3D CULTURAL HERITAGE DOCUMENTATION: A COMPARISON BETWEEN DIFFERENT PHOTOGRAMMETRIC SOFTWARE AND THEIR PRODUCTS
The conservation of Cultural Heritage depends on the availability of means and resources and, consequently, on the possibility to make effective operations of data acquisition. In facts, on the one hand the creation of data repositories allows the description of the present state-of-art, in order to...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2018-05-01
|
| Series: | The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences |
| Online Access: | https://www.int-arch-photogramm-remote-sens-spatial-inf-sci.net/XLII-2/347/2018/isprs-archives-XLII-2-347-2018.pdf |
| _version_ | 1811335187491979264 |
|---|---|
| author | S. Gagliolo E. Ausonio B. Federici I. Ferrando D. Passoni D. Sguerso |
| author_facet | S. Gagliolo E. Ausonio B. Federici I. Ferrando D. Passoni D. Sguerso |
| author_sort | S. Gagliolo |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The conservation of Cultural Heritage depends on the availability of means and resources and, consequently, on the possibility to make effective operations of data acquisition. In facts, on the one hand the creation of data repositories allows the description of the present state-of-art, in order to preserve the testimonial value and to permit the fruition. On the other hand, data acquisition grants a metrical knowledge, which is particularly useful for a direct restoration of the surveyed objects, through the analysis of their 3D digital models. In the last decades, the continuous increase and improvement of 3D survey techniques and of tools for the geometric and digital data management have represented a great support to the development of documentary activities. In particular, Photogrammetry is a survey technique highly appropriate in the creation of data repositories in the field of Cultural Heritage, thanks to its advantages of cheapness, flexibility, speed, and the opportunity to ensure the operators’ safety in hazardous areas too. In order to obtain a complete documentation, the high precision of the on-site operations must be coupled with an effective post-processing phase. Hence, a comparison among some of the photogrammetric software currently available was performed by the authors, with a particular attention to the workflow completeness and the final products quality. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-13T17:20:27Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-6ad948cfc9d7441a8fc3970ce308e875 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1682-1750 2194-9034 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-13T17:20:27Z |
| publishDate | 2018-05-01 |
| publisher | Copernicus Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences |
| spelling | doaj.art-6ad948cfc9d7441a8fc3970ce308e8752022-12-22T02:38:00ZengCopernicus PublicationsThe International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences1682-17502194-90342018-05-01XLII-234735410.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-347-20183D CULTURAL HERITAGE DOCUMENTATION: A COMPARISON BETWEEN DIFFERENT PHOTOGRAMMETRIC SOFTWARE AND THEIR PRODUCTSS. Gagliolo0E. Ausonio1B. Federici2I. Ferrando3D. Passoni4D. Sguerso5Università degli Studi di Genova, DICCA – Laboratory of Geodesy, Geomatics and GIS, Via Montallegro 1, 16145 Genova, ItalyUniversità degli Studi di Genova, DICCA – Laboratory of Geodesy, Geomatics and GIS, Via Montallegro 1, 16145 Genova, ItalyUniversità degli Studi di Genova, DICCA – Laboratory of Geodesy, Geomatics and GIS, Via Montallegro 1, 16145 Genova, ItalyUniversità degli Studi di Genova, DICCA – Laboratory of Geodesy, Geomatics and GIS, Via Montallegro 1, 16145 Genova, ItalyUniversità degli Studi di Genova, DICCA – Laboratory of Geodesy, Geomatics and GIS, Via Montallegro 1, 16145 Genova, ItalyUniversità degli Studi di Genova, DICCA – Laboratory of Geodesy, Geomatics and GIS, Via Montallegro 1, 16145 Genova, ItalyThe conservation of Cultural Heritage depends on the availability of means and resources and, consequently, on the possibility to make effective operations of data acquisition. In facts, on the one hand the creation of data repositories allows the description of the present state-of-art, in order to preserve the testimonial value and to permit the fruition. On the other hand, data acquisition grants a metrical knowledge, which is particularly useful for a direct restoration of the surveyed objects, through the analysis of their 3D digital models. In the last decades, the continuous increase and improvement of 3D survey techniques and of tools for the geometric and digital data management have represented a great support to the development of documentary activities. In particular, Photogrammetry is a survey technique highly appropriate in the creation of data repositories in the field of Cultural Heritage, thanks to its advantages of cheapness, flexibility, speed, and the opportunity to ensure the operators’ safety in hazardous areas too. In order to obtain a complete documentation, the high precision of the on-site operations must be coupled with an effective post-processing phase. Hence, a comparison among some of the photogrammetric software currently available was performed by the authors, with a particular attention to the workflow completeness and the final products quality.https://www.int-arch-photogramm-remote-sens-spatial-inf-sci.net/XLII-2/347/2018/isprs-archives-XLII-2-347-2018.pdf |
| spellingShingle | S. Gagliolo E. Ausonio B. Federici I. Ferrando D. Passoni D. Sguerso 3D CULTURAL HERITAGE DOCUMENTATION: A COMPARISON BETWEEN DIFFERENT PHOTOGRAMMETRIC SOFTWARE AND THEIR PRODUCTS The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences |
| title | 3D CULTURAL HERITAGE DOCUMENTATION: A COMPARISON BETWEEN DIFFERENT PHOTOGRAMMETRIC SOFTWARE AND THEIR PRODUCTS |
| title_full | 3D CULTURAL HERITAGE DOCUMENTATION: A COMPARISON BETWEEN DIFFERENT PHOTOGRAMMETRIC SOFTWARE AND THEIR PRODUCTS |
| title_fullStr | 3D CULTURAL HERITAGE DOCUMENTATION: A COMPARISON BETWEEN DIFFERENT PHOTOGRAMMETRIC SOFTWARE AND THEIR PRODUCTS |
| title_full_unstemmed | 3D CULTURAL HERITAGE DOCUMENTATION: A COMPARISON BETWEEN DIFFERENT PHOTOGRAMMETRIC SOFTWARE AND THEIR PRODUCTS |
| title_short | 3D CULTURAL HERITAGE DOCUMENTATION: A COMPARISON BETWEEN DIFFERENT PHOTOGRAMMETRIC SOFTWARE AND THEIR PRODUCTS |
| title_sort | 3d cultural heritage documentation a comparison between different photogrammetric software and their products |
| url | https://www.int-arch-photogramm-remote-sens-spatial-inf-sci.net/XLII-2/347/2018/isprs-archives-XLII-2-347-2018.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sgagliolo 3dculturalheritagedocumentationacomparisonbetweendifferentphotogrammetricsoftwareandtheirproducts AT eausonio 3dculturalheritagedocumentationacomparisonbetweendifferentphotogrammetricsoftwareandtheirproducts AT bfederici 3dculturalheritagedocumentationacomparisonbetweendifferentphotogrammetricsoftwareandtheirproducts AT iferrando 3dculturalheritagedocumentationacomparisonbetweendifferentphotogrammetricsoftwareandtheirproducts AT dpassoni 3dculturalheritagedocumentationacomparisonbetweendifferentphotogrammetricsoftwareandtheirproducts AT dsguerso 3dculturalheritagedocumentationacomparisonbetweendifferentphotogrammetricsoftwareandtheirproducts |