Objective assessment of optical quality in dry eye disease using a double-pass imaging system

Larissa Gouvea,1 George Oral Waring IV,2 Ashley Brundrett,1,3 Michelle Crouse,4 Karolinne Maia Rocha1,3 1Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; 2Waring Vision Institute, Mount Pleasant, SC, USA; 3Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of South Caroli...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gouvea L, Waring GO IV, Brundrett A, Crouse M, Rocha KM
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2019-10-01
Series:Clinical Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/objective-assessment-of-optical-quality-in-dry-eye-disease-using-a-dou-peer-reviewed-article-OPTH
_version_ 1819021367806263296
author Gouvea L
Waring GO IV
Brundrett A
Crouse M
Rocha KM
author_facet Gouvea L
Waring GO IV
Brundrett A
Crouse M
Rocha KM
author_sort Gouvea L
collection DOAJ
description Larissa Gouvea,1 George Oral Waring IV,2 Ashley Brundrett,1,3 Michelle Crouse,4 Karolinne Maia Rocha1,3 1Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; 2Waring Vision Institute, Mount Pleasant, SC, USA; 3Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; 4Department of Internal Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USACorrespondence: Larissa GouveaStorm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, 167 Ashley Avenue, Charleston, SC 29425, USAEmail gouveaalarissa@gmail.comPurpose: To assess optical quality dynamics using a double-pass (DP) system in patients with dry eye disease (DED).Methods: Seventy-six eyes with DED and 44 control subjects were enrolled in this study. Each patient underwent ocular surface evaluation including fluorescein corneal staining and Schirmer’s II test. Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire was used to assess subjective symptoms. Optical quality dynamics and tear film instability was analyzed using a DP system (HD AnalyzerTM, Visiometrics, Spain). Mean objective scatter index (OSI), maximum and minimum OSI, difference between maximum and minimum OSI (ΔOSI) were recorded with 40 consecutive scans over 20 s.Results: The DED group had pronounced impairment of optical quality compared to the control group. Mean OSI (4.29±4.07), minimum (3.22±3.51) and maximum (5.72±4.52) OSI, ΔOSI (2.50±1.96), OSDI score (36.94±16.55), and fluorescein corneal staining (0.79±0.96) were statistically significantly higher than controls (p<0.05). Schirmer’s II test was statistically significantly lower in the DED group compared to controls (10.08±7.85, 26.41±6.75, respectively; p<0.001). Three patterns of dynamic changes of OSI were proposed: ladder (continuous increase of OSI), seesaw (instability of OSI without improvement after blinking), and plateau (steady-high OSI). The ladder group showed the highest value of maximum OSI (6.93±4.13; p=0.03) and ΔOSI (3.76±2.08; p<0.001).Conclusion: DP imaging system provides an objective measurement of the visual quality in DED. Tear film instability may be assessed by dynamic changes of OSI over 20 s. In particular, the highest OSI values were observed in the ladder pattern group.Keywords: dry eye disease, quality of vision, tear film analysis, double-pass imaging system, objective scatter index, ocular surface disease index, fluorescein corneal staining, Schirmer’s test
first_indexed 2024-12-21T04:05:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6adfeb27e236468fa457eac391086f0c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1177-5483
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T04:05:59Z
publishDate 2019-10-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series Clinical Ophthalmology
