Robustness of Corner-Supported Modular Steel Buildings with Core Walls
This paper studies the dynamic response of corner-supported modular steel buildings with a core wall system, under progressive collapse scenarios, associated with corner module removals. Since using secondary systems such as concrete core in mid- to high-rise buildings is currently unavoidable, unde...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2024-01-01
|
Series: | Buildings |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/14/1/235 |
_version_ | 1797340012828688384 |
---|---|
author | Ramtin Hajirezaei Pejman Sharafi Kamyar Kildashti Mohammad Alembagheri |
author_facet | Ramtin Hajirezaei Pejman Sharafi Kamyar Kildashti Mohammad Alembagheri |
author_sort | Ramtin Hajirezaei |
collection | DOAJ |
description | This paper studies the dynamic response of corner-supported modular steel buildings with a core wall system, under progressive collapse scenarios, associated with corner module removals. Since using secondary systems such as concrete core in mid- to high-rise buildings is currently unavoidable, understanding their impact on load transfer between modules during collapse scenarios becomes essential. The designated four-, eight-, and twelve-story buildings were modelled using the macro-model-based finite element method in Abaqus. In addition, three different locations are considered for the concrete shear core within the building plan, leading to nine various case scenarios. Each vertical and horizontal inter-module connection was modelled by one axial and two shear springs with predefined nonlinear force-displacement behavior. The local and global buckling, which plays an essential role in the building’s stability, was considered to obtain accurate results. Finally, parametric studies on the building response were carried out, including the intra-module connection rigidity and inter-module connection stiffness. The results demonstrated that the core wall could maintain the robustness of a modular steel building through two mechanisms dependent on its location within the plan. In addition, preventing plastic hinges from forming in beams could be introduced as an anti-collapse mechanism in the corner module removal scenarios. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-08T09:55:50Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-6a602bc34bf8404da2ac203033455068 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2075-5309 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-08T09:55:50Z |
publishDate | 2024-01-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Buildings |
spelling | doaj.art-6a602bc34bf8404da2ac2030334550682024-01-29T13:49:24ZengMDPI AGBuildings2075-53092024-01-0114123510.3390/buildings14010235Robustness of Corner-Supported Modular Steel Buildings with Core WallsRamtin Hajirezaei0Pejman Sharafi1Kamyar Kildashti2Mohammad Alembagheri3Centre for Infrastructure Engineering, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW 2000, AustraliaCentre for Infrastructure Engineering, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW 2000, AustraliaCentre for Infrastructure Engineering, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW 2000, AustraliaCentre for Infrastructure Engineering, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW 2000, AustraliaThis paper studies the dynamic response of corner-supported modular steel buildings with a core wall system, under progressive collapse scenarios, associated with corner module removals. Since using secondary systems such as concrete core in mid- to high-rise buildings is currently unavoidable, understanding their impact on load transfer between modules during collapse scenarios becomes essential. The designated four-, eight-, and twelve-story buildings were modelled using the macro-model-based finite element method in Abaqus. In addition, three different locations are considered for the concrete shear core within the building plan, leading to nine various case scenarios. Each vertical and horizontal inter-module connection was modelled by one axial and two shear springs with predefined nonlinear force-displacement behavior. The local and global buckling, which plays an essential role in the building’s stability, was considered to obtain accurate results. Finally, parametric studies on the building response were carried out, including the intra-module connection rigidity and inter-module connection stiffness. The results demonstrated that the core wall could maintain the robustness of a modular steel building through two mechanisms dependent on its location within the plan. In addition, preventing plastic hinges from forming in beams could be introduced as an anti-collapse mechanism in the corner module removal scenarios.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/14/1/235anti-collapseshear wallprogressive collapseplastic hingerobustnessbuckling |
spellingShingle | Ramtin Hajirezaei Pejman Sharafi Kamyar Kildashti Mohammad Alembagheri Robustness of Corner-Supported Modular Steel Buildings with Core Walls Buildings anti-collapse shear wall progressive collapse plastic hinge robustness buckling |
title | Robustness of Corner-Supported Modular Steel Buildings with Core Walls |
title_full | Robustness of Corner-Supported Modular Steel Buildings with Core Walls |
title_fullStr | Robustness of Corner-Supported Modular Steel Buildings with Core Walls |
title_full_unstemmed | Robustness of Corner-Supported Modular Steel Buildings with Core Walls |
title_short | Robustness of Corner-Supported Modular Steel Buildings with Core Walls |
title_sort | robustness of corner supported modular steel buildings with core walls |
topic | anti-collapse shear wall progressive collapse plastic hinge robustness buckling |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/14/1/235 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ramtinhajirezaei robustnessofcornersupportedmodularsteelbuildingswithcorewalls AT pejmansharafi robustnessofcornersupportedmodularsteelbuildingswithcorewalls AT kamyarkildashti robustnessofcornersupportedmodularsteelbuildingswithcorewalls AT mohammadalembagheri robustnessofcornersupportedmodularsteelbuildingswithcorewalls |