| Summary: | There is a development trend from qualitative towards quantitative analysis for tunnel stability. The widely accepted convergence-confinement method (CCM) provides a quantitative framework for tunnel stability analysis, while the conventional CCM based on closed-form functions is essentially an ideal model without considering the tunnel section shape and rock weight in plastic zone. Herein, based on the CCM framework, a quantitative analysis procedure formulated through numerical simulations for more practical situations was systematically proposed to calculate the safety factor of spray-anchor support system in non-circular tunnel. Besides, similarities and differences between the most widely used Hoek-Brown (HB) and equivalent Mohr-Coulomb (EMC) criteria were considered for practical reference. The proposed method was utilized to conduct quantitative analysis of LDPs, mechanical responses of surrounding rock and safety factors for four typical tunnels, and the consistency between tunnels based on HB criterion (TBHBC) and EMC criterion (TBEMCC) was analyzed. The results indicated that the maximum radial convergence of LDP, plastic zone area, and safety factor of TBEMCC were 34.54%, 37.29%, and 47.71% lower than those of TBHBC respectively. The reasons for differences between results were revealed. The spatial effect induced by the face excavation of TBEMCC was weakened as compared to TBHBC, leading to a drop of LDP. Consequently, the safety factor was underestimated. The method systematically provided an effective tool for quantitative stability analysis and design optimization of support system for an underground excavation.
|
|---|