humanitarian crises. Evaluations of these epidemic response remains largely unpublished and there is a need to generate evidence on response efforts to inform future programmes. This review of MSF cholera epidemic responses aimed to describe the main characteristics of the cholera epidemics and related responses in these three countries, to identify challenges to different intervention strategies based on available data; and to make recommendations for epidemic prevention and control practice and policy. Methods Case studies from the Democratic Republic of Congo, Malawi and Mozambique were purposively selected by MSF for this review due to the documented burden of cholera in each country, frequency of cholera outbreaks, and risk of humanitarian crises. Data were extracted on the characteristics of the epidemics; time between alert and response; and, the delivery of health and water, sanitation and hygiene interventions. A Theory of Change for cholera response programmes was built to assess factors that affected implementation of the responses. Results and conclusions 20 epidemic response reports were identified, 15 in DRC, one in Malawi and four in Mozambique. All contexts experienced concurrent humanitarian crises, either armed conflict or natural disasters. Across the settings, median time between the date of alert and date of the start of the response by MSF was 23 days (IQR 14–41). Almost all responses targeted interventions community-wide, and all responses implemented in-patient treatment of suspected cholera cases in either established health care facilities (HCFs) or temporary cholera treatment units (CTUs). In three responses, interventions were delivered as case-area targeted interventions (CATI) and four responses targeted households of admitted suspected cholera cases. CATI or delivery of interventions to households of admitted suspected cases occurred from 2017 onwards only. Overall, 74 factors affecting implementation were identified including delayed supplies of materials, insufficient quantities of materials and limited or lack of coordination with local government or other agencies. Based on this review, the following recommendations are made to improve cholera prevention and control efforts: explore improved models for epidemic preparedness, including rapid mobilisation of supplies and deployment of trained staff; invest in and strengthen partnerships with national and local government and other agencies; and to standardise reporting templates that allow for rigorous and structured evaluations within and across countries to provide consistent and accessible data.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-022-00445-1CholeraOutbreaksEmergencyWaterSanitationHygiene |
spellingShingle | Lauren D’Mello-Guyett Oliver Cumming Elliot Rogers Rob D’hondt Estifanos Mengitsu Maria Mashako Rafael Van den Bergh Placide Okitayemba Welo Peter Maes Francesco Checchi Identifying transferable lessons from cholera epidemic responses by Médecins Sans Frontières in Mozambique, Malawi and the Democratic Republic of Congo, 2015–2018: a scoping review Conflict and Health Cholera Outbreaks Emergency Water Sanitation Hygiene |
title | Identifying transferable lessons from cholera epidemic responses by Médecins Sans Frontières in Mozambique, Malawi and the Democratic Republic of Congo, 2015–2018: a scoping review |
title_full | Identifying transferable lessons from cholera epidemic responses by Médecins Sans Frontières in Mozambique, Malawi and the Democratic Republic of Congo, 2015–2018: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | Identifying transferable lessons from cholera epidemic responses by Médecins Sans Frontières in Mozambique, Malawi and the Democratic Republic of Congo, 2015–2018: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Identifying transferable lessons from cholera epidemic responses by Médecins Sans Frontières in Mozambique, Malawi and the Democratic Republic of Congo, 2015–2018: a scoping review |
title_short | Identifying transferable lessons from cholera epidemic responses by Médecins Sans Frontières in Mozambique, Malawi and the Democratic Republic of Congo, 2015–2018: a scoping review |
title_sort | identifying transferable lessons from cholera epidemic responses by medecins sans frontieres in mozambique malawi and the democratic republic of congo 2015 2018 a scoping review |
topic | Cholera Outbreaks Emergency Water Sanitation Hygiene |
url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-022-00445-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT laurendmelloguyett identifyingtransferablelessonsfromcholeraepidemicresponsesbymedecinssansfrontieresinmozambiquemalawiandthedemocraticrepublicofcongo20152018ascopingreview AT olivercumming identifyingtransferablelessonsfromcholeraepidemicresponsesbymedecinssansfrontieresinmozambiquemalawiandthedemocraticrepublicofcongo20152018ascopingreview AT elliotrogers identifyingtransferablelessonsfromcholeraepidemicresponsesbymedecinssansfrontieresinmozambiquemalawiandthedemocraticrepublicofcongo20152018ascopingreview AT robdhondt identifyingtransferablelessonsfromcholeraepidemicresponsesbymedecinssansfrontieresinmozambiquemalawiandthedemocraticrepublicofcongo20152018ascopingreview AT estifanosmengitsu identifyingtransferablelessonsfromcholeraepidemicresponsesbymedecinssansfrontieresinmozambiquemalawiandthedemocraticrepublicofcongo20152018ascopingreview AT mariamashako identifyingtransferablelessonsfromcholeraepidemicresponsesbymedecinssansfrontieresinmozambiquemalawiandthedemocraticrepublicofcongo20152018ascopingreview AT rafaelvandenbergh identifyingtransferablelessonsfromcholeraepidemicresponsesbymedecinssansfrontieresinmozambiquemalawiandthedemocraticrepublicofcongo20152018ascopingreview AT placideokitayembawelo identifyingtransferablelessonsfromcholeraepidemicresponsesbymedecinssansfrontieresinmozambiquemalawiandthedemocraticrepublicofcongo20152018ascopingreview AT petermaes identifyingtransferablelessonsfromcholeraepidemicresponsesbymedecinssansfrontieresinmozambiquemalawiandthedemocraticrepublicofcongo20152018ascopingreview AT francescochecchi identifyingtransferablelessonsfromcholeraepidemicresponsesbymedecinssansfrontieresinmozambiquemalawiandthedemocraticrepublicofcongo20152018ascopingreview |