Role of fetal surgery in spinal dysraphism

Open spinal dysraphism is a common and clinically challenging organo-genetic malformation. Due to the well-known multi-organ affection with significant implication on the lives of patients and their families, abortion after prenatal diagnosis became reality in most parts of the world. After publicat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: A. Martina Messing-Jünger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2013-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Neurosurgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.4103/2277-9167.110205
_version_ 1818578413033619456
author A. Martina Messing-Jünger
author_facet A. Martina Messing-Jünger
author_sort A. Martina Messing-Jünger
collection DOAJ
description Open spinal dysraphism is a common and clinically challenging organo-genetic malformation. Due to the well-known multi-organ affection with significant implication on the lives of patients and their families, abortion after prenatal diagnosis became reality in most parts of the world. After publication of the Management of Myelomeningocele Study (MOMS) results fetal surgery seems to be a new option and a broad discussion arose regarding advantages and risks of in utero treatment of spina bifida. This paper tries to evaluate objectively the actual state of knowledge and experience. This review article gives a historical overview as well as the experimental and pathophysiological background of fetal surgery in open spinal dysraphism. Additionally clinical follow-up experience of foetoscopically treated patients are presented and discussed. After carefully outweighing all available information on fetal surgery for spina bifida, one has to conclude, in accordance with the MOMS investigators, that in utero surgery cannot be considered a standard option at present time. But there is clear evidence of the hypothesis that early closure of the spinal canal has a positive influence on spinal cord function and severity of Chiari malformation type II, has been proven. A persisting problem is the fetal risk of prematurity and the maternal risk of uterus damage. There is also evidence that due to technical restrictions, fetal closure of the spinal canal bears unsolved problems leading to a higher postnatal incidence of complication surgery. Finally, missing long-term results make a definite evaluation impossible so far. At the moment, fetal surgery in open spinal dysraphism is not a standard of care despite promising results regarding central nervous system protection due to early spinal canal closure. Many technical problems need to be solved in the future in order to make this option a safe and standard one.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T06:45:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6b57d3f83d08467eac92387100ded897
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2277-954X
2277-9167
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T06:45:24Z
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Neurosurgery
spelling doaj.art-6b57d3f83d08467eac92387100ded8972022-12-21T22:40:33ZengThieme Medical Publishers, Inc.Indian Journal of Neurosurgery2277-954X2277-91672013-01-01020100400810.4103/2277-9167.110205Role of fetal surgery in spinal dysraphismA. Martina Messing-JüngerOpen spinal dysraphism is a common and clinically challenging organo-genetic malformation. Due to the well-known multi-organ affection with significant implication on the lives of patients and their families, abortion after prenatal diagnosis became reality in most parts of the world. After publication of the Management of Myelomeningocele Study (MOMS) results fetal surgery seems to be a new option and a broad discussion arose regarding advantages and risks of in utero treatment of spina bifida. This paper tries to evaluate objectively the actual state of knowledge and experience. This review article gives a historical overview as well as the experimental and pathophysiological background of fetal surgery in open spinal dysraphism. Additionally clinical follow-up experience of foetoscopically treated patients are presented and discussed. After carefully outweighing all available information on fetal surgery for spina bifida, one has to conclude, in accordance with the MOMS investigators, that in utero surgery cannot be considered a standard option at present time. But there is clear evidence of the hypothesis that early closure of the spinal canal has a positive influence on spinal cord function and severity of Chiari malformation type II, has been proven. A persisting problem is the fetal risk of prematurity and the maternal risk of uterus damage. There is also evidence that due to technical restrictions, fetal closure of the spinal canal bears unsolved problems leading to a higher postnatal incidence of complication surgery. Finally, missing long-term results make a definite evaluation impossible so far. At the moment, fetal surgery in open spinal dysraphism is not a standard of care despite promising results regarding central nervous system protection due to early spinal canal closure. Many technical problems need to be solved in the future in order to make this option a safe and standard one.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.4103/2277-9167.110205fetal surgerymyelomeningoceleopen spinal dysraphism
spellingShingle A. Martina Messing-Jünger
Role of fetal surgery in spinal dysraphism
Indian Journal of Neurosurgery
fetal surgery
myelomeningocele
open spinal dysraphism
title Role of fetal surgery in spinal dysraphism
title_full Role of fetal surgery in spinal dysraphism
title_fullStr Role of fetal surgery in spinal dysraphism
title_full_unstemmed Role of fetal surgery in spinal dysraphism
title_short Role of fetal surgery in spinal dysraphism
title_sort role of fetal surgery in spinal dysraphism
topic fetal surgery
myelomeningocele
open spinal dysraphism
url http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.4103/2277-9167.110205
work_keys_str_mv AT amartinamessingjunger roleoffetalsurgeryinspinaldysraphism