The reproducibility of Johnston’s cephalometric superimposition method
A method of cephalometric superimposition, described by Johnston (1986), was evaluated to determine its reliability. Fifteen pairs of before-and after-treatment cephalograms, were measured five times, and an analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out on the measurements to check for any significan...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sciendo
1990-10-01
|
Series: | Australasian Orthodontic Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.2478/aoj-1990-0014 |
_version_ | 1827370120031240192 |
---|---|
author | Hashim Hanizah A. Godfrey Keith |
author_facet | Hashim Hanizah A. Godfrey Keith |
author_sort | Hashim Hanizah A. |
collection | DOAJ |
description | A method of cephalometric superimposition, described by Johnston (1986), was evaluated to determine its reliability. Fifteen pairs of before-and after-treatment cephalograms, were measured five times, and an analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out on the measurements to check for any significant differences between the repeated measures. The results of the analysis found Johnston’s method of cephalometric superimposition to be reliable and consistent, with lower standard deviations in the measurements found, compared to other commonly used methods. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-08T10:02:43Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-6b073be78cb6410db93ac6596ec23c1d |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2207-7480 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-08T10:02:43Z |
publishDate | 1990-10-01 |
publisher | Sciendo |
record_format | Article |
series | Australasian Orthodontic Journal |
spelling | doaj.art-6b073be78cb6410db93ac6596ec23c1d2024-01-29T08:53:15ZengSciendoAustralasian Orthodontic Journal2207-74801990-10-0111422723110.2478/aoj-1990-0014The reproducibility of Johnston’s cephalometric superimposition methodHashim Hanizah A.0Godfrey Keith11Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia2Sydney, AustraliaA method of cephalometric superimposition, described by Johnston (1986), was evaluated to determine its reliability. Fifteen pairs of before-and after-treatment cephalograms, were measured five times, and an analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out on the measurements to check for any significant differences between the repeated measures. The results of the analysis found Johnston’s method of cephalometric superimposition to be reliable and consistent, with lower standard deviations in the measurements found, compared to other commonly used methods.https://doi.org/10.2478/aoj-1990-0014cephalometric superimpositionsuperimposition errorspalatal plane |
spellingShingle | Hashim Hanizah A. Godfrey Keith The reproducibility of Johnston’s cephalometric superimposition method Australasian Orthodontic Journal cephalometric superimposition superimposition errors palatal plane |
title | The reproducibility of Johnston’s cephalometric superimposition method |
title_full | The reproducibility of Johnston’s cephalometric superimposition method |
title_fullStr | The reproducibility of Johnston’s cephalometric superimposition method |
title_full_unstemmed | The reproducibility of Johnston’s cephalometric superimposition method |
title_short | The reproducibility of Johnston’s cephalometric superimposition method |
title_sort | reproducibility of johnston s cephalometric superimposition method |
topic | cephalometric superimposition superimposition errors palatal plane |
url | https://doi.org/10.2478/aoj-1990-0014 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hashimhanizaha thereproducibilityofjohnstonscephalometricsuperimpositionmethod AT godfreykeith thereproducibilityofjohnstonscephalometricsuperimpositionmethod AT hashimhanizaha reproducibilityofjohnstonscephalometricsuperimpositionmethod AT godfreykeith reproducibilityofjohnstonscephalometricsuperimpositionmethod |