Relationship between right ventricular pacing and non-sustained ventricular arrhythmias in patients with dual-chamber pacemaker and normal range left ventricular ejection fraction

Abstract Background Right ventricular pacing (RVP) increases heart failure, AF, and death rates in pacemaker patients and ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) in defibrillator patients. However, the impact of RVP on VAs burden and its clinical significance in pacemaker patients with normal range LVEF of &g...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rayan S. El-Zein, Anish K. Amin, Sreedhar R. Billakanty, Eugene Y. Fu, Allan J. Nichols, Steven D. Nelson, James M. Kleman, Gregory A. Kidwell, Nagesh Chopra
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-09-01
Series:International Journal of Arrhythmia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s42444-020-00022-8
_version_ 1831655931719450624
author Rayan S. El-Zein
Anish K. Amin
Sreedhar R. Billakanty
Eugene Y. Fu
Allan J. Nichols
Steven D. Nelson
James M. Kleman
Gregory A. Kidwell
Nagesh Chopra
author_facet Rayan S. El-Zein
Anish K. Amin
Sreedhar R. Billakanty
Eugene Y. Fu
Allan J. Nichols
Steven D. Nelson
James M. Kleman
Gregory A. Kidwell
Nagesh Chopra
author_sort Rayan S. El-Zein
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Right ventricular pacing (RVP) increases heart failure, AF, and death rates in pacemaker patients and ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) in defibrillator patients. However, the impact of RVP on VAs burden and its clinical significance in pacemaker patients with normal range LVEF of > 50–55% remains unknown. We sought to evaluate the relationship of RVP and VAs and its clinical impact in a pacemaker patient population. Methods Records of 105 patients who underwent de novo dual-chamber pacemaker implant or a generator change (Medtronic™ or Boston Scientific™) for AV block and sinus node disease at a tertiary care center between September 1, 2015, and September 1, 2016, were retrospectively reviewed. Results Data from 105 patients (51% females, mean age 76 ± 1 years, mean LVEF 61 ± 0.7%) without history of VAs (98.2%) were reviewed over 1044 ± 23 days. Dependent patients (100% RVP) exhibited the lowest VAs burden when compared to < 100% RVP (isolated PVCs, PVC runs of < 4 beats, and NSVT; p ≤ 0.001). Patients with < 1% RVP also exhibited low VA burden with intermediate RVP (1–99.9%) being most arrhythmogenic for PVC runs (p = 0.04) and for isolated PVCs (p = 0.006). Antiarrhythmics/beta and calcium channel blockers use and stress tests performed to evaluate VAs which were positive requiring intervention did not differ significantly. Burden of > 1/h of PVC runs and increasing PVC runs/h were significantly associated with hospitalization (p = 0.04) and all-cause mortality (p = 0.03), respectively. Conclusions In pacemaker patients with normal range LVEF (> 50–55%), 100% RVP is associated with the lowest burden of NSVT. Furthermore, patients with < 1% RVP also exhibit low VA burden; however, intermittent RVP seems to significantly correlate with non-sustained VAs.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T16:58:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6a7e57d9f0db4c06bb7bf21e8ed5d410
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2466-1171
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T16:58:16Z
publishDate 2020-09-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series International Journal of Arrhythmia
spelling doaj.art-6a7e57d9f0db4c06bb7bf21e8ed5d4102022-12-21T20:13:22ZengBMCInternational Journal of Arrhythmia2466-11712020-09-012111910.1186/s42444-020-00022-8Relationship between right ventricular pacing and non-sustained ventricular arrhythmias in patients with dual-chamber pacemaker and normal range left ventricular ejection fractionRayan S. El-Zein0Anish K. Amin1Sreedhar R. Billakanty2Eugene Y. Fu3Allan J. Nichols4Steven D. Nelson5James M. Kleman6Gregory A. Kidwell7Nagesh Chopra8Department of Internal Medicine, OhioHealth Doctors HospitalSection of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiology, OhioHealth Heart and Vascular Physicians, Riverside Methodist HospitalSection of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiology, OhioHealth Heart and Vascular Physicians, Riverside Methodist HospitalSection of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiology, OhioHealth Heart and Vascular Physicians, Riverside Methodist HospitalSection of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiology, OhioHealth Heart and Vascular Physicians, Riverside Methodist HospitalSection of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiology, OhioHealth Heart and Vascular Physicians, Riverside Methodist HospitalSection of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiology, OhioHealth Heart and Vascular Physicians, Riverside Methodist HospitalSection of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiology, OhioHealth Heart and Vascular Physicians, Riverside Methodist HospitalSection of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiology, OhioHealth Heart and Vascular Physicians, Riverside Methodist HospitalAbstract Background Right ventricular pacing (RVP) increases heart failure, AF, and death rates in pacemaker