Performance Evaluation of IMERG GPM Products during Tropical Storm Imelda

Tropical Storm Imelda struck the southeast coastal regions of Texas from 17–19 September, 2019, and delivered precipitation above 500 mm over about 6000 km<sup>2</sup>. The performance of the three IMERG (Early-, Late-, and Final-run) GPM satellite-based precipitation products was evalua...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Salman Sakib, Dawit Ghebreyesus, Hatim O. Sharif
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-05-01
Series:Atmosphere
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/12/6/687
_version_ 1797532395862228992
author Salman Sakib
Dawit Ghebreyesus
Hatim O. Sharif
author_facet Salman Sakib
Dawit Ghebreyesus
Hatim O. Sharif
author_sort Salman Sakib
collection DOAJ
description Tropical Storm Imelda struck the southeast coastal regions of Texas from 17–19 September, 2019, and delivered precipitation above 500 mm over about 6000 km<sup>2</sup>. The performance of the three IMERG (Early-, Late-, and Final-run) GPM satellite-based precipitation products was evaluated against Stage-IV radar precipitation estimates. Basic and probabilistic statistical metrics, such as CC, RSME, RBIAS, POD, FAR, CSI, and PSS were employed to assess the performance of the IMERG products. The products captured the event adequately, with a fairly high POD value of 0.9. The best product (Early-run) showed an average correlation coefficient of 0.60. The algorithm used to produce the Final-run improved the quality of the data by removing systematic errors that occurred in the near-real-time products. Less than 5 mm RMSE error was experienced in over three-quarters (ranging from 73% to 76%) of the area by all three IMERG products in estimating the Tropical Storm Imelda. The Early-run product showed a much better RBIAS relatively to the Final-run product. The overall performance was poor, as areas with an acceptable range of RBIAS (i.e., between −10% and 10%) in all the three IMERG products were only 16% to 17% of the total area. Overall, the Early-run product was found to be better than Late- and Final-run.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T10:58:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6b404cdd3b9f42178f9a09b4a396d53a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-4433
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T10:58:33Z
publishDate 2021-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Atmosphere
spelling doaj.art-6b404cdd3b9f42178f9a09b4a396d53a2023-11-21T21:41:36ZengMDPI AGAtmosphere2073-44332021-05-0112668710.3390/atmos12060687Performance Evaluation of IMERG GPM Products during Tropical Storm ImeldaSalman Sakib0Dawit Ghebreyesus1Hatim O. Sharif2Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, The University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249, USADepartment of Civil & Environmental Engineering, The University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249, USADepartment of Civil & Environmental Engineering, The University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249, USATropical Storm Imelda struck the southeast coastal regions of Texas from 17–19 September, 2019, and delivered precipitation above 500 mm over about 6000 km<sup>2</sup>. The performance of the three IMERG (Early-, Late-, and Final-run) GPM satellite-based precipitation products was evaluated against Stage-IV radar precipitation estimates. Basic and probabilistic statistical metrics, such as CC, RSME, RBIAS, POD, FAR, CSI, and PSS were employed to assess the performance of the IMERG products. The products captured the event adequately, with a fairly high POD value of 0.9. The best product (Early-run) showed an average correlation coefficient of 0.60. The algorithm used to produce the Final-run improved the quality of the data by removing systematic errors that occurred in the near-real-time products. Less than 5 mm RMSE error was experienced in over three-quarters (ranging from 73% to 76%) of the area by all three IMERG products in estimating the Tropical Storm Imelda. The Early-run product showed a much better RBIAS relatively to the Final-run product. The overall performance was poor, as areas with an acceptable range of RBIAS (i.e., between −10% and 10%) in all the three IMERG products were only 16% to 17% of the total area. Overall, the Early-run product was found to be better than Late- and Final-run.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/12/6/687satellite dataGPMIMERGradarImeldarainfall estimates
spellingShingle Salman Sakib
Dawit Ghebreyesus
Hatim O. Sharif
Performance Evaluation of IMERG GPM Products during Tropical Storm Imelda
Atmosphere
satellite data
GPM
IMERG
radar
Imelda
rainfall estimates
title Performance Evaluation of IMERG GPM Products during Tropical Storm Imelda
title_full Performance Evaluation of IMERG GPM Products during Tropical Storm Imelda
title_fullStr Performance Evaluation of IMERG GPM Products during Tropical Storm Imelda
title_full_unstemmed Performance Evaluation of IMERG GPM Products during Tropical Storm Imelda
title_short Performance Evaluation of IMERG GPM Products during Tropical Storm Imelda
title_sort performance evaluation of imerg gpm products during tropical storm imelda
topic satellite data
GPM
IMERG
radar
Imelda
rainfall estimates
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/12/6/687
work_keys_str_mv AT salmansakib performanceevaluationofimerggpmproductsduringtropicalstormimelda
AT dawitghebreyesus performanceevaluationofimerggpmproductsduringtropicalstormimelda
AT hatimosharif performanceevaluationofimerggpmproductsduringtropicalstormimelda