Comparison of whole blood cytokine immunoassays for rapid, functional immune phenotyping in critically ill patients with sepsis

Abstract Background Sepsis is characterized by highly heterogeneous immune responses associated with a spectrum of disease severity. Methods that rapidly and sensitively profile these immune responses can potentially personalize immune-adjuvant therapies for sepsis. We hypothesized that the ELLA mic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anthony S. Bonavia, Abigail Samuelsen, Menglu Liang, Jodi Hanson, Daniel McKeone, Zissis C. Chroneos, E. Scott Halstead
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2023-10-01
Series:Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-023-00556-w
_version_ 1797578601465380864
author Anthony S. Bonavia
Abigail Samuelsen
Menglu Liang
Jodi Hanson
Daniel McKeone
Zissis C. Chroneos
E. Scott Halstead
author_facet Anthony S. Bonavia
Abigail Samuelsen
Menglu Liang
Jodi Hanson
Daniel McKeone
Zissis C. Chroneos
E. Scott Halstead
author_sort Anthony S. Bonavia
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Sepsis is characterized by highly heterogeneous immune responses associated with a spectrum of disease severity. Methods that rapidly and sensitively profile these immune responses can potentially personalize immune-adjuvant therapies for sepsis. We hypothesized that the ELLA microfluidic approach to measure cytokine production from the whole blood of septic and critically ill patients would deliver faster, more precise results than the existing optic-driven ELISpot quantification. We tested our hypothesis by measuring ex vivo-stimulated production of TNF and IFNγ in critically ill and septic patients (n = 22), critically ill and non-septic patients (n = 10), and healthy volunteers (n = 10) through both ELLA and ELISpot immunoassays. Blood samples were subjected to one of three stimulants for 4 h or 18 h durations during days 1, 7–10, and 14 of critical illness. Stimulants for lymphocytes included anti-CD3/anti-CD28 and phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), whereas LPS was used for monocytes. Stimulated TNF and IFNγ concentrations were then associated with 30-day mortality. Results Both ELISpot and ELLA immunoassays showed substantial agreement in TNF concentrations post 4 h and 18 h LPS stimulation, with concordance correlation coefficients at 0.62 and 0.60, respectively. ELLA had a broad dynamic measurement range and provided accurate TNF and IFNγ readings at both minimal and elevated cytokine concentrations (with mean coefficients of variation between triplicate readings at 2.1 ± 1.4% and 4.9 ± 7.2%, respectively). However, there was no association between the ELLA-determined cytokine concentrations on the first day of critical illness and 30-day mortality rate. In contrast, using the ELISpot for cytokine quantification revealed that non-survivors had reduced baseline TNF levels at 18 h, decreased LPS-induced TNF levels at 18 h, and diminished TNF levels post 4 h/18 h anti-CD3/28 stimulation. Conclusions Our study affirms the feasibility of obtaining dependable immune phenotyping data within 6 h of blood collection from critically ill patients, both septic and non-septic, using the ELLA immunoassay. Both ELLA and ELISpot can offer valuable insights into prognosis, therapeutic strategies, and the underlying mechanisms of sepsis development.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T22:24:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6b7f80b19ab24f1fbce8e70d047f84d9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2197-425X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T22:24:07Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
spelling doaj.art-6b7f80b19ab24f1fbce8e70d047f84d92023-11-19T12:10:12ZengSpringerOpenIntensive Care Medicine Experimental2197-425X2023-10-0111111810.1186/s40635-023-00556-wComparison of whole blood cytokine immunoassays for rapid, functional immune phenotyping in critically ill patients with sepsisAnthony S. Bonavia0Abigail Samuelsen1Menglu Liang2Jodi Hanson3Daniel McKeone4Zissis C. Chroneos5E. Scott Halstead6Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical CenterDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical CenterDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of MarylandCellular TechnologyDepartment of Pediatrics, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical CenterDepartment of Pediatrics, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical CenterDepartment of Pediatrics, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical CenterAbstract Background Sepsis is characterized