History of ALS and the competing theories on pathogenesis: IFCN handbook chapter

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a rapidly progressive neurodegenerative disorder of the human motor system, first described in the 19th Century. The etiology of ALS appears to be multifactorial, with a complex interaction of genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors underlying the onset...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrew Eisen, Steve Vucic, Hiroshi Mitsumoto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2024-01-01
Series:Clinical Neurophysiology Practice
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467981X2300032X
_version_ 1797382853195988992
author Andrew Eisen
Steve Vucic
Hiroshi Mitsumoto
author_facet Andrew Eisen
Steve Vucic
Hiroshi Mitsumoto
author_sort Andrew Eisen
collection DOAJ
description Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a rapidly progressive neurodegenerative disorder of the human motor system, first described in the 19th Century. The etiology of ALS appears to be multifactorial, with a complex interaction of genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors underlying the onset of disease. Importantly, there are no known naturally occurring animal models, and transgenic mouse models fail to faithfully reproduce ALS as it manifests in patients. Debate as to the site of onset of ALS remain, with three competing theories proposed, including (i) the dying-forward hypothesis, whereby motor neuron degeneration is mediated by hyperexcitable corticomotoneurons via an anterograde transsynaptic excitotoxic mechanism, (ii) dying-back hypothesis, proposing the ALS begins in the peripheral nervous system with a toxic factor(s) retrogradely transported into the central nervous system and mediating upper motor neuron dysfunction, and (iii) independent hypothesis, suggesting that upper and lower motor neuron degenerated independently. Transcranial magnetic stimulation studies, along with pathological and genetic findings have supported the dying forward hypothesis theory, although the science is yet to be settled. The review provides a historical overview of ALS, discusses phenotypes and likely pathogenic mechanisms.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T21:12:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6a9761c4835c44d7b149f438d8a588ca
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2467-981X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T21:12:22Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Clinical Neurophysiology Practice
spelling doaj.art-6a9761c4835c44d7b149f438d8a588ca2023-12-22T05:33:52ZengElsevierClinical Neurophysiology Practice2467-981X2024-01-019112History of ALS and the competing theories on pathogenesis: IFCN handbook chapterAndrew Eisen0Steve Vucic1Hiroshi Mitsumoto2Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Canada; Corresponding author at: Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Canada.Director Brain and Nerve Research Center, Clinical School, University of Sydney, AustraliaWesley J. Howe Professor of Neurology, Columbia University, The Neurological Institute of New York, and New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center, United StatesAmyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a rapidly progressive neurodegenerative disorder of the human motor system, first described in the 19th Century. The etiology of ALS appears to be multifactorial, with a complex interaction of genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors underlying the onset of disease. Importantly, there are no known naturally occurring animal models, and transgenic mouse models fail to faithfully reproduce ALS as it manifests in patients. Debate as to the site of onset of ALS remain, with three competing theories proposed, including (i) the dying-forward hypothesis, whereby motor neuron degeneration is mediated by hyperexcitable corticomotoneurons via an anterograde transsynaptic excitotoxic mechanism, (ii) dying-back hypothesis, proposing the ALS begins in the peripheral nervous system with a toxic factor(s) retrogradely transported into the central nervous system and mediating upper motor neuron dysfunction, and (iii) independent hypothesis, suggesting that upper and lower motor neuron degenerated independently. Transcranial magnetic stimulation studies, along with pathological and genetic findings have supported the dying forward hypothesis theory, although the science is yet to be settled. The review provides a historical overview of ALS, discusses phenotypes and likely pathogenic mechanisms.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467981X2300032XAmyotrophic lateral sclerosisCharcotDying-forwardMotor neuron disease
spellingShingle Andrew Eisen
Steve Vucic
Hiroshi Mitsumoto
History of ALS and the competing theories on pathogenesis: IFCN handbook chapter
Clinical Neurophysiology Practice
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Charcot
Dying-forward
Motor neuron disease
title History of ALS and the competing theories on pathogenesis: IFCN handbook chapter
title_full History of ALS and the competing theories on pathogenesis: IFCN handbook chapter
title_fullStr History of ALS and the competing theories on pathogenesis: IFCN handbook chapter
title_full_unstemmed History of ALS and the competing theories on pathogenesis: IFCN handbook chapter
title_short History of ALS and the competing theories on pathogenesis: IFCN handbook chapter
title_sort history of als and the competing theories on pathogenesis ifcn handbook chapter
topic Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Charcot
Dying-forward
Motor neuron disease
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467981X2300032X
work_keys_str_mv AT andreweisen historyofalsandthecompetingtheoriesonpathogenesisifcnhandbookchapter
AT stevevucic historyofalsandthecompetingtheoriesonpathogenesisifcnhandbookchapter
AT hiroshimitsumoto historyofalsandthecompetingtheoriesonpathogenesisifcnhandbookchapter