Environmental DNA surveys of African biodiversity: State of knowledge, challenges, and opportunities

Abstract Environmental DNA surveys have become a well‐established tool for detecting natural communities, showing excellent promise for supporting biodiversity monitoring, conservation, and management efforts. Africa is a continent of exceptional biodiversity, threatened not only by anthropogenic pr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sophie von derHeyden
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-01-01
Series:Environmental DNA
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.363
_version_ 1797946777061556224
author Sophie von derHeyden
author_facet Sophie von derHeyden
author_sort Sophie von derHeyden
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Environmental DNA surveys have become a well‐established tool for detecting natural communities, showing excellent promise for supporting biodiversity monitoring, conservation, and management efforts. Africa is a continent of exceptional biodiversity, threatened not only by anthropogenic pressures but also by a general lack of research capacity and infrastructure, limiting evaluation and monitoring of ecosystems. This commentary explores the use of environmental DNA in surveying natural diversity, a rapidly moving field, within the context of capturing Africa's natural capital. Through an extensive literature search and filtering, 65 papers from 22 countries were identified, with research from Madagascar and Africa forming the bulk of the literature (~38%), with many countries only represented by one to three papers. There was a diverse range of studies, with more than half reporting on communities or diet analyses; freshwater and marine research are underrepresented, accounting for ~5% of studies. There were some papers on disease monitoring, particularly in freshwater. Disturbingly, representation of authors was highly skewed and highlights the ongoing inequality of scientific publishing and the extent of parachute science; one‐third of papers (n = 21) reported no African representation, in contrast with the 18 papers that had either first or senior authors affiliated with an institution in Africa. The remainder of the papers (n = 27) had at least one author affiliated with an African institution. In addition, less than half of papers reported appropriate sampling permits. Importantly and with a concerted global effort, building long‐term capacity, through meaningful and equitable relationships will help increase self‐sustaining science around technologies based on eDNA, thus ensuring not only biodiversity but also humanitarian benefits across Africa.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T21:16:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6b7125d8f56844fb9c0836782f424e3f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2637-4943
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T21:16:20Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Environmental DNA
spelling doaj.art-6b7125d8f56844fb9c0836782f424e3f2023-01-20T12:18:11ZengWileyEnvironmental DNA2637-49432023-01-0151121710.1002/edn3.363Environmental DNA surveys of African biodiversity: State of knowledge, challenges, and opportunitiesSophie von derHeyden0Evolutionary Genomics Group University of Stellenbosch Matieland South AfricaAbstract Environmental DNA surveys have become a well‐established tool for detecting natural communities, showing excellent promise for supporting biodiversity monitoring, conservation, and management efforts. Africa is a continent of exceptional biodiversity, threatened not only by anthropogenic pressures but also by a general lack of research capacity and infrastructure, limiting evaluation and monitoring of ecosystems. This commentary explores the use of environmental DNA in surveying natural diversity, a rapidly moving field, within the context of capturing Africa's natural capital. Through an extensive literature search and filtering, 65 papers from 22 countries were identified, with research from Madagascar and Africa forming the bulk of the literature (~38%), with many countries only represented by one to three papers. There was a diverse range of studies, with more than half reporting on communities or diet analyses; freshwater and marine research are underrepresented, accounting for ~5% of studies. There were some papers on disease monitoring, particularly in freshwater. Disturbingly, representation of authors was highly skewed and highlights the ongoing inequality of scientific publishing and the extent of parachute science; one‐third of papers (n = 21) reported no African representation, in contrast with the 18 papers that had either first or senior authors affiliated with an institution in Africa. The remainder of the papers (n = 27) had at least one author affiliated with an African institution. In addition, less than half of papers reported appropriate sampling permits. Importantly and with a concerted global effort, building long‐term capacity, through meaningful and equitable relationships will help increase self‐sustaining science around technologies based on eDNA, thus ensuring not only biodiversity but also humanitarian benefits across Africa.https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.363
spellingShingle Sophie von derHeyden
Environmental DNA surveys of African biodiversity: State of knowledge, challenges, and opportunities
Environmental DNA
title Environmental DNA surveys of African biodiversity: State of knowledge, challenges, and opportunities
title_full Environmental DNA surveys of African biodiversity: State of knowledge, challenges, and opportunities
title_fullStr Environmental DNA surveys of African biodiversity: State of knowledge, challenges, and opportunities
title_full_unstemmed Environmental DNA surveys of African biodiversity: State of knowledge, challenges, and opportunities
title_short Environmental DNA surveys of African biodiversity: State of knowledge, challenges, and opportunities
title_sort environmental dna surveys of african biodiversity state of knowledge challenges and opportunities
url https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.363
work_keys_str_mv AT sophievonderheyden environmentaldnasurveysofafricanbiodiversitystateofknowledgechallengesandopportunities