patients and ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) in defibrillator patients. However, the impact of RVP on VAs burden and its clinical significance in pacemaker patients with normal range LVEF of > 50–55% remains unknown. We sought to evaluate the relationship of RVP and VAs and its clinical impact in a pacemaker patient population. Methods Records of 105 patients who underwent de novo dual-chamber pacemaker implant or a generator change (Medtronic™ or Boston Scientific™) for AV block and sinus node disease at a tertiary care center between September 1, 2015, and September 1, 2016, were retrospectively reviewed. Results Data from 105 patients (51% females, mean age 76 ± 1 years, mean LVEF 61 ± 0.7%) without history of VAs (98.2%) were reviewed over 1044 ± 23 days. Dependent patients (100% RVP) exhibited the lowest VAs burden when compared to < 100% RVP (isolated PVCs, PVC runs of < 4 beats, and NSVT; p ≤ 0.001). Patients with < 1% RVP also exhibited low VA burden with intermediate RVP (1–99.9%) being most arrhythmogenic for PVC runs (p = 0.04) and for isolated PVCs (p = 0.006). Antiarrhythmics/beta and calcium channel blockers use and stress tests performed to evaluate VAs which were positive requiring intervention did not differ significantly. Burden of > 1/h of PVC runs and increasing PVC runs/h were significantly associated with hospitalization (p = 0.04) and all-cause mortality (p = 0.03), respectively. Conclusions In pacemaker patients with normal range LVEF (> 50–55%), 100% RVP is associated with the lowest burden of NSVT. Furthermore, patients with < 1% RVP also exhibit low VA burden; however, intermittent RVP seems to significantly correlate with non-sustained VAs.https://doi.org/10.1186/s42444-020-00022-8Right ventricular pacingNon-sustained ventricular arrhythmiasDual-chamber pacemakerPremature ventricular complex
spellingShingle Rayan S. El-Zein
Anish K. Amin
Sreedhar R. Billakanty
Eugene Y. Fu
Allan J. Nichols
Steven D. Nelson
James M. Kleman
Gregory A. Kidwell
Nagesh Chopra
Relationship between right ventricular pacing and non-sustained ventricular arrhythmias in patients with dual-chamber pacemaker and normal range left ventricular ejection fraction
International Journal of Arrhythmia
Right ventricular pacing
Non-sustained ventricular arrhythmias
Dual-chamber pacemaker
Premature ventricular complex
title Relationship between right ventricular pacing and non-sustained ventricular arrhythmias in patients with dual-chamber pacemaker and normal range left ventricular ejection fraction
title_full Relationship between right ventricular pacing and non-sustained ventricular arrhythmias in patients with dual-chamber pacemaker and normal range left ventricular ejection fraction
title_fullStr Relationship between right ventricular pacing and non-sustained ventricular arrhythmias in patients with dual-chamber pacemaker and normal range left ventricular ejection fraction
title_full_unstemmed Relationship between right ventricular pacing and non-sustained ventricular arrhythmias in patients with dual-chamber pacemaker and normal range left ventricular ejection fraction
title_short Relationship between right ventricular pacing and non-sustained ventricular arrhythmias in patients with dual-chamber pacemaker and normal range left ventricular ejection fraction
title_sort relationship between right ventricular pacing and non sustained ventricular arrhythmias in patients with dual chamber pacemaker and normal range left ventricular ejection fraction
topic Right ventricular pacing
Non-sustained ventricular arrhythmias
Dual-chamber pacemaker
Premature ventricular complex
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s42444-020-00022-8
work_keys_str_mv AT rayanselzein relationshipbetweenrightventricularpacingandnonsustainedventriculararrhythmiasinpatientswithdualchamberpacemakerandnormalrangeleftventricularejectionfraction
AT anishkamin relationshipbetweenrightventricularpacingandnonsustainedventriculararrhythmiasinpatientswithdualchamberpacemakerandnormalrangeleftventricularejectionfraction
AT sreedharrbillakanty relationshipbetweenrightventricularpacingandnonsustainedventriculararrhythmiasinpatientswithdualchamberpacemakerandnormalrangeleftventricularejectionfraction
AT eugeneyfu relationshipbetweenrightventricularpacingandnonsustainedventriculararrhythmiasinpatientswithdualchamberpacemakerandnormalrangeleftventricularejectionfraction
AT allanjnichols relationshipbetweenrightventricularpacingandnonsustainedventriculararrhythmiasinpatientswithdualchamberpacemakerandnormalrangeleftventricularejectionfraction
AT stevendnelson relationshipbetweenrightventricularpacingandnonsustainedventriculararrhythmiasinpatientswithdualchamberpacemakerandnormalrangeleftventricularejectionfraction
AT jamesmkleman relationshipbetweenrightventricularpacingandnonsustainedventriculararrhythmiasinpatientswithdualchamberpacemakerandnormalrangeleftventricularejectionfraction
AT gregoryakidwell relationshipbetweenrightventricularpacingandnonsustainedventriculararrhythmiasinpatientswithdualchamberpacemakerandnormalrangeleftventricularejectionfraction
AT nageshchopra relationshipbetweenrightventricularpacingandnonsustainedventriculararrhythmiasinpatientswithdualchamberpacemakerandnormalrangeleftventricularejectionfraction