Clinical efficacy and safety analysis of different treatment options for Cervical pregnancy

AbstractObjective To compare the efficacy and safety of different treatment options for cervical pregnancy (CP).Materials and methods A total of 74 patients diagnosed with CP at Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital between January 2016 and September 2022 were retrospectively anal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Qiaoling Zhu, Yi Tang, Qi Tian, Hui Cheng, Jing Yang, Li Xiong, Wei Li, Lingzhi Zou, Wei Cheng, Xiaomei Luo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2023-12-01
Series:International Journal of Hyperthermia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/02656736.2023.2255757
_version_ 1797374222977204224
author Qiaoling Zhu
Yi Tang
Qi Tian
Hui Cheng
Jing Yang
Li Xiong
Wei Li
Lingzhi Zou
Wei Cheng
Xiaomei Luo
author_facet Qiaoling Zhu
Yi Tang
Qi Tian
Hui Cheng
Jing Yang
Li Xiong
Wei Li
Lingzhi Zou
Wei Cheng
Xiaomei Luo
author_sort Qiaoling Zhu
collection DOAJ
description AbstractObjective To compare the efficacy and safety of different treatment options for cervical pregnancy (CP).Materials and methods A total of 74 patients diagnosed with CP at Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital between January 2016 and September 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 31 were treated with uterine artery embolization (UAE) followed by hysteroscopic curettage, 34 were treated with hysteroscopic curettage alone, and nine were treated with high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) followed by hysteroscopic curettage. Medical records and pregnancy outcomes were analyzed.Results There were no significant differences in age, gravidity, parity, abortion, or preoperative hemoglobin levels among the patients in the three groups; however, significant differences in gestational age, gestational sac diameter, preoperative β-hCG, and presence of cardiac pulsation were observed (p < 0.05). After treatment, there was no conversion to laparotomy, and the uterus was preserved in all patients. Significant differences in blood loss during curettage, hospitalization costs, hospital days, menstrual recovery interval, β-hCG decline rates, retained products of conception, and intrauterine adhesions rate among the three groups were observed (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the placement of the uterine Foley balloon, effective curettage rate, pre-and postoperative hemoglobin decline, live birth rate, or proportion of subsequent pregnancies among the three groups.Conclusion Our results showed that hysteroscopic curettage, HIFU, and UAE followed by hysteroscopic curettage are safe and effective for treating patients with CP. Compared with the UAE, HIFU has the advantages of lower hospitalization costs, shorter hospital stays, and shorter menstrual recovery intervals.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T19:02:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6b1a37fc6b404c4e8871ba5a3bc83b8d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0265-6736
1464-5157
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T19:02:48Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series International Journal of Hyperthermia
spelling doaj.art-6b1a37fc6b404c4e8871ba5a3bc83b8d2023-12-28T04:15:43ZengTaylor & Francis GroupInternational Journal of Hyperthermia0265-67361464-51572023-12-0140110.1080/02656736.2023.2255757Clinical efficacy and safety analysis of different treatment options for Cervical pregnancyQiaoling Zhu0Yi Tang1Qi Tian2Hui Cheng3Jing Yang4Li Xiong5Wei Li6Lingzhi Zou7Wei Cheng8Xiaomei Luo9Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, P.R. ChinaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, P.R. ChinaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, P.R. ChinaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, P.R. ChinaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, P.R. ChinaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, P.R. ChinaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, P.R. ChinaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, P.R. ChinaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, P.R. ChinaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, P.R. ChinaAbstractObjective To compare the efficacy and safety of different treatment options for cervical pregnancy (CP).Materials and methods A total of 74 patients diagnosed with CP at Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital between January 2016 and September 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 31 were treated with uterine artery embolization (UAE) followed by hysteroscopic curettage, 34 were treated with hysteroscopic curettage alone, and nine were treated with high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) followed by hysteroscopic curettage. Medical records and pregnancy outcomes were analyzed.Results There were no significant differences in age, gravidity, parity, abortion, or preoperative hemoglobin levels among the patients in the three groups; however, significant differences in gestational age, gestational sac diameter, preoperative β-hCG, and presence of cardiac pulsation were observed (p < 0.05). After treatment, there was no conversion to laparotomy, and the uterus was preserved in all patients. Significant differences in blood loss during curettage, hospitalization costs, hospital days, menstrual recovery interval, β-hCG decline rates, retained products of conception, and intrauterine adhesions rate among the three groups were observed (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the placement of the uterine Foley balloon, effective curettage rate, pre-and postoperative hemoglobin decline, live birth rate, or proportion of subsequent pregnancies among the three groups.Conclusion Our results showed that hysteroscopic curettage, HIFU, and UAE followed by hysteroscopic curettage are safe and effective for treating patients with CP. Compared with the UAE, HIFU has the advantages of lower hospitalization costs, shorter hospital stays, and shorter menstrual recovery intervals.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/02656736.2023.2255757Cervical pregnancyhigh-intensity focused ultrasounduterine artery embolizationhysteroscopycurettage
spellingShingle Qiaoling Zhu
Yi Tang
Qi Tian
Hui Cheng
Jing Yang
Li Xiong
Wei Li
Lingzhi Zou
Wei Cheng
Xiaomei Luo
Clinical efficacy and safety analysis of different treatment options for Cervical pregnancy
International Journal of Hyperthermia
Cervical pregnancy
high-intensity focused ultrasound
uterine artery embolization
hysteroscopy
curettage
title Clinical efficacy and safety analysis of different treatment options for Cervical pregnancy
title_full Clinical efficacy and safety analysis of different treatment options for Cervical pregnancy
title_fullStr Clinical efficacy and safety analysis of different treatment options for Cervical pregnancy
title_full_unstemmed Clinical efficacy and safety analysis of different treatment options for Cervical pregnancy
title_short Clinical efficacy and safety analysis of different treatment options for Cervical pregnancy
title_sort clinical efficacy and safety analysis of different treatment options for cervical pregnancy
topic Cervical pregnancy
high-intensity focused ultrasound
uterine artery embolization
hysteroscopy
curettage
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/02656736.2023.2255757
work_keys_str_mv AT qiaolingzhu clinicalefficacyandsafetyanalysisofdifferenttreatmentoptionsforcervicalpregnancy
AT yitang clinicalefficacyandsafetyanalysisofdifferenttreatmentoptionsforcervicalpregnancy
AT qitian clinicalefficacyandsafetyanalysisofdifferenttreatmentoptionsforcervicalpregnancy
AT huicheng clinicalefficacyandsafetyanalysisofdifferenttreatmentoptionsforcervicalpregnancy
AT jingyang clinicalefficacyandsafetyanalysisofdifferenttreatmentoptionsforcervicalpregnancy
AT lixiong clinicalefficacyandsafetyanalysisofdifferenttreatmentoptionsforcervicalpregnancy
AT weili clinicalefficacyandsafetyanalysisofdifferenttreatmentoptionsforcervicalpregnancy
AT lingzhizou clinicalefficacyandsafetyanalysisofdifferenttreatmentoptionsforcervicalpregnancy
AT weicheng clinicalefficacyandsafetyanalysisofdifferenttreatmentoptionsforcervicalpregnancy
AT xiaomeiluo clinicalefficacyandsafetyanalysisofdifferenttreatmentoptionsforcervicalpregnancy