Exhaled-Breath Testing Using an Electronic Nose during Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: An Experimental Pilot Study

The increased awareness of discrepancies between self-reporting outcome measurements and objective outcome measurements within the field of neuromodulation has accelerated the search towards more objective measurements. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether an electronic nose can differentia...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lisa Goudman, Julie Jansen, Nieke Vets, Ann De Smedt, Maarten Moens
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-06-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/13/2921
_version_ 1797528333263568896
author Lisa Goudman
Julie Jansen
Nieke Vets
Ann De Smedt
Maarten Moens
author_facet Lisa Goudman
Julie Jansen
Nieke Vets
Ann De Smedt
Maarten Moens
author_sort Lisa Goudman
collection DOAJ
description The increased awareness of discrepancies between self-reporting outcome measurements and objective outcome measurements within the field of neuromodulation has accelerated the search towards more objective measurements. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether an electronic nose can differentiate between chronic pain patients in whom Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) was activated versus deactivated. Twenty-seven patients with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS) participated in this prospective pilot study. Volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath were measured with electronic nose technology (Aeonose™) during SCS on and off states. Random forest was used with a leave-10%-out cross-validation method to determine accuracy of discriminating between SCS on and off states. Our random forest showed an accuracy of 0.56, with an area under the curve of 0.62, a sensitivity of 62% (95% CI: 41–79%) and a specificity of 50% (95% CI: 30–70%). Pain intensity scores were significantly different between both SCS states. Our findings indicate that we cannot discriminate between SCS off and on states based on exhaled breath with the Aeonose™ in patients with FBSS. In clinical practice, these findings imply that with a noninvasive electronic nose, exhaled breath cannot be used as an additional marker of the effect of neuromodulation.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T09:56:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6aee4260cbee480fa8d5d70398804079
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T09:56:44Z
publishDate 2021-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-6aee4260cbee480fa8d5d703988040792023-11-22T02:16:08ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832021-06-011013292110.3390/jcm10132921Exhaled-Breath Testing Using an Electronic Nose during Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: An Experimental Pilot StudyLisa Goudman0Julie Jansen1Nieke Vets2Ann De Smedt3Maarten Moens4Department of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, 1090 Brussels, BelgiumDepartment of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, 1090 Brussels, BelgiumDepartment of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, 1090 Brussels, BelgiumSTIMULUS Consortium (reSearch and TeachIng neuroModULation Uz bruSsel), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, 1090 Brussels, BelgiumDepartment of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, 1090 Brussels, BelgiumThe increased awareness of discrepancies between self-reporting outcome measurements and objective outcome measurements within the field of neuromodulation has accelerated the search towards more objective measurements. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether an electronic nose can differentiate between chronic pain patients in whom Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) was activated versus deactivated. Twenty-seven patients with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS) participated in this prospective pilot study. Volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath were measured with electronic nose technology (Aeonose™) during SCS on and off states. Random forest was used with a leave-10%-out cross-validation method to determine accuracy of discriminating between SCS on and off states. Our random forest showed an accuracy of 0.56, with an area under the curve of 0.62, a sensitivity of 62% (95% CI: 41–79%) and a specificity of 50% (95% CI: 30–70%). Pain intensity scores were significantly different between both SCS states. Our findings indicate that we cannot discriminate between SCS off and on states based on exhaled breath with the Aeonose™ in patients with FBSS. In clinical practice, these findings imply that with a noninvasive electronic nose, exhaled breath cannot be used as an additional marker of the effect of neuromodulation.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/13/2921volatile organic compoundsbreath testselectronic noseneuromodulationchronic pain
spellingShingle Lisa Goudman
Julie Jansen
Nieke Vets
Ann De Smedt
Maarten Moens
Exhaled-Breath Testing Using an Electronic Nose during Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: An Experimental Pilot Study
Journal of Clinical Medicine
volatile organic compounds
breath tests
electronic nose
neuromodulation
chronic pain
title Exhaled-Breath Testing Using an Electronic Nose during Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: An Experimental Pilot Study
title_full Exhaled-Breath Testing Using an Electronic Nose during Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: An Experimental Pilot Study
title_fullStr Exhaled-Breath Testing Using an Electronic Nose during Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: An Experimental Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed Exhaled-Breath Testing Using an Electronic Nose during Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: An Experimental Pilot Study
title_short Exhaled-Breath Testing Using an Electronic Nose during Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: An Experimental Pilot Study
title_sort exhaled breath testing using an electronic nose during spinal cord stimulation in patients with failed back surgery syndrome an experimental pilot study
topic volatile organic compounds
breath tests
electronic nose
neuromodulation
chronic pain
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/13/2921
work_keys_str_mv AT lisagoudman exhaledbreathtestingusinganelectronicnoseduringspinalcordstimulationinpatientswithfailedbacksurgerysyndromeanexperimentalpilotstudy
AT juliejansen exhaledbreathtestingusinganelectronicnoseduringspinalcordstimulationinpatientswithfailedbacksurgerysyndromeanexperimentalpilotstudy
AT niekevets exhaledbreathtestingusinganelectronicnoseduringspinalcordstimulationinpatientswithfailedbacksurgerysyndromeanexperimentalpilotstudy
AT anndesmedt exhaledbreathtestingusinganelectronicnoseduringspinalcordstimulationinpatientswithfailedbacksurgerysyndromeanexperimentalpilotstudy
AT maartenmoens exhaledbreathtestingusinganelectronicnoseduringspinalcordstimulationinpatientswithfailedbacksurgerysyndromeanexperimentalpilotstudy