Advantages of evaluating mean nuclear volume as an adjunct parameter in prostate cancer.
Efforts to improve the diagnosis, prognosis and surveillance of prostate cancer (PCa) are relevant. Gleason score (GSc) overestimation may subject individuals to unnecessary aggressive treatment. We aimed to use stereology in PCa evaluations and investigate whether mean nuclear volume (MNV) correlat...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4090007?pdf=render |
| _version_ | 1818265281663860736 |
|---|---|
| author | Eduardo Leze Clarice F E Maciel-Osorio Carlos A Mandarim-de-Lacerda |
| author_facet | Eduardo Leze Clarice F E Maciel-Osorio Carlos A Mandarim-de-Lacerda |
| author_sort | Eduardo Leze |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Efforts to improve the diagnosis, prognosis and surveillance of prostate cancer (PCa) are relevant. Gleason score (GSc) overestimation may subject individuals to unnecessary aggressive treatment. We aimed to use stereology in PCa evaluations and investigate whether mean nuclear volume (MNV) correlates with the Gleason primary pattern (Gpp) and to improve the subjective GSc to obtain an objective and reliable method without inter-observer dissension.We identified 74 radical prostatectomy specimens that were divided into six groups based on Gpp, from 3 to 5. Controls (C) were designed in paired non-tumor regions of the same specimens. MNV was estimated using the "point-sampled intercepts" method. Differences in MNV among the C groups and the Gpp groups were tested with the Kruskall-Wallis test and Dunn post-hoc test. Differences between each Gpp group and its control counterpart were tested with the Wilcoxon test. Correlations were evaluated with the Spearman rank correlation (R[Spearman]).The correlations between prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and GSc (R[Spearman] of 0.76) and between PSA and MNV (R[Spearman] of 0.78) were moderately strong and highly significant, and the correlation between MNV and Gpp (R[Spearman] of 0.53) was moderate and highly significant. MNV was significantly greater in cancerous regions than in paired-control regions. Limitations included sample size.Proper planning of a study, as well as the availability of equipment and software for morphological quantification, can provide incentive to quickly and accurately estimate MNV as an adjunct parameter in the assessment of PCa. Current data are in favor of the use of MNV associated with GSc and PSA in the assessment of PCa. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-12T19:48:19Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-6b53c7831919425db6fe10a210c03357 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-12T19:48:19Z |
| publishDate | 2014-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-6b53c7831919425db6fe10a210c033572022-12-22T00:14:02ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0197e10215610.1371/journal.pone.0102156Advantages of evaluating mean nuclear volume as an adjunct parameter in prostate cancer.Eduardo LezeClarice F E Maciel-OsorioCarlos A Mandarim-de-LacerdaEfforts to improve the diagnosis, prognosis and surveillance of prostate cancer (PCa) are relevant. Gleason score (GSc) overestimation may subject individuals to unnecessary aggressive treatment. We aimed to use stereology in PCa evaluations and investigate whether mean nuclear volume (MNV) correlates with the Gleason primary pattern (Gpp) and to improve the subjective GSc to obtain an objective and reliable method without inter-observer dissension.We identified 74 radical prostatectomy specimens that were divided into six groups based on Gpp, from 3 to 5. Controls (C) were designed in paired non-tumor regions of the same specimens. MNV was estimated using the "point-sampled intercepts" method. Differences in MNV among the C groups and the Gpp groups were tested with the Kruskall-Wallis test and Dunn post-hoc test. Differences between each Gpp group and its control counterpart were tested with the Wilcoxon test. Correlations were evaluated with the Spearman rank correlation (R[Spearman]).The correlations between prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and GSc (R[Spearman] of 0.76) and between PSA and MNV (R[Spearman] of 0.78) were moderately strong and highly significant, and the correlation between MNV and Gpp (R[Spearman] of 0.53) was moderate and highly significant. MNV was significantly greater in cancerous regions than in paired-control regions. Limitations included sample size.Proper planning of a study, as well as the availability of equipment and software for morphological quantification, can provide incentive to quickly and accurately estimate MNV as an adjunct parameter in the assessment of PCa. Current data are in favor of the use of MNV associated with GSc and PSA in the assessment of PCa.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4090007?pdf=render |
| spellingShingle | Eduardo Leze Clarice F E Maciel-Osorio Carlos A Mandarim-de-Lacerda Advantages of evaluating mean nuclear volume as an adjunct parameter in prostate cancer. PLoS ONE |
| title | Advantages of evaluating mean nuclear volume as an adjunct parameter in prostate cancer. |
| title_full | Advantages of evaluating mean nuclear volume as an adjunct parameter in prostate cancer. |
| title_fullStr | Advantages of evaluating mean nuclear volume as an adjunct parameter in prostate cancer. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Advantages of evaluating mean nuclear volume as an adjunct parameter in prostate cancer. |
| title_short | Advantages of evaluating mean nuclear volume as an adjunct parameter in prostate cancer. |
| title_sort | advantages of evaluating mean nuclear volume as an adjunct parameter in prostate cancer |
| url | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4090007?pdf=render |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT eduardoleze advantagesofevaluatingmeannuclearvolumeasanadjunctparameterinprostatecancer AT claricefemacielosorio advantagesofevaluatingmeannuclearvolumeasanadjunctparameterinprostatecancer AT carlosamandarimdelacerda advantagesofevaluatingmeannuclearvolumeasanadjunctparameterinprostatecancer |