Current evidence of robotic-assisted surgery use in functional reconstructive and neuro-urology
The use of robot-assisted technology has been widely adopted in urological oncological surgery and its benefits have been well established. In recent years, robotic technology has also been used in several functional reconstructive and neuro-urology (FRNU) procedures. The aim of this review was to e...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2023-12-01
|
| Series: | Therapeutic Advances in Urology |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/17562872231213727 |
| _version_ | 1797405175815602176 |
|---|---|
| author | Hermione Tsoi Sameh F. Elnasharty Mehmet Gokhan Culha Sabrina De Cillis Cyrille Guillot-Tantay François Hervé Tanja Hüesch Nicholas Raison Véronique Phé Nadir I. Osman |
| author_facet | Hermione Tsoi Sameh F. Elnasharty Mehmet Gokhan Culha Sabrina De Cillis Cyrille Guillot-Tantay François Hervé Tanja Hüesch Nicholas Raison Véronique Phé Nadir I. Osman |
| author_sort | Hermione Tsoi |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The use of robot-assisted technology has been widely adopted in urological oncological surgery and its benefits have been well established. In recent years, robotic technology has also been used in several functional reconstructive and neuro-urology (FRNU) procedures. The aim of this review was to evaluate the current evidence in the use of robotic technology in the field of FRNU. We performed a PubMed-based literature search between July and August 2022. The keywords we included were ‘robotic assisted’, ‘ureteric reimplantation’, ‘cystoplasty’, ‘ileal conduit’, ‘neobladder’, ‘sacrocolpopexy’, ‘colposuspension’, ‘artificial urinary sphincter’, ‘genitourinary fistula’ and ‘posterior urethral stenoses’. We identified the latest available evidence in the use of robotic technology in specific FRNU procedures such as the reconstruction of the ureters, bladder and urinary sphincter, urinary diversion, and repair of genitourinary prolapse and fistula. We found that there is a lack of prospective studies to assess the robotic-assisted approach in the field of FRNU. Despite this, the advantages that robotic technology can bring to the field of FRNU are evident, including better ergonomics and visual field, less blood loss and shorter hospital stays. There is therefore a need for further prospective studies with larger patient numbers and longer follow-up periods to establish the reproducibility of these results and the long-term efficacy of the procedures, as well as the impact on patient outcomes. Common index procedures and a standardized approach to these procedures should be identified to enhance training. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-09T03:05:58Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-6b643fe51f9343de82f5d74043f66c73 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1756-2880 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-09T03:05:58Z |
| publishDate | 2023-12-01 |
| publisher | SAGE Publishing |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Therapeutic Advances in Urology |
| spelling | doaj.art-6b643fe51f9343de82f5d74043f66c732023-12-04T07:33:19ZengSAGE PublishingTherapeutic Advances in Urology1756-28802023-12-011510.1177/17562872231213727Current evidence of robotic-assisted surgery use in functional reconstructive and neuro-urologyHermione TsoiSameh F. ElnashartyMehmet Gokhan CulhaSabrina De CillisCyrille Guillot-TantayFrançois HervéTanja HüeschNicholas RaisonVéronique PhéNadir I. OsmanThe use of robot-assisted technology has been widely adopted in urological oncological surgery and its benefits have been well established. In recent years, robotic technology has also been used in several functional reconstructive and neuro-urology (FRNU) procedures. The aim of this review was to evaluate the current evidence in the use of robotic technology in the field of FRNU. We performed a PubMed-based literature search between July and August 2022. The keywords we included were ‘robotic assisted’, ‘ureteric reimplantation’, ‘cystoplasty’, ‘ileal conduit’, ‘neobladder’, ‘sacrocolpopexy’, ‘colposuspension’, ‘artificial urinary sphincter’, ‘genitourinary fistula’ and ‘posterior urethral stenoses’. We identified the latest available evidence in the use of robotic technology in specific FRNU procedures such as the reconstruction of the ureters, bladder and urinary sphincter, urinary diversion, and repair of genitourinary prolapse and fistula. We found that there is a lack of prospective studies to assess the robotic-assisted approach in the field of FRNU. Despite this, the advantages that robotic technology can bring to the field of FRNU are evident, including better ergonomics and visual field, less blood loss and shorter hospital stays. There is therefore a need for further prospective studies with larger patient numbers and longer follow-up periods to establish the reproducibility of these results and the long-term efficacy of the procedures, as well as the impact on patient outcomes. Common index procedures and a standardized approach to these procedures should be identified to enhance training.https://doi.org/10.1177/17562872231213727 |
| spellingShingle | Hermione Tsoi Sameh F. Elnasharty Mehmet Gokhan Culha Sabrina De Cillis Cyrille Guillot-Tantay François Hervé Tanja Hüesch Nicholas Raison Véronique Phé Nadir I. Osman Current evidence of robotic-assisted surgery use in functional reconstructive and neuro-urology Therapeutic Advances in Urology |
| title | Current evidence of robotic-assisted surgery use in functional reconstructive and neuro-urology |
| title_full | Current evidence of robotic-assisted surgery use in functional reconstructive and neuro-urology |
| title_fullStr | Current evidence of robotic-assisted surgery use in functional reconstructive and neuro-urology |
| title_full_unstemmed | Current evidence of robotic-assisted surgery use in functional reconstructive and neuro-urology |
| title_short | Current evidence of robotic-assisted surgery use in functional reconstructive and neuro-urology |
| title_sort | current evidence of robotic assisted surgery use in functional reconstructive and neuro urology |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1177/17562872231213727 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hermionetsoi currentevidenceofroboticassistedsurgeryuseinfunctionalreconstructiveandneurourology AT samehfelnasharty currentevidenceofroboticassistedsurgeryuseinfunctionalreconstructiveandneurourology AT mehmetgokhanculha currentevidenceofroboticassistedsurgeryuseinfunctionalreconstructiveandneurourology AT sabrinadecillis currentevidenceofroboticassistedsurgeryuseinfunctionalreconstructiveandneurourology AT cyrilleguillottantay currentevidenceofroboticassistedsurgeryuseinfunctionalreconstructiveandneurourology AT francoisherve currentevidenceofroboticassistedsurgeryuseinfunctionalreconstructiveandneurourology AT tanjahuesch currentevidenceofroboticassistedsurgeryuseinfunctionalreconstructiveandneurourology AT nicholasraison currentevidenceofroboticassistedsurgeryuseinfunctionalreconstructiveandneurourology AT veroniquephe currentevidenceofroboticassistedsurgeryuseinfunctionalreconstructiveandneurourology AT nadiriosman currentevidenceofroboticassistedsurgeryuseinfunctionalreconstructiveandneurourology |