Current status of implantable defibrillator devices in patients with left ventricular dysfunction — The first report from the online registry database
Background: The current status of the efficacy of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD. and cardiac-resynchronization therapy with implantable defibrillator (CRT-D. in patients with left ventricular dysfunction needs to be clarified. Methods and Results: From the Japanese Cardiac Device Treat...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2008-01-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Arrhythmia |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1880427608800208 |
| _version_ | 1818383921887313920 |
|---|---|
| author | Akihiko Shimizu, MD Takashi Nitta, MD Takashi Kurita, MD Katsuhiko Imai, MD Takeshi Kimura, MD Yoshinori Kobayashi, MD Kyoko Soejima, MD Shinichi Niwano, MD Shigeyuki Watanabe, MD Haruhiko Abe, MD |
| author_facet | Akihiko Shimizu, MD Takashi Nitta, MD Takashi Kurita, MD Katsuhiko Imai, MD Takeshi Kimura, MD Yoshinori Kobayashi, MD Kyoko Soejima, MD Shinichi Niwano, MD Shigeyuki Watanabe, MD Haruhiko Abe, MD |
| author_sort | Akihiko Shimizu, MD |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background: The current status of the efficacy of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD. and cardiac-resynchronization therapy with implantable defibrillator (CRT-D. in patients with left ventricular dysfunction needs to be clarified.
Methods and Results: From the Japanese Cardiac Device Treatment Registry database, a total of 1,584 patients who had an LVEF ≦ 40% and had an ICD or CRT-D were selected as subjects in this study. The difference in the clinical characteristics between the primary and secondary prevention groups and the transition of the indications for device implantation over time were examined. Primary prevention gradually increased up to about 50% in all patients. The implantations of ICD/CRT-D for primary prevention in ischemic hear disease was significantly lower than that in dilated cardiomyopathy (33% vs 51%; p < 0.0001). The number of implantations for CRT-D for primary prevention increased dramatically over a one-year period.
Conclusions: In Japan, the implantable defibrillator devices for primary prevention was significantly lower in ischemic heart disease compared with dilated cardiomyopathy. Further, an extension of the indications for ICD/CRT-D implantations has recently been occurring, especially with CRT-D devices for primary prevention. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-14T03:14:03Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-6adc2285578348e8b888ab18b29f399b |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1880-4276 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-14T03:14:03Z |
| publishDate | 2008-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Arrhythmia |
| spelling | doaj.art-6adc2285578348e8b888ab18b29f399b2022-12-21T23:19:11ZengWileyJournal of Arrhythmia1880-42762008-01-0124313314010.1016/S1880-4276(08)80020-8Current status of implantable defibrillator devices in patients with left ventricular dysfunction — The first report from the online registry databaseAkihiko Shimizu, MDTakashi Nitta, MDTakashi Kurita, MDKatsuhiko Imai, MDTakeshi Kimura, MDYoshinori Kobayashi, MDKyoko Soejima, MDShinichi Niwano, MDShigeyuki Watanabe, MDHaruhiko Abe, MDBackground: The current status of the efficacy of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD. and cardiac-resynchronization therapy with implantable defibrillator (CRT-D. in patients with left ventricular dysfunction needs to be clarified. Methods and Results: From the Japanese Cardiac Device Treatment Registry database, a total of 1,584 patients who had an LVEF ≦ 40% and had an ICD or CRT-D were selected as subjects in this study. The difference in the clinical characteristics between the primary and secondary prevention groups and the transition of the indications for device implantation over time were examined. Primary prevention gradually increased up to about 50% in all patients. The implantations of ICD/CRT-D for primary prevention in ischemic hear disease was significantly lower than that in dilated cardiomyopathy (33% vs 51%; p < 0.0001). The number of implantations for CRT-D for primary prevention increased dramatically over a one-year period. Conclusions: In Japan, the implantable defibrillator devices for primary prevention was significantly lower in ischemic heart disease compared with dilated cardiomyopathy. Further, an extension of the indications for ICD/CRT-D implantations has recently been occurring, especially with CRT-D devices for primary prevention.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1880427608800208heart failureimplantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD)cardiac resynchronization therapypreventionguidelines |
| spellingShingle | Akihiko Shimizu, MD Takashi Nitta, MD Takashi Kurita, MD Katsuhiko Imai, MD Takeshi Kimura, MD Yoshinori Kobayashi, MD Kyoko Soejima, MD Shinichi Niwano, MD Shigeyuki Watanabe, MD Haruhiko Abe, MD Current status of implantable defibrillator devices in patients with left ventricular dysfunction — The first report from the online registry database Journal of Arrhythmia heart failure implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) cardiac resynchronization therapy prevention guidelines |
| title | Current status of implantable defibrillator devices in patients with left ventricular dysfunction — The first report from the online registry database |
| title_full | Current status of implantable defibrillator devices in patients with left ventricular dysfunction — The first report from the online registry database |
| title_fullStr | Current status of implantable defibrillator devices in patients with left ventricular dysfunction — The first report from the online registry database |
| title_full_unstemmed | Current status of implantable defibrillator devices in patients with left ventricular dysfunction — The first report from the online registry database |
| title_short | Current status of implantable defibrillator devices in patients with left ventricular dysfunction — The first report from the online registry database |
| title_sort | current status of implantable defibrillator devices in patients with left ventricular dysfunction the first report from the online registry database |
| topic | heart failure implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) cardiac resynchronization therapy prevention guidelines |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1880427608800208 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT akihikoshimizumd currentstatusofimplantabledefibrillatordevicesinpatientswithleftventriculardysfunctionthefirstreportfromtheonlineregistrydatabase AT takashinittamd currentstatusofimplantabledefibrillatordevicesinpatientswithleftventriculardysfunctionthefirstreportfromtheonlineregistrydatabase AT takashikuritamd currentstatusofimplantabledefibrillatordevicesinpatientswithleftventriculardysfunctionthefirstreportfromtheonlineregistrydatabase AT katsuhikoimaimd currentstatusofimplantabledefibrillatordevicesinpatientswithleftventriculardysfunctionthefirstreportfromtheonlineregistrydatabase AT takeshikimuramd currentstatusofimplantabledefibrillatordevicesinpatientswithleftventriculardysfunctionthefirstreportfromtheonlineregistrydatabase AT yoshinorikobayashimd currentstatusofimplantabledefibrillatordevicesinpatientswithleftventriculardysfunctionthefirstreportfromtheonlineregistrydatabase AT kyokosoejimamd currentstatusofimplantabledefibrillatordevicesinpatientswithleftventriculardysfunctionthefirstreportfromtheonlineregistrydatabase AT shinichiniwanomd currentstatusofimplantabledefibrillatordevicesinpatientswithleftventriculardysfunctionthefirstreportfromtheonlineregistrydatabase AT shigeyukiwatanabemd currentstatusofimplantabledefibrillatordevicesinpatientswithleftventriculardysfunctionthefirstreportfromtheonlineregistrydatabase AT haruhikoabemd currentstatusofimplantabledefibrillatordevicesinpatientswithleftventriculardysfunctionthefirstreportfromtheonlineregistrydatabase |