Impact of planting green on soil properties under irrigated no‐till soybean

Abstract Planting green refers to the practice of planting a row crop into an actively growing cover crop (CC) and terminating it at or after row crop planting. Planting green could have more beneficial impacts on soil properties, erosion control, nutrient cycling, weed suppression, and other soil e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Trey Stephens, Humberto Blanco‐Canqui, Stevan Knezevic, Jennifer Rees, Katja Koehler‐Cole, Amit J. Jhala
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-12-01
Series:Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.20443
_version_ 1797389614653112320
author Trey Stephens
Humberto Blanco‐Canqui
Stevan Knezevic
Jennifer Rees
Katja Koehler‐Cole
Amit J. Jhala
author_facet Trey Stephens
Humberto Blanco‐Canqui
Stevan Knezevic
Jennifer Rees
Katja Koehler‐Cole
Amit J. Jhala
author_sort Trey Stephens
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Planting green refers to the practice of planting a row crop into an actively growing cover crop (CC) and terminating it at or after row crop planting. Planting green could have more beneficial impacts on soil properties, erosion control, nutrient cycling, weed suppression, and other soil ecosystem services because it allows greater CC biomass accumulation than early‐terminated CC. The objectives of this 2‐year study were to evaluate the impact of planting green on soil properties (bulk density, wet aggregate stability, sorptivity, particulate organic matter, organic matter, nutrients, and others) and soybean (Glycine max L.) yield in an irrigated no‐till soybean system in south‐central Nebraska. Treatments were cereal rye (Secale cereale L.) CC terminated 2 weeks before planting (2WBP), CC terminated 2 weeks after planting (2WAP) soybean, and no CC. On average, CC produced 2.35 Mg ha−1 of biomass for 2WBP and 12.03 Mg ha−1 for 2WAP. Both 2WBP and 2WAP reduced N concentration by 48% (31.10 vs. 59.70 mg kg−1) but had no effect on other soil properties compared with no CC. Despite the abundant CC biomass production, terminating 2WAP had little to no effect on most soil properties in the short term (2 years). Wet aggregate stability increased as CC biomass production increased, while soil sorptivity (initial water infiltration) increased as wet aggregate stability increased. CC termination timing had inconsistent effects on soybean yield. In general, after 2 years, planting green had no effect on most soil properties or soybean yield, warranting long‐term studies on this topic.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T22:58:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6afc8e4a641243d2acf09a610e7dd185
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2639-6696
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T22:58:29Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
spelling doaj.art-6afc8e4a641243d2acf09a610e7dd1852023-12-16T02:28:30ZengWileyAgrosystems, Geosciences & Environment2639-66962023-12-0164n/an/a10.1002/agg2.20443Impact of planting green on soil properties under irrigated no‐till soybeanTrey Stephens0Humberto Blanco‐Canqui1Stevan Knezevic2Jennifer Rees3Katja Koehler‐Cole4Amit J. Jhala5Department of Agronomy and Horticulture University of Nebraska‐Lincoln Lincoln Nebraska USADepartment of Agronomy and Horticulture University of Nebraska‐Lincoln Lincoln Nebraska USADepartment of Agronomy and Horticulture University of Nebraska‐Lincoln Lincoln Nebraska USANebraska Extension York Nebraska USANebraska Extension, Eastern Nebraska Research Extension and Education Center University of Nebraska‐Lincoln Ithaca Nebraska USADepartment of Agronomy and Horticulture University of Nebraska‐Lincoln Lincoln Nebraska USAAbstract Planting green refers to the practice of planting a row crop into an actively growing cover crop (CC) and terminating it at or after row crop planting. Planting green could have more beneficial impacts on soil properties, erosion control, nutrient cycling, weed suppression, and other soil ecosystem services because it allows greater CC biomass accumulation than early‐terminated CC. The objectives of this 2‐year study were to evaluate the impact of planting green on soil properties (bulk density, wet aggregate stability, sorptivity, particulate organic matter, organic matter, nutrients, and others) and soybean (Glycine max L.) yield in an irrigated no‐till soybean system in south‐central Nebraska. Treatments were cereal rye (Secale cereale L.) CC terminated 2 weeks before planting (2WBP), CC terminated 2 weeks after planting (2WAP) soybean, and no CC. On average, CC produced 2.35 Mg ha−1 of biomass for 2WBP and 12.03 Mg ha−1 for 2WAP. Both 2WBP and 2WAP reduced N concentration by 48% (31.10 vs. 59.70 mg kg−1) but had no effect on other soil properties compared with no CC. Despite the abundant CC biomass production, terminating 2WAP had little to no effect on most soil properties in the short term (2 years). Wet aggregate stability increased as CC biomass production increased, while soil sorptivity (initial water infiltration) increased as wet aggregate stability increased. CC termination timing had inconsistent effects on soybean yield. In general, after 2 years, planting green had no effect on most soil properties or soybean yield, warranting long‐term studies on this topic.https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.20443
spellingShingle Trey Stephens
Humberto Blanco‐Canqui
Stevan Knezevic
Jennifer Rees
Katja Koehler‐Cole
Amit J. Jhala
Impact of planting green on soil properties under irrigated no‐till soybean
Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
title Impact of planting green on soil properties under irrigated no‐till soybean
title_full Impact of planting green on soil properties under irrigated no‐till soybean
title_fullStr Impact of planting green on soil properties under irrigated no‐till soybean
title_full_unstemmed Impact of planting green on soil properties under irrigated no‐till soybean
title_short Impact of planting green on soil properties under irrigated no‐till soybean
title_sort impact of planting green on soil properties under irrigated no till soybean
url https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.20443
work_keys_str_mv AT treystephens impactofplantinggreenonsoilpropertiesunderirrigatednotillsoybean
AT humbertoblancocanqui impactofplantinggreenonsoilpropertiesunderirrigatednotillsoybean
AT stevanknezevic impactofplantinggreenonsoilpropertiesunderirrigatednotillsoybean
AT jenniferrees impactofplantinggreenonsoilpropertiesunderirrigatednotillsoybean
AT katjakoehlercole impactofplantinggreenonsoilpropertiesunderirrigatednotillsoybean
AT amitjjhala impactofplantinggreenonsoilpropertiesunderirrigatednotillsoybean