A Critical Study: Physical Closure and the Argument for Naturalism
Great naturalist philosophers like David Armstrong, David Papineau, Jeagwon Kim, and others have argued that the best arguments for naturalism are based on Physical Causal Closure (in brief P.C). P.C that is a premise in these arguments implies that only natural/physical causes are responsible for n...
Main Author: | Nima Narimani |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Qom
2021-12-01
|
Series: | Pizhūhish/hā-yi Falsafī- Kalāmī |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://pfk.qom.ac.ir/article_2111_fa628d6d2b40378ebf1898d1349e88c3.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Fine-Tuning and the Multiverse Argument Against Naturalism
by: Rad Miksa
Published: (2024-10-01) -
Mental Causation and the Causal Completeness of Physics
by: Wilson Mendonça
Published: (2002-06-01) -
The Causal Efficacy of Consciousness
by: Matthew Owen
Published: (2020-07-01) -
Natural Law with and without God
by: Jonathan Crowe
Published: (2024-04-01) -
“God’s Acting upon the World” – A Meta-metaphysical Perspective
by: Christina Schneider
Published: (2017-07-01)