From Observable Behaviors to Structures of Interaction in Binary Games of Strategic Complements

Consider a setting in which agents can take one of two ordered actions and in which the incentive to take the high action increases in the number of other agents taking it. Furthermore, assume that we do not know anything else about the game being played. What can we say about the details of the int...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tomás Rodríguez Barraquer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2013-10-01
Series:Entropy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/15/11/4648
_version_ 1811184529946181632
author Tomás Rodríguez Barraquer
author_facet Tomás Rodríguez Barraquer
author_sort Tomás Rodríguez Barraquer
collection DOAJ
description Consider a setting in which agents can take one of two ordered actions and in which the incentive to take the high action increases in the number of other agents taking it. Furthermore, assume that we do not know anything else about the game being played. What can we say about the details of the interaction between actions and incentives when we observe a set or a subset of all possible equilibria? In this paper, we study this question by exploring three nested classes of games: (a) binary games of strategic complements; (b) games in (a) that admit a network representation; and (c) games in (b) in which the network is complete. Our main results are the following: It has long been established in the literature that the set of pure strategy Nash equilibria of any binary game of strategic complements among a set, N, of agents can be seen as a lattice on the set of all subsets of N under the partial order defined by the set inclusion relation (C). If the game happens to be strict in the sense that agents are never indifferent among outcomes (games in (a)), then the resulting lattice of equilibria satisfies a straightforward sparseness condition. (1) We show that, in fact, for each such lattice, L, there is a game in (a), such that its set of equilibria is L (we say that such a game expresses L); (2) We show that there exists a game in (b), whose set of equilibria contains a given collection, C, of subsets of N, if and only C satisfies the sparseness condition, and the smallest game in (a) expressing C is trade robust; (3) We show that there exists a game on the complete graph (games in (c)), whose set of equilibria coincides with some collection, C, if and only if C is a chain satisfying the sparseness condition.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T13:14:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6b5f2935d02c40d69a33ffa4a5552667
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1099-4300
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T13:14:46Z
publishDate 2013-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Entropy
spelling doaj.art-6b5f2935d02c40d69a33ffa4a55526672022-12-22T04:22:27ZengMDPI AGEntropy1099-43002013-10-0115114648466710.3390/e15114648From Observable Behaviors to Structures of Interaction in Binary Games of Strategic ComplementsTomás Rodríguez BarraquerConsider a setting in which agents can take one of two ordered actions and in which the incentive to take the high action increases in the number of other agents taking it. Furthermore, assume that we do not know anything else about the game being played. What can we say about the details of the interaction between actions and incentives when we observe a set or a subset of all possible equilibria? In this paper, we study this question by exploring three nested classes of games: (a) binary games of strategic complements; (b) games in (a) that admit a network representation; and (c) games in (b) in which the network is complete. Our main results are the following: It has long been established in the literature that the set of pure strategy Nash equilibria of any binary game of strategic complements among a set, N, of agents can be seen as a lattice on the set of all subsets of N under the partial order defined by the set inclusion relation (C). If the game happens to be strict in the sense that agents are never indifferent among outcomes (games in (a)), then the resulting lattice of equilibria satisfies a straightforward sparseness condition. (1) We show that, in fact, for each such lattice, L, there is a game in (a), such that its set of equilibria is L (we say that such a game expresses L); (2) We show that there exists a game in (b), whose set of equilibria contains a given collection, C, of subsets of N, if and only C satisfies the sparseness condition, and the smallest game in (a) expressing C is trade robust; (3) We show that there exists a game on the complete graph (games in (c)), whose set of equilibria coincides with some collection, C, if and only if C is a chain satisfying the sparseness condition.http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/15/11/4648peer effectssocial networksstrategic complementssimple gamesweighted games
spellingShingle Tomás Rodríguez Barraquer
From Observable Behaviors to Structures of Interaction in Binary Games of Strategic Complements
Entropy
peer effects
social networks
strategic complements
simple games
weighted games
title From Observable Behaviors to Structures of Interaction in Binary Games of Strategic Complements
title_full From Observable Behaviors to Structures of Interaction in Binary Games of Strategic Complements
title_fullStr From Observable Behaviors to Structures of Interaction in Binary Games of Strategic Complements
title_full_unstemmed From Observable Behaviors to Structures of Interaction in Binary Games of Strategic Complements
title_short From Observable Behaviors to Structures of Interaction in Binary Games of Strategic Complements
title_sort from observable behaviors to structures of interaction in binary games of strategic complements
topic peer effects
social networks
strategic complements
simple games
weighted games
url http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/15/11/4648
work_keys_str_mv AT tomasrodriguezbarraquer fromobservablebehaviorstostructuresofinteractioninbinarygamesofstrategiccomplements