Understanding non-return after a temporary deferral from giving blood: a qualitative study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The reasons why deferral from blood donation reduces the likelihood of future return remain unclear. This aim of this study was to investigate possible reasons why deferral has such a dramatic impact on donation patterns.</p> &...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hillgrove Tessa L, Doherty Kathleen V, Moore Vivienne M
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-12-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/1063
_version_ 1811275965553180672
author Hillgrove Tessa L
Doherty Kathleen V
Moore Vivienne M
author_facet Hillgrove Tessa L
Doherty Kathleen V
Moore Vivienne M
author_sort Hillgrove Tessa L
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The reasons why deferral from blood donation reduces the likelihood of future return remain unclear. This aim of this study was to investigate possible reasons why deferral has such a dramatic impact on donation patterns.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Qualitative methods were used to explore donors’ motivations to give blood, their experiences of temporary deferral, and their intentions to return once eligible. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 23 donors in the two weeks following a temporary deferral due to a low haemoglobin concentration. The Framework approach was used to analyse data and identify themes associated with prompt return, ascertained from Blood Service records.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We found that, predominantly, individuals give blood because it represents an easy and convenient way to help others, and provides personal rewards, such as enhancing positive self-concepts and valuable knowledge about health. Deferral disrupts the habit of regular donation, and additionally, introduces an element of practical and emotional hassle to what is generally seen as an undemanding activity. Return after deferral was related to four aspects of a person and their context: an individual’s other obligations, especially parenting; whether donation arrangements were facilitated by a range of supports; the presence of a strong “blood donor” identity; and whether deferral left the donor feeling valued and appreciated.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Aspects of the deferral process need to be improved to ensure individuals feel valued, and continued attention should be given to the convenience of donation, especially for those with competing obligations.</p>
first_indexed 2024-04-12T23:48:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6ac493ac5674470e9bf730a434a5f3e7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2458
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T23:48:07Z
publishDate 2012-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Public Health
spelling doaj.art-6ac493ac5674470e9bf730a434a5f3e72022-12-22T03:11:48ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582012-12-01121106310.1186/1471-2458-12-1063Understanding non-return after a temporary deferral from giving blood: a qualitative studyHillgrove Tessa LDoherty Kathleen VMoore Vivienne M<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The reasons why deferral from blood donation reduces the likelihood of future return remain unclear. This aim of this study was to investigate possible reasons why deferral has such a dramatic impact on donation patterns.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Qualitative methods were used to explore donors’ motivations to give blood, their experiences of temporary deferral, and their intentions to return once eligible. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 23 donors in the two weeks following a temporary deferral due to a low haemoglobin concentration. The Framework approach was used to analyse data and identify themes associated with prompt return, ascertained from Blood Service records.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We found that, predominantly, individuals give blood because it represents an easy and convenient way to help others, and provides personal rewards, such as enhancing positive self-concepts and valuable knowledge about health. Deferral disrupts the habit of regular donation, and additionally, introduces an element of practical and emotional hassle to what is generally seen as an undemanding activity. Return after deferral was related to four aspects of a person and their context: an individual’s other obligations, especially parenting; whether donation arrangements were facilitated by a range of supports; the presence of a strong “blood donor” identity; and whether deferral left the donor feeling valued and appreciated.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Aspects of the deferral process need to be improved to ensure individuals feel valued, and continued attention should be given to the convenience of donation, especially for those with competing obligations.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/1063
spellingShingle Hillgrove Tessa L
Doherty Kathleen V
Moore Vivienne M
Understanding non-return after a temporary deferral from giving blood: a qualitative study
BMC Public Health
title Understanding non-return after a temporary deferral from giving blood: a qualitative study
title_full Understanding non-return after a temporary deferral from giving blood: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Understanding non-return after a temporary deferral from giving blood: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Understanding non-return after a temporary deferral from giving blood: a qualitative study
title_short Understanding non-return after a temporary deferral from giving blood: a qualitative study
title_sort understanding non return after a temporary deferral from giving blood a qualitative study
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/1063
work_keys_str_mv AT hillgrovetessal understandingnonreturnafteratemporarydeferralfromgivingbloodaqualitativestudy
AT dohertykathleenv understandingnonreturnafteratemporarydeferralfromgivingbloodaqualitativestudy
AT mooreviviennem understandingnonreturnafteratemporarydeferralfromgivingbloodaqualitativestudy