by highly heterogeneous immune responses associated with a spectrum of disease severity. Methods that rapidly and sensitively profile these immune responses can potentially personalize immune-adjuvant therapies for sepsis. We hypothesized that the ELLA microfluidic approach to measure cytokine production from the whole blood of septic and critically ill patients would deliver faster, more precise results than the existing optic-driven ELISpot quantification. We tested our hypothesis by measuring ex vivo-stimulated production of TNF and IFNγ in critically ill and septic patients (n = 22), critically ill and non-septic patients (n = 10), and healthy volunteers (n = 10) through both ELLA and ELISpot immunoassays. Blood samples were subjected to one of three stimulants for 4 h or 18 h durations during days 1, 7–10, and 14 of critical illness. Stimulants for lymphocytes included anti-CD3/anti-CD28 and phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), whereas LPS was used for monocytes. Stimulated TNF and IFNγ concentrations were then associated with 30-day mortality. Results Both ELISpot and ELLA immunoassays showed substantial agreement in TNF concentrations post 4 h and 18 h LPS stimulation, with concordance correlation coefficients at 0.62 and 0.60, respectively. ELLA had a broad dynamic measurement range and provided accurate TNF and IFNγ readings at both minimal and elevated cytokine concentrations (with mean coefficients of variation between triplicate readings at 2.1 ± 1.4% and 4.9 ± 7.2%, respectively). However, there was no association between the ELLA-determined cytokine concentrations on the first day of critical illness and 30-day mortality rate. In contrast, using the ELISpot for cytokine quantification revealed that non-survivors had reduced baseline TNF levels at 18 h, decreased LPS-induced TNF levels at 18 h, and diminished TNF levels post 4 h/18 h anti-CD3/28 stimulation. Conclusions Our study affirms the feasibility of obtaining dependable immune phenotyping data within 6 h of blood collection from critically ill patients, both septic and non-septic, using the ELLA immunoassay. Both ELLA and ELISpot can offer valuable insights into prognosis, therapeutic strategies, and the underlying mechanisms of sepsis development.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-023-00556-wSepsisImmunoassayCytokinesCritical IllnessHumans
spellingShingle Anthony S. Bonavia
Abigail Samuelsen
Menglu Liang
Jodi Hanson
Daniel McKeone
Zissis C. Chroneos
E. Scott Halstead
Comparison of whole blood cytokine immunoassays for rapid, functional immune phenotyping in critically ill patients with sepsis
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
Sepsis
Immunoassay
Cytokines
Critical Illness
Humans
title Comparison of whole blood cytokine immunoassays for rapid, functional immune phenotyping in critically ill patients with sepsis
title_full Comparison of whole blood cytokine immunoassays for rapid, functional immune phenotyping in critically ill patients with sepsis
title_fullStr Comparison of whole blood cytokine immunoassays for rapid, functional immune phenotyping in critically ill patients with sepsis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of whole blood cytokine immunoassays for rapid, functional immune phenotyping in critically ill patients with sepsis
title_short Comparison of whole blood cytokine immunoassays for rapid, functional immune phenotyping in critically ill patients with sepsis
title_sort comparison of whole blood cytokine immunoassays for rapid functional immune phenotyping in critically ill patients with sepsis
topic Sepsis
Immunoassay
Cytokines
Critical Illness
Humans
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-023-00556-w
work_keys_str_mv AT anthonysbonavia comparisonofwholebloodcytokineimmunoassaysforrapidfunctionalimmunephenotypingincriticallyillpatientswithsepsis
AT abigailsamuelsen comparisonofwholebloodcytokineimmunoassaysforrapidfunctionalimmunephenotypingincriticallyillpatientswithsepsis
AT mengluliang comparisonofwholebloodcytokineimmunoassaysforrapidfunctionalimmunephenotypingincriticallyillpatientswithsepsis
AT jodihanson comparisonofwholebloodcytokineimmunoassaysforrapidfunctionalimmunephenotypingincriticallyillpatientswithsepsis
AT danielmckeone comparisonofwholebloodcytokineimmunoassaysforrapidfunctionalimmunephenotypingincriticallyillpatientswithsepsis
AT zissiscchroneos comparisonofwholebloodcytokineimmunoassaysforrapidfunctionalimmunephenotypingincriticallyillpatientswithsepsis
AT escotthalstead comparisonofwholebloodcytokineimmunoassaysforrapidfunctionalimmunephenotypingincriticallyillpatientswithsepsis