Comparison sealing ability in three bioceramic sealers applied in hydraulic condensation technique by using micro-computed tomography

Background/purpose: Sealing ability in root canal obturation has always been a key concern for endodontic success. The purpose of this study was to analyze the percentage of voids in root canal space obturated by using single cone hydraulic condensation with different root canal sealers and to compa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ping-Hung Lin, Dan-Jae Lin, Heng-Li Huang, Jui-Ting Hsu, Ming-Gene Tu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-07-01
Series:Journal of Dental Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1991790223000569
_version_ 1797808408135467008
author Ping-Hung Lin
Dan-Jae Lin
Heng-Li Huang
Jui-Ting Hsu
Ming-Gene Tu
author_facet Ping-Hung Lin
Dan-Jae Lin
Heng-Li Huang
Jui-Ting Hsu
Ming-Gene Tu
author_sort Ping-Hung Lin
collection DOAJ
description Background/purpose: Sealing ability in root canal obturation has always been a key concern for endodontic success. The purpose of this study was to analyze the percentage of voids in root canal space obturated by using single cone hydraulic condensation with different root canal sealers and to compare those with AH Plus sealer. Materials and methods: Experiments were conducted using twenty 3D-printed upper first premolars. After the buccal root canals were prepared using Ni–Ti rotary instruments, the teeth were divided into four groups: the AH Plus, BC sealer, BC sealer HiFlow, and Endoseal MTA groups. All buccal canals were obturated by single-cone hydraulic condensation. All specimens were scanned using micro-computed tomography and the percentage volume of the voids inside and outside the filled materials (Vin and Vout) at three different canal depth intervals were calculated by a Bruker micro-CT software. Differences according to root canal sealers were evaluated statistically using the Kruskal–Wallis test and the Wilcoxon Rank Sum test at a significance level of 0.05. Results: The results indicated that most of the voids were presented near the interface (Vout), the Vin is very small and not significant different between groups. The Vout decreased in the following order: AH Plus(1.837% ± 1.226%)≅BC sealer (1.225% ± 0.836%)>BC sealer Hiflow(0.349% ± 0.071%)>Endoseal MTA(0.203% ± 0.049%) Conclusion: For the percentage volume of voids between the root canal filling material and root canal surface, though the BC sealer Hiflow is slightly larger than Endoseal MTA, which is still much less than BC sealer and AH Plus.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T06:37:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6b58b09524724110aaec092237f757fb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1991-7902
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T06:37:00Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of Dental Sciences
spelling doaj.art-6b58b09524724110aaec092237f757fb2023-06-09T04:27:35ZengElsevierJournal of Dental Sciences1991-79022023-07-0118312581263Comparison sealing ability in three bioceramic sealers applied in hydraulic condensation technique by using micro-computed tomographyPing-Hung Lin0Dan-Jae Lin1Heng-Li Huang2Jui-Ting Hsu3Ming-Gene Tu4School of Dentistry, China Medical University, Taichung, TaiwanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, China Medical University, Taichung, TaiwanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan; Department of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, Asia University. Taichung, TaiwanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan; Department of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, Asia University. Taichung, Taiwan; Corresponding author. Department of Biomedical Engineering, China Medical University, 91 Hsueh-Shih Road, Taichung 40402, Taiwan.School of Dentistry, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan; Department of Dentistry, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan; Corresponding author. School of Dentistry, China Medical University, 91 Hsueh-Shih Road, Taichung 40402, Taiwan.Background/purpose: Sealing ability in root canal obturation has always been a key concern for endodontic success. The purpose of this study was to analyze the percentage of voids in root canal space obturated by using single cone hydraulic condensation with different root canal sealers and to compare those with AH Plus sealer. Materials and methods: Experiments were conducted using twenty 3D-printed upper first premolars. After the buccal root canals were prepared using Ni–Ti rotary instruments, the teeth were divided into four groups: the AH Plus, BC sealer, BC sealer HiFlow, and Endoseal MTA groups. All buccal canals were obturated by single-cone hydraulic condensation. All specimens were scanned using micro-computed tomography and the percentage volume of the voids inside and outside the filled materials (Vin and Vout) at three different canal depth intervals were calculated by a Bruker micro-CT software. Differences according to root canal sealers were evaluated statistically using the Kruskal–Wallis test and the Wilcoxon Rank Sum test at a significance level of 0.05. Results: The results indicated that most of the voids were presented near the interface (Vout), the Vin is very small and not significant different between groups. The Vout decreased in the following order: AH Plus(1.837% ± 1.226%)≅BC sealer (1.225% ± 0.836%)>BC sealer Hiflow(0.349% ± 0.071%)>Endoseal MTA(0.203% ± 0.049%) Conclusion: For the percentage volume of voids between the root canal filling material and root canal surface, though the BC sealer Hiflow is slightly larger than Endoseal MTA, which is still much less than BC sealer and AH Plus.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1991790223000569Bioceramic sealerHydraulic condensationMicro-computed tomographySealing ability
spellingShingle Ping-Hung Lin
Dan-Jae Lin
Heng-Li Huang
Jui-Ting Hsu
Ming-Gene Tu
Comparison sealing ability in three bioceramic sealers applied in hydraulic condensation technique by using micro-computed tomography
Journal of Dental Sciences
Bioceramic sealer
Hydraulic condensation
Micro-computed tomography
Sealing ability
title Comparison sealing ability in three bioceramic sealers applied in hydraulic condensation technique by using micro-computed tomography
title_full Comparison sealing ability in three bioceramic sealers applied in hydraulic condensation technique by using micro-computed tomography
title_fullStr Comparison sealing ability in three bioceramic sealers applied in hydraulic condensation technique by using micro-computed tomography
title_full_unstemmed Comparison sealing ability in three bioceramic sealers applied in hydraulic condensation technique by using micro-computed tomography
title_short Comparison sealing ability in three bioceramic sealers applied in hydraulic condensation technique by using micro-computed tomography
title_sort comparison sealing ability in three bioceramic sealers applied in hydraulic condensation technique by using micro computed tomography
topic Bioceramic sealer
Hydraulic condensation
Micro-computed tomography
Sealing ability
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1991790223000569
work_keys_str_mv AT pinghunglin comparisonsealingabilityinthreebioceramicsealersappliedinhydrauliccondensationtechniquebyusingmicrocomputedtomography
AT danjaelin comparisonsealingabilityinthreebioceramicsealersappliedinhydrauliccondensationtechniquebyusingmicrocomputedtomography
AT henglihuang comparisonsealingabilityinthreebioceramicsealersappliedinhydrauliccondensationtechniquebyusingmicrocomputedtomography
AT juitinghsu comparisonsealingabilityinthreebioceramicsealersappliedinhydrauliccondensationtechniquebyusingmicrocomputedtomography
AT minggenetu comparisonsealingabilityinthreebioceramicsealersappliedinhydrauliccondensationtechniquebyusingmicrocomputedtomography