An MAGDM method for design concept evaluation based on incomplete information

Design concept evaluation is a huge challenge in the R&D stage of new product development. The information in the assessments often depends on the decision-makers’ individual preferences. However, sometimes the decision-makers cannot give precise and complete information because it is very diffi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhe Chen, Zhao Pan, Qing Ma, Tingting Hou, Peng Zhao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2022-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9683631/?tool=EBI
_version_ 1811321978120830976
author Zhe Chen
Zhao Pan
Qing Ma
Tingting Hou
Peng Zhao
author_facet Zhe Chen
Zhao Pan
Qing Ma
Tingting Hou
Peng Zhao
author_sort Zhe Chen
collection DOAJ
description Design concept evaluation is a huge challenge in the R&D stage of new product development. The information in the assessments often depends on the decision-makers’ individual preferences. However, sometimes the decision-makers cannot give precise and complete information because it is very difficult for them to be familiar with all the criteria. In this situation, an incomplete information decision-making matrix is established. In this paper, decision-making methods based on incomplete information are compared in the literature review. Incomplete information determination method using trust mechanism is proved as a proper way to solve this problem, and the missing information are computed based on the alternatives However, in design concept evaluation, experts commonly provide their preferences using linguistic words according to the different attributes. Hence, we propose a three-step Multiple Attributes Group Decision-making (MAGDM) method where the missing value are determined by attributes. In step one, a data repairing method is proposed based on trust theory. After that, in step two, a comprehensive weight determination method combining AHP and entropy is proposed to obtain the weight of index attributes. Finally, the Rough-TOPSIS method is applied in the design scheme ranking step. In the case study, the proposed method is implemented in a tourism product design process to show its effectiveness.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T13:27:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6b5b1dfae5df4a97b376ad8995dacc0f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T13:27:03Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-6b5b1dfae5df4a97b376ad8995dacc0f2022-12-22T02:45:04ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032022-01-011711An MAGDM method for design concept evaluation based on incomplete informationZhe ChenZhao PanQing MaTingting HouPeng ZhaoDesign concept evaluation is a huge challenge in the R&D stage of new product development. The information in the assessments often depends on the decision-makers’ individual preferences. However, sometimes the decision-makers cannot give precise and complete information because it is very difficult for them to be familiar with all the criteria. In this situation, an incomplete information decision-making matrix is established. In this paper, decision-making methods based on incomplete information are compared in the literature review. Incomplete information determination method using trust mechanism is proved as a proper way to solve this problem, and the missing information are computed based on the alternatives However, in design concept evaluation, experts commonly provide their preferences using linguistic words according to the different attributes. Hence, we propose a three-step Multiple Attributes Group Decision-making (MAGDM) method where the missing value are determined by attributes. In step one, a data repairing method is proposed based on trust theory. After that, in step two, a comprehensive weight determination method combining AHP and entropy is proposed to obtain the weight of index attributes. Finally, the Rough-TOPSIS method is applied in the design scheme ranking step. In the case study, the proposed method is implemented in a tourism product design process to show its effectiveness.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9683631/?tool=EBI
spellingShingle Zhe Chen
Zhao Pan
Qing Ma
Tingting Hou
Peng Zhao
An MAGDM method for design concept evaluation based on incomplete information
PLoS ONE
title An MAGDM method for design concept evaluation based on incomplete information
title_full An MAGDM method for design concept evaluation based on incomplete information
title_fullStr An MAGDM method for design concept evaluation based on incomplete information
title_full_unstemmed An MAGDM method for design concept evaluation based on incomplete information
title_short An MAGDM method for design concept evaluation based on incomplete information
title_sort magdm method for design concept evaluation based on incomplete information
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9683631/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT zhechen anmagdmmethodfordesignconceptevaluationbasedonincompleteinformation
AT zhaopan anmagdmmethodfordesignconceptevaluationbasedonincompleteinformation
AT qingma anmagdmmethodfordesignconceptevaluationbasedonincompleteinformation
AT tingtinghou anmagdmmethodfordesignconceptevaluationbasedonincompleteinformation
AT pengzhao anmagdmmethodfordesignconceptevaluationbasedonincompleteinformation
AT zhechen magdmmethodfordesignconceptevaluationbasedonincompleteinformation
AT zhaopan magdmmethodfordesignconceptevaluationbasedonincompleteinformation
AT qingma magdmmethodfordesignconceptevaluationbasedonincompleteinformation
AT tingtinghou magdmmethodfordesignconceptevaluationbasedonincompleteinformation
AT pengzhao magdmmethodfordesignconceptevaluationbasedonincompleteinformation