Robustness of Corner-Supported Modular Steel Buildings with Core Walls

This paper studies the dynamic response of corner-supported modular steel buildings with a core wall system, under progressive collapse scenarios, associated with corner module removals. Since using secondary systems such as concrete core in mid- to high-rise buildings is currently unavoidable, unde...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ramtin Hajirezaei, Pejman Sharafi, Kamyar Kildashti, Mohammad Alembagheri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-01-01
Series:Buildings
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/14/1/235
_version_ 1797340012828688384
author Ramtin Hajirezaei
Pejman Sharafi
Kamyar Kildashti
Mohammad Alembagheri
author_facet Ramtin Hajirezaei
Pejman Sharafi
Kamyar Kildashti
Mohammad Alembagheri
author_sort Ramtin Hajirezaei
collection DOAJ
description This paper studies the dynamic response of corner-supported modular steel buildings with a core wall system, under progressive collapse scenarios, associated with corner module removals. Since using secondary systems such as concrete core in mid- to high-rise buildings is currently unavoidable, understanding their impact on load transfer between modules during collapse scenarios becomes essential. The designated four-, eight-, and twelve-story buildings were modelled using the macro-model-based finite element method in Abaqus. In addition, three different locations are considered for the concrete shear core within the building plan, leading to nine various case scenarios. Each vertical and horizontal inter-module connection was modelled by one axial and two shear springs with predefined nonlinear force-displacement behavior. The local and global buckling, which plays an essential role in the building’s stability, was considered to obtain accurate results. Finally, parametric studies on the building response were carried out, including the intra-module connection rigidity and inter-module connection stiffness. The results demonstrated that the core wall could maintain the robustness of a modular steel building through two mechanisms dependent on its location within the plan. In addition, preventing plastic hinges from forming in beams could be introduced as an anti-collapse mechanism in the corner module removal scenarios.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T09:55:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6a602bc34bf8404da2ac203033455068
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-5309
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T09:55:50Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Buildings
spelling doaj.art-6a602bc34bf8404da2ac2030334550682024-01-29T13:49:24ZengMDPI AGBuildings2075-53092024-01-0114123510.3390/buildings14010235Robustness of Corner-Supported Modular Steel Buildings with Core WallsRamtin Hajirezaei0Pejman Sharafi1Kamyar Kildashti2Mohammad Alembagheri3Centre for Infrastructure Engineering, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW 2000, AustraliaCentre for Infrastructure Engineering, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW 2000, AustraliaCentre for Infrastructure Engineering, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW 2000, AustraliaCentre for Infrastructure Engineering, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW 2000, AustraliaThis paper studies the dynamic response of corner-supported modular steel buildings with a core wall system, under progressive collapse scenarios, associated with corner module removals. Since using secondary systems such as concrete core in mid- to high-rise buildings is currently unavoidable, understanding their impact on load transfer between modules during collapse scenarios becomes essential. The designated four-, eight-, and twelve-story buildings were modelled using the macro-model-based finite element method in Abaqus. In addition, three different locations are considered for the concrete shear core within the building plan, leading to nine various case scenarios. Each vertical and horizontal inter-module connection was modelled by one axial and two shear springs with predefined nonlinear force-displacement behavior. The local and global buckling, which plays an essential role in the building’s stability, was considered to obtain accurate results. Finally, parametric studies on the building response were carried out, including the intra-module connection rigidity and inter-module connection stiffness. The results demonstrated that the core wall could maintain the robustness of a modular steel building through two mechanisms dependent on its location within the plan. In addition, preventing plastic hinges from forming in beams could be introduced as an anti-collapse mechanism in the corner module removal scenarios.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/14/1/235anti-collapseshear wallprogressive collapseplastic hingerobustnessbuckling
spellingShingle Ramtin Hajirezaei
Pejman Sharafi
Kamyar Kildashti
Mohammad Alembagheri
Robustness of Corner-Supported Modular Steel Buildings with Core Walls
Buildings
anti-collapse
shear wall
progressive collapse
plastic hinge
robustness
buckling
title Robustness of Corner-Supported Modular Steel Buildings with Core Walls
title_full Robustness of Corner-Supported Modular Steel Buildings with Core Walls
title_fullStr Robustness of Corner-Supported Modular Steel Buildings with Core Walls
title_full_unstemmed Robustness of Corner-Supported Modular Steel Buildings with Core Walls
title_short Robustness of Corner-Supported Modular Steel Buildings with Core Walls
title_sort robustness of corner supported modular steel buildings with core walls
topic anti-collapse
shear wall
progressive collapse
plastic hinge
robustness
buckling
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/14/1/235
work_keys_str_mv AT ramtinhajirezaei robustnessofcornersupportedmodularsteelbuildingswithcorewalls
AT pejmansharafi robustnessofcornersupportedmodularsteelbuildingswithcorewalls
AT kamyarkildashti robustnessofcornersupportedmodularsteelbuildingswithcorewalls
AT mohammadalembagheri robustnessofcornersupportedmodularsteelbuildingswithcorewalls