Comparative Analysis of Static and Viscoelastic Mechanical Behavior of Different Luting Material Categories after Aging

The longevity of indirect restorations is primarily determined by the appropriate selection of the luting material. The function of a luting material is to seal the restoration and hold it in place for the time required for service. The mechanical behavior of luting materials and in particular their...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nicoleta Ilie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-03-01
Series:Materials
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/6/1452
_version_ 1797541116126429184
author Nicoleta Ilie
author_facet Nicoleta Ilie
author_sort Nicoleta Ilie
collection DOAJ
description The longevity of indirect restorations is primarily determined by the appropriate selection of the luting material. The function of a luting material is to seal the restoration and hold it in place for the time required for service. The mechanical behavior of luting materials and in particular their aging behavior, therefore, play a decisive role. The study provides a comparative analysis of the static and dynamic mechanical behavior of the most commonly used luting material categories—zinc phosphate cement, glass–ionomer cement, resin-modified glass–ionomer cement, resin-based composites, and self-adhesive resin-based composites—and their aging behavior. It also takes into account that luting materials are viscoelastic materials, i.e., materials that respond to external loading in a way that lies between an elastic solid and a viscous liquid. Flexural strength and modulus were determined in a three-point bending test followed by fractography analysis. The quasi-static and viscoelastic behavior was analyzed by a depth-sensing indentation test provided with a dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) module at 20 different frequencies (1–50 Hz). The fracture toughness was evaluated in a notchless triangular prism (NTP) test. Material type exhibits the strongest influence on all measured properties, while the effect of aging becomes more evident in the material reliability. The variation of the viscoelastic parameters with aging reflects cement maturation or polymer plasticization.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T13:10:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6b747d5ffabe44e48af71d416fba50cc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1944
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T13:10:53Z
publishDate 2021-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Materials
spelling doaj.art-6b747d5ffabe44e48af71d416fba50cc2023-11-21T10:46:06ZengMDPI AGMaterials1996-19442021-03-01146145210.3390/ma14061452Comparative Analysis of Static and Viscoelastic Mechanical Behavior of Different Luting Material Categories after AgingNicoleta Ilie0Department of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich Goethestr. 70, D-80336 Munich, GermanyThe longevity of indirect restorations is primarily determined by the appropriate selection of the luting material. The function of a luting material is to seal the restoration and hold it in place for the time required for service. The mechanical behavior of luting materials and in particular their aging behavior, therefore, play a decisive role. The study provides a comparative analysis of the static and dynamic mechanical behavior of the most commonly used luting material categories—zinc phosphate cement, glass–ionomer cement, resin-modified glass–ionomer cement, resin-based composites, and self-adhesive resin-based composites—and their aging behavior. It also takes into account that luting materials are viscoelastic materials, i.e., materials that respond to external loading in a way that lies between an elastic solid and a viscous liquid. Flexural strength and modulus were determined in a three-point bending test followed by fractography analysis. The quasi-static and viscoelastic behavior was analyzed by a depth-sensing indentation test provided with a dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) module at 20 different frequencies (1–50 Hz). The fracture toughness was evaluated in a notchless triangular prism (NTP) test. Material type exhibits the strongest influence on all measured properties, while the effect of aging becomes more evident in the material reliability. The variation of the viscoelastic parameters with aging reflects cement maturation or polymer plasticization.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/6/1452luting materialsflexural strengthmodulusinterfacial fracture toughnessdynamic mechanical analysisviscoelasticity
spellingShingle Nicoleta Ilie
Comparative Analysis of Static and Viscoelastic Mechanical Behavior of Different Luting Material Categories after Aging
Materials
luting materials
flexural strength
modulus
interfacial fracture toughness
dynamic mechanical analysis
viscoelasticity
title Comparative Analysis of Static and Viscoelastic Mechanical Behavior of Different Luting Material Categories after Aging
title_full Comparative Analysis of Static and Viscoelastic Mechanical Behavior of Different Luting Material Categories after Aging
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of Static and Viscoelastic Mechanical Behavior of Different Luting Material Categories after Aging
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of Static and Viscoelastic Mechanical Behavior of Different Luting Material Categories after Aging
title_short Comparative Analysis of Static and Viscoelastic Mechanical Behavior of Different Luting Material Categories after Aging
title_sort comparative analysis of static and viscoelastic mechanical behavior of different luting material categories after aging
topic luting materials
flexural strength
modulus
interfacial fracture toughness
dynamic mechanical analysis
viscoelasticity
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/6/1452
work_keys_str_mv AT nicoletailie comparativeanalysisofstaticandviscoelasticmechanicalbehaviorofdifferentlutingmaterialcategoriesafteraging