spelling doaj.art-6adfeb27e236468fa457eac391086f0c2022-12-21T19:16:36ZengDove Medical PressClinical Ophthalmology1177-54832019-10-01Volume 131991199649040Objective assessment of optical quality in dry eye disease using a double-pass imaging systemGouvea LWaring GO IVBrundrett ACrouse MRocha KMLarissa Gouvea,1 George Oral Waring IV,2 Ashley Brundrett,1,3 Michelle Crouse,4 Karolinne Maia Rocha1,3 1Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; 2Waring Vision Institute, Mount Pleasant, SC, USA; 3Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; 4Department of Internal Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USACorrespondence: Larissa GouveaStorm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, 167 Ashley Avenue, Charleston, SC 29425, USAEmail gouveaalarissa@gmail.comPurpose: To assess optical quality dynamics using a double-pass (DP) system in patients with dry eye disease (DED).Methods: Seventy-six eyes with DED and 44 control subjects were enrolled in this study. Each patient underwent ocular surface evaluation including fluorescein corneal staining and Schirmer’s II test. Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire was used to assess subjective symptoms. Optical quality dynamics and tear film instability was analyzed using a DP system (HD AnalyzerTM, Visiometrics, Spain). Mean objective scatter index (OSI), maximum and minimum OSI, difference between maximum and minimum OSI (ΔOSI) were recorded with 40 consecutive scans over 20 s.Results: The DED group had pronounced impairment of optical quality compared to the control group. Mean OSI (4.29±4.07), minimum (3.22±3.51) and maximum (5.72±4.52) OSI, ΔOSI (2.50±1.96), OSDI score (36.94±16.55), and fluorescein corneal staining (0.79±0.96) were statistically significantly higher than controls (p<0.05). Schirmer’s II test was statistically significantly lower in the DED group compared to controls (10.08±7.85, 26.41±6.75, respectively; p<0.001). Three patterns of dynamic changes of OSI were proposed: ladder (continuous increase of OSI), seesaw (instability of OSI without improvement after blinking), and plateau (steady-high OSI). The ladder group showed the highest value of maximum OSI (6.93±4.13; p=0.03) and ΔOSI (3.76±2.08; p<0.001).Conclusion: DP imaging system provides an objective measurement of the visual quality in DED. Tear film instability may be assessed by dynamic changes of OSI over 20 s. In particular, the highest OSI values were observed in the ladder pattern group.Keywords: dry eye disease, quality of vision, tear film analysis, double-pass imaging system, objective scatter index, ocular surface disease index, fluorescein corneal staining, Schirmer’s testhttps://www.dovepress.com/objective-assessment-of-optical-quality-in-dry-eye-disease-using-a-dou-peer-reviewed-article-OPTHDry eye diseasequality of visiontear film analysisdouble-pass imaging systemobjective scatter indexocular surface disease indexfluorescein corneal stainingSchirmer’s test
spellingShingle Gouvea L
Waring GO IV
Brundrett A
Crouse M
Rocha KM
Objective assessment of optical quality in dry eye disease using a double-pass imaging system
Clinical Ophthalmology
Dry eye disease
quality of vision
tear film analysis
double-pass imaging system
objective scatter index
ocular surface disease index
fluorescein corneal staining
Schirmer’s test
title Objective assessment of optical quality in dry eye disease using a double-pass imaging system
title_full Objective assessment of optical quality in dry eye disease using a double-pass imaging system
title_fullStr Objective assessment of optical quality in dry eye disease using a double-pass imaging system
title_full_unstemmed Objective assessment of optical quality in dry eye disease using a double-pass imaging system
title_short Objective assessment of optical quality in dry eye disease using a double-pass imaging system
title_sort objective assessment of optical quality in dry eye disease using a double pass imaging system
topic Dry eye disease
quality of vision
tear film analysis
double-pass imaging system
objective scatter index
ocular surface disease index
fluorescein corneal staining
Schirmer’s test
url https://www.dovepress.com/objective-assessment-of-optical-quality-in-dry-eye-disease-using-a-dou-peer-reviewed-article-OPTH
work_keys_str_mv AT gouveal objectiveassessmentofopticalqualityindryeyediseaseusingadoublepassimagingsystem
AT waringgoiv objectiveassessmentofopticalqualityindryeyediseaseusingadoublepassimagingsystem
AT brundretta objectiveassessmentofopticalqualityindryeyediseaseusingadoublepassimagingsystem
AT crousem objectiveassessmentofopticalqualityindryeyediseaseusingadoublepassimagingsystem
AT rochakm objectiveassessmentofopticalqualityindryeyediseaseusingadoublepassimagingsystem