Differential herbivore occupancy of fire-manipulated savannas in the Satara region of the Kruger National Park, South Africa

The Kruger National Park’s (KNP) long-running experimental burn plots (EBPs) have a history of research projects, which improve the understanding of fire in savanna ecosystems. Using data from KNP’s aerial censuses (2005–2016) and in situ dung count data (2008–2017), this study assessed (1) herbivor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thobile B. Dlamini, Brian K. Reilly, Dave I. Thompson, Deron E. Burkepile, Judith M. Botha, Anthony G. Rebelo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AOSIS 2020-10-01
Series:Koedoe: African Protected Area Conservation and Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://koedoe.co.za/index.php/koedoe/article/view/1603
_version_ 1818279231685132288
author Thobile B. Dlamini
Brian K. Reilly
Dave I. Thompson
Deron E. Burkepile
Judith M. Botha
Anthony G. Rebelo
author_facet Thobile B. Dlamini
Brian K. Reilly
Dave I. Thompson
Deron E. Burkepile
Judith M. Botha
Anthony G. Rebelo
author_sort Thobile B. Dlamini
collection DOAJ
description The Kruger National Park’s (KNP) long-running experimental burn plots (EBPs) have a history of research projects, which improve the understanding of fire in savanna ecosystems. Using data from KNP’s aerial censuses (2005–2016) and in situ dung count data (2008–2017), this study assessed (1) herbivore densities on the Satara, N’Wanetsi and Marheya EBPs, on annual, triennial and no-burn treatments and across pre-, during and post-drought climate conditions; (2) herbivore densities of these EBPs relative to their non-manipulated surroundings and (3) the extent to which distance to water and rainfall influence ungulate densities. The results revealed that herbivore mean density differed significantly between the three EBPs of Satara and across their fire treatments. N’Wanetsi showed the highest density (0.30 animals/ha), whilst the lowest was found at Marheya (0.12 animals/ha). Overall, pre-drought density was higher on the annual plots (0.56 animals/ha), whilst higher post-drought density was evidenced on the triennial plots (0.80 animals/ha). On average, there were significantly higher herbivore densities on the EBPs (2.54 animals/ha) compared to the surrounding matrix at the larger scales of the Satara management section (0.15 animals/ha) and the central KNP (0.18 animals/ha). A positive correlation between herbivore mean density estimate and distance to water was shown. However, grazer mean density across fire treatments was strongly correlated to rainfall. Conservation implications: Given the variation in fire regimes and their application, and the non-uniform and elevated herbivore densities of the EBPs, inferences from the EBPs cannot be made to the larger KNP. The trials should rather be viewed as an isolated, fire herbivory experiment. It is also recommended to align the experiment with South African National Parks’ mandate by including biodiversity parameters like small mammals and insects in the monitoring of the plots.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T23:30:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6b7da6e057e74e728663a67d353b1b71
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0075-6458
2071-0771
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T23:30:03Z
publishDate 2020-10-01
publisher AOSIS
record_format Article
series Koedoe: African Protected Area Conservation and Science
spelling doaj.art-6b7da6e057e74e728663a67d353b1b712022-12-22T00:07:50ZengAOSISKoedoe: African Protected Area Conservation and Science0075-64582071-07712020-10-01621e1e810.4102/koedoe.v62i1.16031227Differential herbivore occupancy of fire-manipulated savannas in the Satara region of the Kruger National Park, South AfricaThobile B. Dlamini0Brian K. Reilly1Dave I. Thompson2Deron E. Burkepile3Judith M. Botha4Anthony G. Rebelo5Department of Nature Conservation, Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria, South Africa; and, South African Environmental Observation Network (SAEON), Ndlovu Node, PhalaborwaDepartment of Nature Conservation, Tshwane University of Technology, PretoriaSouth African Environmental Observation Network (SAEON), Ndlovu Node, Phalaborwa, South Africa; and, School of Geography, Archaeology and Environmental Studies, University of the Witwatersrand, JohannesburgDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa BarbaraScientific Services, South African National Parks, SkukuzaSouth African National Biodiversity Institute, Brummeria, PretoriaThe Kruger National Park’s (KNP) long-running experimental burn plots (EBPs) have a history of research projects, which improve the understanding of fire in savanna ecosystems. Using data from KNP’s aerial censuses (2005–2016) and in situ dung count data (2008–2017), this study assessed (1) herbivore densities on the Satara, N’Wanetsi and Marheya EBPs, on annual, triennial and no-burn treatments and across pre-, during and post-drought climate conditions; (2) herbivore densities of these EBPs relative to their non-manipulated surroundings and (3) the extent to which distance to water and rainfall influence ungulate densities. The results revealed that herbivore mean density differed significantly between the three EBPs of Satara and across their fire treatments. N’Wanetsi showed the highest density (0.30 animals/ha), whilst the lowest was found at Marheya (0.12 animals/ha). Overall, pre-drought density was higher on the annual plots (0.56 animals/ha), whilst higher post-drought density was evidenced on the triennial plots (0.80 animals/ha). On average, there were significantly higher herbivore densities on the EBPs (2.54 animals/ha) compared to the surrounding matrix at the larger scales of the Satara management section (0.15 animals/ha) and the central KNP (0.18 animals/ha). A positive correlation between herbivore mean density estimate and distance to water was shown. However, grazer mean density across fire treatments was strongly correlated to rainfall. Conservation implications: Given the variation in fire regimes and their application, and the non-uniform and elevated herbivore densities of the EBPs, inferences from the EBPs cannot be made to the larger KNP. The trials should rather be viewed as an isolated, fire herbivory experiment. It is also recommended to align the experiment with South African National Parks’ mandate by including biodiversity parameters like small mammals and insects in the monitoring of the plots.https://koedoe.co.za/index.php/koedoe/article/view/1603conservationprotected areasecosystem managementecologyfireherbivore densitiesebps
spellingShingle Thobile B. Dlamini
Brian K. Reilly
Dave I. Thompson
Deron E. Burkepile
Judith M. Botha
Anthony G. Rebelo
Differential herbivore occupancy of fire-manipulated savannas in the Satara region of the Kruger National Park, South Africa
Koedoe: African Protected Area Conservation and Science
conservation
protected areas
ecosystem management
ecology
fire
herbivore densities
ebps
title Differential herbivore occupancy of fire-manipulated savannas in the Satara region of the Kruger National Park, South Africa
title_full Differential herbivore occupancy of fire-manipulated savannas in the Satara region of the Kruger National Park, South Africa
title_fullStr Differential herbivore occupancy of fire-manipulated savannas in the Satara region of the Kruger National Park, South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Differential herbivore occupancy of fire-manipulated savannas in the Satara region of the Kruger National Park, South Africa
title_short Differential herbivore occupancy of fire-manipulated savannas in the Satara region of the Kruger National Park, South Africa
title_sort differential herbivore occupancy of fire manipulated savannas in the satara region of the kruger national park south africa
topic conservation
protected areas
ecosystem management
ecology
fire
herbivore densities
ebps
url https://koedoe.co.za/index.php/koedoe/article/view/1603
work_keys_str_mv AT thobilebdlamini differentialherbivoreoccupancyoffiremanipulatedsavannasinthesatararegionofthekrugernationalparksouthafrica
AT briankreilly differentialherbivoreoccupancyoffiremanipulatedsavannasinthesatararegionofthekrugernationalparksouthafrica
AT daveithompson differentialherbivoreoccupancyoffiremanipulatedsavannasinthesatararegionofthekrugernationalparksouthafrica
AT deroneburkepile differentialherbivoreoccupancyoffiremanipulatedsavannasinthesatararegionofthekrugernationalparksouthafrica
AT judithmbotha differentialherbivoreoccupancyoffiremanipulatedsavannasinthesatararegionofthekrugernationalparksouthafrica
AT anthonygrebelo differentialherbivoreoccupancyoffiremanipulatedsavannasinthesatararegionofthekrugernationalparksouthafrica