Patient-Centered Identification of Meaningful Regulatory Endpoints for Medical Devices to Treat Parkinson’s Disease

Introduction. A growing literature has developed on identifying outcomes that matter to patients. This study demonstrates an approach involving patient and regulatory perspectives to identify outcomes that are meaningful in the context of medical devices for Parkinson’s disease (PD). Methods. A syst...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Heather L. Benz, Brittany Caldwell, John P. Ruiz, Anindita Saha, Martin Ho, Stephanie Christopher, Dawn Bardot, Margaret Sheehan, Anne Donnelly, Lauren McLaughlin, Brennan Mange, A. Brett Hauber, Katrina Gwinn, William J. Heetderks, Murray Sheldon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2021-06-01
Series:MDM Policy & Practice
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/23814683211021380
_version_ 1819136157962731520
author Heather L. Benz
Brittany Caldwell
John P. Ruiz
Anindita Saha
Martin Ho
Stephanie Christopher
Dawn Bardot
Margaret Sheehan
Anne Donnelly
Lauren McLaughlin
Brennan Mange
A. Brett Hauber
Katrina Gwinn
William J. Heetderks
Murray Sheldon
author_facet Heather L. Benz
Brittany Caldwell
John P. Ruiz
Anindita Saha
Martin Ho
Stephanie Christopher
Dawn Bardot
Margaret Sheehan
Anne Donnelly
Lauren McLaughlin
Brennan Mange
A. Brett Hauber
Katrina Gwinn
William J. Heetderks
Murray Sheldon
author_sort Heather L. Benz
collection DOAJ
description Introduction. A growing literature has developed on identifying outcomes that matter to patients. This study demonstrates an approach involving patient and regulatory perspectives to identify outcomes that are meaningful in the context of medical devices for Parkinson’s disease (PD). Methods. A systematic process was used for specifying relevant regulatory endpoints by synthesizing inputs of various sources and stakeholders. First, a literature review was conducted to identify important benefits, risks, and other considerations for medical devices to treat PD; patient discussion groups ( n = 6) were conducted to refine the list of considerations, followed by a survey ( n = 29) to prioritize them; and patient and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reviewers informed specification of the final endpoints. Two FDA clinicians gave clinical and regulatory perspectives at each step. Results. Movement symptoms were ranked as most important (ranked 1 or 2 by 72% of participants) and psychological and cognitive symptoms as the next most important (ranked 1 or 2 by 52% of participants). Within movement symptoms, falls, impaired movement, bradykinesia, resting tremor, stiffness, and rigidity were ranked highly. Overall, nine attributes were identified and prioritized as patient-centric for use in clinical trial design and quantitative patient preference studies. These attributes were benefits and risks related to therapeutics for PD as well as other considerations, including time until a medical device is available for patient use. Discussion. This prospective approach identified meaningful and relevant benefits, risks, and other considerations that may be used for clinical trial design and quantitative patient preference studies. Although PD was the focus of this study, the approach can be used to study patient perspectives about other disease or treatment areas.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T10:30:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6a7002492e084b97aa87470ac6820e3a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2381-4683
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T10:30:31Z
publishDate 2021-06-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series MDM Policy & Practice
spelling doaj.art-6a7002492e084b97aa87470ac6820e3a2022-12-21T18:29:21ZengSAGE PublishingMDM Policy & Practice2381-46832021-06-01610.1177/23814683211021380Patient-Centered Identification of Meaningful Regulatory Endpoints for Medical Devices to Treat Parkinson’s DiseaseHeather L. BenzBrittany CaldwellJohn P. RuizAnindita SahaMartin HoStephanie ChristopherDawn BardotMargaret SheehanAnne DonnellyLauren McLaughlinBrennan MangeA. Brett HauberKatrina GwinnWilliam J. HeetderksMurray SheldonIntroduction. A growing literature has developed on identifying outcomes that matter to patients. This study demonstrates an approach involving patient and regulatory perspectives to identify outcomes that are meaningful in the context of medical devices for Parkinson’s disease (PD). Methods. A systematic process was used for specifying relevant regulatory