Prostate artery embolization has long term efficacy for treatment of severe lower urinary tract symptoms from giant prostatic hyperplasia

Abstract Background Patients with severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) from giant prostatic hyperplasia (GPH): prostate volume greater than 200 mL that do not respond to medical therapy may not be eligible for surgical treatments due to morbidities, technical challenges, and patient preference...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexander S. Somwaru, Stephen Metting, Laura M. Flisnik, Michael G. Nellamattathil, Arjun Sharma, Venkat S. Katabathina
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-10-01
Series:BMC Urology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12894-020-00726-y
_version_ 1818300667624685568
author Alexander S. Somwaru
Stephen Metting
Laura M. Flisnik
Michael G. Nellamattathil
Arjun Sharma
Venkat S. Katabathina
author_facet Alexander S. Somwaru
Stephen Metting
Laura M. Flisnik
Michael G. Nellamattathil
Arjun Sharma
Venkat S. Katabathina
author_sort Alexander S. Somwaru
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Patients with severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) from giant prostatic hyperplasia (GPH): prostate volume greater than 200 mL that do not respond to medical therapy may not be eligible for surgical treatments due to morbidities, technical challenges, and patient preference. This retrospective investigation examined the long-term efficacy and safety of prostatic arterial embolization (PAE) as a treatment option for severe LUTS due to GPH in a large patient cohort. Methods Of 529 patients who underwent PAE between January 2016 and January 2020, 72 patients had severe LUTS from GPH and were retrospectively evaluated. PAE was performed with two embolic agents in sequence: 100–250 μm particles followed by 2 mm and 3 mm coils. Clinical assessment was performed with international prostate symptoms score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), peak flow rate (Qmax), post-void residual volume (PVR), and prostate specific antigen (PSA) measurements before and 12 months and 24 months after PAE. Prostate volume (PV) was measured by multiparametric magnetic resonance (MR) imaging before and 12 months and 24 months after PAE. Results Patients with severe LUTS from GPH experienced significant clinical improvements in IPSS, QoL, Qmax, PVR, PSA, and PV at 12 months and 24 months after PAE. Mean IPSS decreased from 26.5 to 18.0 (P < 0.01) to 10.5 (P < 0.01). Mean QoL decreased from 6.0 to 4.0 (P < 0.01) to 2.0 (P < 0.01). Mean Qmax increased from 8.0 to 14 mL/s (P < 0.01) to 18 mL/s (P < 0.01). Mean PVR decreased from 198.0 to 152.0 mL (P < 0.01) to 90 mL (P < 0.01). Mean PV decreased from 303.0 mL to 258.0 mL (P < 0.01) to 209.0 mL (P < 0.01). Mean PSA decreased from 11.2 ng/mL to 9.5 ng/mL (P < 0.05) to 7.9 ng/mL (P < 0.05). No major complications occurred. Conclusions PAE is a safe treatment with long term efficacy for severe LUTS from GPH. PAE may be a viable therapeutic option for patients with severe LUTS from GPH whom fail medical therapy and are not candidates for surgical treatments.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T05:10:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6a7d87151380435dbe7ba11eea63d161
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2490
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T05:10:46Z
publishDate 2020-10-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Urology
spelling doaj.art-6a7d87151380435dbe7ba11eea63d1612022-12-21T23:58:32ZengBMCBMC Urology1471-24902020-10-012011910.1186/s12894-020-00726-yProstate artery embolization has long term efficacy for treatment of severe lower urinary tract symptoms from giant prostatic hyperplasiaAlexander S. Somwaru0Stephen Metting1Laura M. Flisnik2Michael G. Nellamattathil3Arjun Sharma4Venkat S. Katabathina5Department of Diagnostic, Molecular, and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine At Mount SinaiValley Radiology Medical AssociatesDepartment of Radiology, New York Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical CenterDepartment of Radiology, MedStar Georgetown University HospitalDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Brigham and Women’s HospitalDepartment of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center San AntonioAbstract Background Patients with severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) from