CROSS-NATIONAL DIFFERENCES IN THE TRADE UNION MOVEMENT ON THE BASIS OF INSTITUTIONS
This study deals with an issue of collective action theory. Its question is related to the activity of trade unions. According to the literature on collective action, large organisations, such as trade unions, have problems with organising themselves. The reason for this is social and economic incen...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
University of Oradea
2017-07-01
|
| Series: | Annals of the University of Oradea: Economic Science |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2017/n1/12.pdf |
| Summary: | This study deals with an issue of collective action theory. Its question is related to the activity of trade unions. According to the literature on collective action, large organisations, such as trade unions, have problems with organising themselves. The reason for this is social and economic incentives do not work in large groups, unless they consists of several smaller groups. The hypothesis of this paper is the relationship between confederations and their affiliates plays an important role in explaining cross-national differences in trade union movement and trade union activity. Based on a study a quantitative analysis was carried out in order to explore it. The obtained result is a small contribution to the empirical literature on trade unions. The methodology included a factor analysis and k-means clustering. Two out of the selected four variables describing the relationship between confederations and the member organisations fit into the factor structure. These variables did not form an independent dimension because they were linked to other variables but their factor loadings were large and they remained in one factor. So they were not separated from each other. Based on the cluster analysis it can be stated that the resulting factors are suitable for classifying the OECD countries. Three groups of countries were identified. The first group can be characterised by relatively small importance of trade union activity compared to the other two groups. Concertation at national level is important in the other two clusters but there is a difference in the institutionalisation. Social pacts have important role in the second group of countries. Finally, corporatist states constitute the third group in which the importance of confederations is the largest. The clusters created by the factors correspond roughly to trade union models in the literature. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1222-569X 1582-5450 |