endpoints by synthesizing inputs of various sources and stakeholders. First, a literature review was conducted to identify important benefits, risks, and other considerations for medical devices to treat PD; patient discussion groups ( n = 6) were conducted to refine the list of considerations, followed by a survey ( n = 29) to prioritize them; and patient and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reviewers informed specification of the final endpoints. Two FDA clinicians gave clinical and regulatory perspectives at each step. Results. Movement symptoms were ranked as most important (ranked 1 or 2 by 72% of participants) and psychological and cognitive symptoms as the next most important (ranked 1 or 2 by 52% of participants). Within movement symptoms, falls, impaired movement, bradykinesia, resting tremor, stiffness, and rigidity were ranked highly. Overall, nine attributes were identified and prioritized as patient-centric for use in clinical trial design and quantitative patient preference studies. These attributes were benefits and risks related to therapeutics for PD as well as other considerations, including time until a medical device is available for patient use. Discussion. This prospective approach identified meaningful and relevant benefits, risks, and other considerations that may be used for clinical trial design and quantitative patient preference studies. Although PD was the focus of this study, the approach can be used to study patient perspectives about other disease or treatment areas.https://doi.org/10.1177/23814683211021380
spellingShingle Heather L. Benz
Brittany Caldwell
John P. Ruiz
Anindita Saha
Martin Ho
Stephanie Christopher
Dawn Bardot
Margaret Sheehan
Anne Donnelly
Lauren McLaughlin
Brennan Mange
A. Brett Hauber
Katrina Gwinn
William J. Heetderks
Murray Sheldon
Patient-Centered Identification of Meaningful Regulatory Endpoints for Medical Devices to Treat Parkinson’s Disease
MDM Policy & Practice
title Patient-Centered Identification of Meaningful Regulatory Endpoints for Medical Devices to Treat Parkinson’s Disease
title_full Patient-Centered Identification of Meaningful Regulatory Endpoints for Medical Devices to Treat Parkinson’s Disease
title_fullStr Patient-Centered Identification of Meaningful Regulatory Endpoints for Medical Devices to Treat Parkinson’s Disease
title_full_unstemmed Patient-Centered Identification of Meaningful Regulatory Endpoints for Medical Devices to Treat Parkinson’s Disease
title_short Patient-Centered Identification of Meaningful Regulatory Endpoints for Medical Devices to Treat Parkinson’s Disease
title_sort patient centered identification of meaningful regulatory endpoints for medical devices to treat parkinson s disease
url https://doi.org/10.1177/23814683211021380
work_keys_str_mv AT heatherlbenz patientcenteredidentificationofmeaningfulregulatoryendpointsformedicaldevicestotreatparkinsonsdisease
AT brittanycaldwell patientcenteredidentificationofmeaningfulregulatoryendpointsformedicaldevicestotreatparkinsonsdisease
AT johnpruiz patientcenteredidentificationofmeaningfulregulatoryendpointsformedicaldevicestotreatparkinsonsdisease
AT aninditasaha patientcenteredidentificationofmeaningfulregulatoryendpointsformedicaldevicestotreatparkinsonsdisease
AT martinho patientcenteredidentificationofmeaningfulregulatoryendpointsformedicaldevicestotreatparkinsonsdisease
AT stephaniechristopher patientcenteredidentificationofmeaningfulregulatoryendpointsformedicaldevicestotreatparkinsonsdisease
AT dawnbardot patientcenteredidentificationofmeaningfulregulatoryendpointsformedicaldevicestotreatparkinsonsdisease
AT margaretsheehan patientcenteredidentificationofmeaningfulregulatoryendpointsformedicaldevicestotreatparkinsonsdisease
AT annedonnelly patientcenteredidentificationofmeaningfulregulatoryendpointsformedicaldevicestotreatparkinsonsdisease
AT laurenmclaughlin patientcenteredidentificationofmeaningfulregulatoryendpointsformedicaldevicestotreatparkinsonsdisease
AT brennanmange patientcenteredidentificationofmeaningfulregulatoryendpointsformedicaldevicestotreatparkinsonsdisease
AT abretthauber patientcenteredidentificationofmeaningfulregulatoryendpointsformedicaldevicestotreatparkinsonsdisease
AT katrinagwinn patientcenteredidentificationofmeaningfulregulatoryendpointsformedicaldevicestotreatparkinsonsdisease
AT williamjheetderks patientcenteredidentificationofmeaningfulregulatoryendpointsformedicaldevicestotreatparkinsonsdisease
AT murraysheldon patientcenteredidentificationofmeaningfulregulatoryendpointsformedicaldevicestotreatparkinsonsdisease