giant prostatic hyperplasia (GPH): prostate volume greater than 200 mL that do not respond to medical therapy may not be eligible for surgical treatments due to morbidities, technical challenges, and patient preference. This retrospective investigation examined the long-term efficacy and safety of prostatic arterial embolization (PAE) as a treatment option for severe LUTS due to GPH in a large patient cohort. Methods Of 529 patients who underwent PAE between January 2016 and January 2020, 72 patients had severe LUTS from GPH and were retrospectively evaluated. PAE was performed with two embolic agents in sequence: 100–250 μm particles followed by 2 mm and 3 mm coils. Clinical assessment was performed with international prostate symptoms score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), peak flow rate (Qmax), post-void residual volume (PVR), and prostate specific antigen (PSA) measurements before and 12 months and 24 months after PAE. Prostate volume (PV) was measured by multiparametric magnetic resonance (MR) imaging before and 12 months and 24 months after PAE. Results Patients with severe LUTS from GPH experienced significant clinical improvements in IPSS, QoL, Qmax, PVR, PSA, and PV at 12 months and 24 months after PAE. Mean IPSS decreased from 26.5 to 18.0 (P < 0.01) to 10.5 (P < 0.01). Mean QoL decreased from 6.0 to 4.0 (P < 0.01) to 2.0 (P < 0.01). Mean Qmax increased from 8.0 to 14 mL/s (P < 0.01) to 18 mL/s (P < 0.01). Mean PVR decreased from 198.0 to 152.0 mL (P < 0.01) to 90 mL (P < 0.01). Mean PV decreased from 303.0 mL to 258.0 mL (P < 0.01) to 209.0 mL (P < 0.01). Mean PSA decreased from 11.2 ng/mL to 9.5 ng/mL (P < 0.05) to 7.9 ng/mL (P < 0.05). No major complications occurred. Conclusions PAE is a safe treatment with long term efficacy for severe LUTS from GPH. PAE may be a viable therapeutic option for patients with severe LUTS from GPH whom fail medical therapy and are not candidates for surgical treatments.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12894-020-00726-yGiant prostatic hyperplasia (GPH)Prostatic artery embolization (PAE)Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)
spellingShingle Alexander S. Somwaru
Stephen Metting
Laura M. Flisnik
Michael G. Nellamattathil
Arjun Sharma
Venkat S. Katabathina
Prostate artery embolization has long term efficacy for treatment of severe lower urinary tract symptoms from giant prostatic hyperplasia
BMC Urology
Giant prostatic hyperplasia (GPH)
Prostatic artery embolization (PAE)
Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)
title Prostate artery embolization has long term efficacy for treatment of severe lower urinary tract symptoms from giant prostatic hyperplasia
title_full Prostate artery embolization has long term efficacy for treatment of severe lower urinary tract symptoms from giant prostatic hyperplasia
title_fullStr Prostate artery embolization has long term efficacy for treatment of severe lower urinary tract symptoms from giant prostatic hyperplasia
title_full_unstemmed Prostate artery embolization has long term efficacy for treatment of severe lower urinary tract symptoms from giant prostatic hyperplasia
title_short Prostate artery embolization has long term efficacy for treatment of severe lower urinary tract symptoms from giant prostatic hyperplasia
title_sort prostate artery embolization has long term efficacy for treatment of severe lower urinary tract symptoms from giant prostatic hyperplasia
topic Giant prostatic hyperplasia (GPH)
Prostatic artery embolization (PAE)
Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12894-020-00726-y
work_keys_str_mv AT alexanderssomwaru prostatearteryembolizationhaslongtermefficacyfortreatmentofseverelowerurinarytractsymptomsfromgiantprostatichyperplasia
AT stephenmetting prostatearteryembolizationhaslongtermefficacyfortreatmentofseverelowerurinarytractsymptomsfromgiantprostatichyperplasia
AT lauramflisnik prostatearteryembolizationhaslongtermefficacyfortreatmentofseverelowerurinarytractsymptomsfromgiantprostatichyperplasia
AT michaelgnellamattathil prostatearteryembolizationhaslongtermefficacyfortreatmentofseverelowerurinarytractsymptomsfromgiantprostatichyperplasia
AT arjunsharma prostatearteryembolizationhaslongtermefficacyfortreatmentofseverelowerurinarytractsymptomsfromgiantprostatichyperplasia
AT venkatskatabathina prostatearteryembolizationhaslongtermefficacyfortreatmentofseverelowerurinarytractsymptomsfromgiantprostatichyperplasia