Cash Forward Contracting versus Hedging of Fed Cattle, and the Impact of Cash Contracting on Cash Prices

This research examines cash forward contracting of fed cattle. for an individual feeder, a cash contract eliminates basis risk (as compared to a futures hedge). However, the disadvantage is that the contract price is estimated to be lower than the futures hedge price by $.28 - $.59/ cwt for steers a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Emmett W. Elam
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Western Agricultural Economics Association 1992-07-01
Series:Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/30729
_version_ 1819081400603639808
author Emmett W. Elam
author_facet Emmett W. Elam
author_sort Emmett W. Elam
collection DOAJ
description This research examines cash forward contracting of fed cattle. for an individual feeder, a cash contract eliminates basis risk (as compared to a futures hedge). However, the disadvantage is that the contract price is estimated to be lower than the futures hedge price by $.28 - $.59/ cwt for steers and $.86 - $1.64.cwt for heifers. From the industry perspective, contracting appears to have a negative impact on cash prices. An increase of 1,000 head in U.S. monthly contract cattle shipments is associated with a $.003-$.009/cwt decrease in the U.S. average cash price. The negative impact of cash contracting varies by state.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T20:00:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6b4b5bec3eb547ed9fda3d9aa5c9d601
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1068-5502
2327-8285
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T20:00:11Z
publishDate 1992-07-01
publisher Western Agricultural Economics Association
record_format Article
series Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
spelling doaj.art-6b4b5bec3eb547ed9fda3d9aa5c9d6012022-12-21T18:52:00ZengWestern Agricultural Economics AssociationJournal of Agricultural and Resource Economics1068-55022327-82851992-07-0117120521710.22004/ag.econ.3072930729Cash Forward Contracting versus Hedging of Fed Cattle, and the Impact of Cash Contracting on Cash PricesEmmett W. ElamThis research examines cash forward contracting of fed cattle. for an individual feeder, a cash contract eliminates basis risk (as compared to a futures hedge). However, the disadvantage is that the contract price is estimated to be lower than the futures hedge price by $.28 - $.59/ cwt for steers and $.86 - $1.64.cwt for heifers. From the industry perspective, contracting appears to have a negative impact on cash prices. An increase of 1,000 head in U.S. monthly contract cattle shipments is associated with a $.003-$.009/cwt decrease in the U.S. average cash price. The negative impact of cash contracting varies by state.https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/30729cash forward contractfed cattlefutures hedgerisk
spellingShingle Emmett W. Elam
Cash Forward Contracting versus Hedging of Fed Cattle, and the Impact of Cash Contracting on Cash Prices
Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
cash forward contract
fed cattle
futures hedge
risk
title Cash Forward Contracting versus Hedging of Fed Cattle, and the Impact of Cash Contracting on Cash Prices
title_full Cash Forward Contracting versus Hedging of Fed Cattle, and the Impact of Cash Contracting on Cash Prices
title_fullStr Cash Forward Contracting versus Hedging of Fed Cattle, and the Impact of Cash Contracting on Cash Prices
title_full_unstemmed Cash Forward Contracting versus Hedging of Fed Cattle, and the Impact of Cash Contracting on Cash Prices
title_short Cash Forward Contracting versus Hedging of Fed Cattle, and the Impact of Cash Contracting on Cash Prices
title_sort cash forward contracting versus hedging of fed cattle and the impact of cash contracting on cash prices
topic cash forward contract
fed cattle
futures hedge
risk
url https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/30729
work_keys_str_mv AT emmettwelam cashforwardcontractingversushedgingoffedcattleandtheimpactofcashcontractingoncashprices