Secondary Analysis of Qualitative Interview Data: Objections and Experiences. Results of a German Feasibility Study
The German feasibility study on archiving and reusing qualitative interview data has surveyed experts, namely qualitative researchers. Their views, ideas and problems have to be considered as central conditions if the aim is to open up the horizon for the theory and practice of secondary analysis. A...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
FQS
2011-09-01
|
| Series: | Forum: Qualitative Social Research |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1742 |
| _version_ | 1811314980679581696 |
|---|---|
| author | Irena Medjedović |
| author_facet | Irena Medjedović |
| author_sort | Irena Medjedović |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The German feasibility study on archiving and reusing qualitative interview data has surveyed experts, namely qualitative researchers. Their views, ideas and problems have to be considered as central conditions if the aim is to open up the horizon for the theory and practice of secondary analysis. Although the overall results of the feasibility study can be regarded as quite positive, this contribution takes a closer look at the issues of secondary analysis of qualitative data. The analysis shows that there are some concerns and open issues associated with this new and unfamiliar research strategy. On the methodological side specificity and context sensitivity of qualitative research are raised as objections. On the ethical side concerns relate to an assumed breach of the confidential relationship to the research subject constituted within an interview. Furthermore, considerations concerning competition also play a role when researchers are asked to provide their data for reuse by others. This article provides a further step for a discussion about qualitative secondary analysis (in Germany), by pointing out the critical aspects of secondary analysis. But the experience of the expert researchers who were interviewed suggests that the problems associated with secondary analysis do not necessarily constitute unsolvable obstacles.
URN: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1103104 |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-13T11:22:12Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-6b7dfaaa2f5243c8833633574ad088db |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1438-5627 |
| language | deu |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-13T11:22:12Z |
| publishDate | 2011-09-01 |
| publisher | FQS |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Forum: Qualitative Social Research |
| spelling | doaj.art-6b7dfaaa2f5243c8833633574ad088db2022-12-22T02:48:48ZdeuFQSForum: Qualitative Social Research1438-56272011-09-011231433Secondary Analysis of Qualitative Interview Data: Objections and Experiences. Results of a German Feasibility StudyIrena Medjedović0Universität BremenThe German feasibility study on archiving and reusing qualitative interview data has surveyed experts, namely qualitative researchers. Their views, ideas and problems have to be considered as central conditions if the aim is to open up the horizon for the theory and practice of secondary analysis. Although the overall results of the feasibility study can be regarded as quite positive, this contribution takes a closer look at the issues of secondary analysis of qualitative data. The analysis shows that there are some concerns and open issues associated with this new and unfamiliar research strategy. On the methodological side specificity and context sensitivity of qualitative research are raised as objections. On the ethical side concerns relate to an assumed breach of the confidential relationship to the research subject constituted within an interview. Furthermore, considerations concerning competition also play a role when researchers are asked to provide their data for reuse by others. This article provides a further step for a discussion about qualitative secondary analysis (in Germany), by pointing out the critical aspects of secondary analysis. But the experience of the expert researchers who were interviewed suggests that the problems associated with secondary analysis do not necessarily constitute unsolvable obstacles. URN: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1103104http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1742secondary analysisqualitative interviewsfeasibility studydata fitcontextresearch ethics |
| spellingShingle | Irena Medjedović Secondary Analysis of Qualitative Interview Data: Objections and Experiences. Results of a German Feasibility Study Forum: Qualitative Social Research secondary analysis qualitative interviews feasibility study data fit context research ethics |
| title | Secondary Analysis of Qualitative Interview Data: Objections and Experiences. Results of a German Feasibility Study |
| title_full | Secondary Analysis of Qualitative Interview Data: Objections and Experiences. Results of a German Feasibility Study |
| title_fullStr | Secondary Analysis of Qualitative Interview Data: Objections and Experiences. Results of a German Feasibility Study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Secondary Analysis of Qualitative Interview Data: Objections and Experiences. Results of a German Feasibility Study |
| title_short | Secondary Analysis of Qualitative Interview Data: Objections and Experiences. Results of a German Feasibility Study |
| title_sort | secondary analysis of qualitative interview data objections and experiences results of a german feasibility study |
| topic | secondary analysis qualitative interviews feasibility study data fit context research ethics |
| url | http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1742 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT irenamedjedovic secondaryanalysisofqualitativeinterviewdataobjectionsandexperiencesresultsofagermanfeasibilitystudy |